역사적 관점에서 본 ‘태왕사신기’
Examination of Taewangsasingi from Historical Perspective
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The historical fantasy drama Taewangsasingi(The Story of King Kwanggaet'o and the Four Directional Animals), which deals with the story of the Great King Kwanggaet'o who established the most powerful phase in Kouryŏ, has been planned in 2003 for the purpose of meeting the social needs to prevent the historical distortion of Koguryŏ history at the time when the Northeast Asian project of China caught the public attention of Korean people. In Taewangsasingi, King Kwanggaet'o was described as 'the modern leadership with gentle charisma' and as a king who would recover the Chyusin Empire as a reincarnation of Hwanwung. In the process of drama making, for a dramatical interest, it cannot but help adding some imagination, exaggeration, and fabrication. Among the contents of Taewangsasingi, following are some points which are different from historical records. First of all, there is a problem of anachronism in several aspects. It traced the origin of the Four directional animals which were originally accepted from the Central Plain region in China back to the Hwanwung period. Some terms such as Sonobu, Chŏlnobu, a tribe and a patriarch which already dismissed before the reign period of King Kwanggaeto appeared again in the drama. And it showed that in the 4th century, a noble could possess more private military than that of a king. All these information is not accorded with the written history. In addition, since it tries to avoid a possible conflict with neighboring countries and to make it easy to export a drama abroad, it did not describe the Later Yan and Japanese Wa overtly, two major countries in the warfare during the King Kwanggaet'o, but only unidentified Hwach'ŏnhoe appeared in the drama, making the historical background obscure. As it described the 4th century Koguryŏ as a legendary age, and King Kwanggaet'o as a king of Chyusin who had been waiting for two millenniums since Hwanwung, it gave lesser importance in Tangun Chosun, and degrading other Koguryŏ kings including Chumong. All these resulted in the devaluation of the history of Old Chosun and Koguryŏ. Likewise, Taewangsasingi is a drama which contains some points quite different from historical records. However, the drama has its significance in terms of showing the historical and social aspects at that time. Taewangsasingi provides us with an important insight that modern Korean society still has strong ethnocentrism, as well as is trying to strive for 'an interest' depart from the obligation that the society does not allow diverse perspectives about the problem concerning a people and patriotism. Also, the reinterpretation on King Kwanggaet'o, the emphasis on Sosŏno, and the description of Huksu Malgal as a major character all reflect the changed perception in modern Korean society.
Abstract
The historical fantasy drama Taewangsasingi(The Story of King Kwanggaet'o and the Four Directional Animals), which deals with the story of the Great King Kwanggaet'o who established the most powerful phase in Kouryŏ, has been planned in 2003 for the purpose of meeting the social needs to prevent the historical distortion of Koguryŏ history at the time when the Northeast Asian project of China caught the public attention of Korean people. In Taewangsasingi, King Kwanggaet'o was described as 'the modern leadership with gentle charisma' and as a king who would recover the Chyusin Empire as a reincarnation of Hwanwung. In the process of drama making, for a dramatical interest, it cannot but help adding some imagination, exaggeration, and fabrication. Among the contents of Taewangsasingi, following are some points which are different from historical records. First of all, there is a problem of anachronism in several aspects. It traced the origin of the Four directional animals which were originally accepted from the Central Plain region in China back to the Hwanwung period. Some terms such as Sonobu, Chŏlnobu, a tribe and a patriarch which already dismissed before the reign period of King Kwanggaeto appeared again in the drama. And it showed that in the 4th century, a noble could possess more private military than that of a king. All these information is not accorded with the written history. In addition, since it tries to avoid a possible conflict with neighboring countries and to make it easy to export a drama abroad, it did not describe the Later Yan and Japanese Wa overtly, two major countries in the warfare during the King Kwanggaet'o, but only unidentified Hwach'ŏnhoe appeared in the drama, making the historical background obscure. As it described the 4th century Koguryŏ as a legendary age, and King Kwanggaet'o as a king of Chyusin who had been waiting for two millenniums since Hwanwung, it gave lesser importance in Tangun Chosun, and degrading other Koguryŏ kings including Chumong. All these resulted in the devaluation of the history of Old Chosun and Koguryŏ. Likewise, Taewangsasingi is a drama which contains some points quite different from historical records. However, the drama has its significance in terms of showing the historical and social aspects at that time. Taewangsasingi provides us with an important insight that modern Korean society still has strong ethnocentrism, as well as is trying to strive for 'an interest' depart from the obligation that the society does not allow diverse perspectives about the problem concerning a people and patriotism. Also, the reinterpretation on King Kwanggaet'o, the emphasis on Sosŏno, and the description of Huksu Malgal as a major character all reflect the changed perception in modern Korean society.
참고문헌 (42)
- "김지연 기자의 기사" (2007)[URL]
- "안진용 기자의 기사" (2007)[URL]
- 韓國古代社會硏究所, "譯註 韓國古代金石文 I(高句麗․百濟․樂浪篇)" (1992), 駕洛國史蹟開發硏究院
- "《梁書》권54 東夷列傳 高句驪", ~
- 金賢淑, "6세기 고구려 集權體制 動搖의 一要因", 慶北史學, 22 (1999)
- "三國史記", ~
- "《三國志》권30 魏書 東夷傳 高句麗", ~
- 김태식, "가야연맹사" (1993), 일조각
- 최종규, "중기 고분의 성격에 대한 약간의 고찰", 부대사학, 7 (1983)
- 김현숙, "4~6세기경 소백산맥 이동지역의 영역 향방", 한국고대사연구, 26, pp.75~114 (2002), 한국고대사학회
- 金賢淑, "延邊地域의 長城을 통해 본 高句麗의 東夫餘支配", 國史館論叢, 88 (2000)
- 노태돈, "5∼6세기 동아시아의 국제정세와 고구려의 대외관계", 동방학지, 44 (1984)
- 林起煥, "4세기 고구려의 樂浪․帶方地域 경영", 歷史學報, 147 (1995)
- 金美炅, "高句麗의 樂浪·帶方地域 進出과 그 支配形態", 學林, 17 (1996)
- 김현숙, "광개토왕비를 통해 본 고구려수묘인의 사회적 성격", 한국사연구, 65 (1989), 한국사연구회
- 金賢淑, "廣開土王碑文의 守墓制와 守墓人, In 廣開土王碑文의 新硏究" (1999), 서라벌군사연구소
- 윤휘탁, "현대 중국의 변강, 민족의식과 '동북공정'", 역사비평, (65), pp.184~205 (2003), 역사문제연구소
- 姜孟山, "高句麗歷史的歸屬問題" (1979), 全國朝鮮史硏究會
- 여호규, "중국학계의 고구려 대외관계사 연구현황", 한국고대사연구, 31, pp.35~66 (2003), 한국고대사학회
- 김현숙, "고구려의 민족, 정치분야에 대한 중국학계의 연구동향, In 중국의 고구려사 연구동향 분석" (2004), 고구려연구재단
- 한경, "고구려 경영학 - ②고구려 영웅들의 리더십", 이코노믹리뷰, ~ (2006)
- 노태돈, "주몽의 출자 전승과 계루부의 기원", 한국고대사논총, 5 (1993), 한국고대사회연구소
- 김현숙, "체제정비, In 한국사 5-삼국의 정치와 사회Ⅰ:고구려-" (1996), 국사편찬위원회
- 김현숙, "고구려의 종족기원과 국가형성과정", 대구사학, 89, pp.33~61 (2007), 대구사학회
- 윤용구, "高句麗의 흥기와 幘溝漊, In 고구려의 역사와 대외관계" (2006), 서경
- 盧泰敦, "三國時代의 部에 관한 硏究", 韓國史論, 2 (1975)
- 金鎭順, "集安 五壟墳 四·五號墓 벽화 연구", 미술사연구, (17), pp.88~91 (2003), 미술사연구회
- 全虎兌, "高句麗 古墳壁畵 硏究-내세관 표현을 중심으로-", 박사, pp.1996
- 김현숙, "6~7세기 고구려사에서의 말갈, In 강좌한국고대사 10" (2003), 가락국사적개발연구원
- 苗威, "箕氏朝鮮硏究", 東北史地 (2004)
- 楊軍, "箕子朝鮮硏究二題", 東北史地 (2005)
- 苗威, "古朝鮮硏究" (2006), 香港亞洲出版社
- "배우 최민수의 ‘태사기’ 출연 장면이 더빙으로 완성된 사실을 알고 있는가?" (2007), 고홍주[URL]
- 여호규, "고구려 드라마 열풍의 허와 실", 한국사 시민강좌, 41 (2007)
- "필름2. 0 2008-01-17의 인터뷰기사"[URL]
- "한국아이닷컴", 소년한국일보, pp.2007, ~
- 이여영, "광개토대왕이 유라시아 대제국건설", 중앙일보, ~ (2007)
- "퓨전사극, 파격의 끝은 어디인가" (2008), 박주연[URL]
- "퓨전사극이 꿈꾸는 혁명, ‘역사왜곡의 진통을 넘어서" (2008), 김미영[URL]
- "이상균 기자의 기사" (2007)[URL]
- "연합뉴스" (2008)[URL]
