셰익스피어의 역사 서술
Shakespeare's Description of History
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to examine how Shakespeare describes the history of England in his English history plays. Like his contemporary dramatists, Shakespeare’s writing about England was influenced by the social and political concerns of his age, and bound up with the anxiety about the war with Spain and the controversy over the royal succession during the last years of Elizabeth I. There have been various opinions about whether Shakespeare demonstrates the validity of the Tudor dynasty. Because it seems that Shakespeare takes an ambiguous position, it is not certain that Shakespeare supports the validity of the Tudor dynasty. However, it is indisputable that his history plays include the intention to prevent the failure of politics. Because history was popular subject in the early modern England, the description of history was generally subject to official scrutiny. Particularly, history plays depict the matters with regard to kings, which made the government control the contents of history plays. Readers and spectators in Renaissance England intended to regard history plays as reflecting the present issues such as the succession to the queen and the circumstances at the moment. Apart from the problem about whether Shakespeare had the intention to represent Renaissance England in his history play, it is more important to understand the various voices in the play.
Abstract
This paper aims to examine how Shakespeare describes the history of England in his English history plays. Like his contemporary dramatists, Shakespeare’s writing about England was influenced by the social and political concerns of his age, and bound up with the anxiety about the war with Spain and the controversy over the royal succession during the last years of Elizabeth I. There have been various opinions about whether Shakespeare demonstrates the validity of the Tudor dynasty. Because it seems that Shakespeare takes an ambiguous position, it is not certain that Shakespeare supports the validity of the Tudor dynasty. However, it is indisputable that his history plays include the intention to prevent the failure of politics. Because history was popular subject in the early modern England, the description of history was generally subject to official scrutiny. Particularly, history plays depict the matters with regard to kings, which made the government control the contents of history plays. Readers and spectators in Renaissance England intended to regard history plays as reflecting the present issues such as the succession to the queen and the circumstances at the moment. Apart from the problem about whether Shakespeare had the intention to represent Renaissance England in his history play, it is more important to understand the various voices in the play.
참고문헌 (26)
- Attwater, A. L., "Shakespeare’s Sources, In A Companion to Shakespeare Studies", pp.219~241 (1966), Cambridge UP
- Campbell, Lily B., "Shakespeare’s Histories: Mirrors of Elizabethan Policy" (1958), Huntington Library
- Carroll, William C., "Theories of Kingship in Shakespeare’s England", pp.125~145
- Chernaik, Warren, "The Cambridge Introduction to Shakespeare’s History Plays" (2007), Cambridge UP
- Clare, J., "Art Made Tongue-Tied by Authority: Elizabethan and Jacobean Dramatic Censorship" (1990), Revels Plays Companion Library
- Clegg, Cyndia S., "Censorship and the Problems with History in Shakespeare’s England", pp.48~69
- Dollimore, Jonathan, "Introduction: Shakespeare, Cultural Materialism and the New Historicism, In Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism", pp.2~17
- Dollimore, Jonathan, "History and Ideology: The Instance of Henry V, In Alternative Shakespeares", pp.210~231 (1985), Routledge
- Dollimore, Jonathan, "Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism" (1985), Manchester UP
- Dutton, Richard, "A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works: The Histories" (2006), Blackwell
- Theatre: An Introduction, "Theory", pp.1997, Fortier, Mark
- Greenblatt, Stephen J., "Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism", pp.18~47 (1985), Manchester UP
- Greenblatt, Stephen J., "Shakespeare and the Exorcists, In Contemporary Literary Criticism: Literary and Cultural Studies", pp.428~447 (1989), Longman
- Hattaway, Michael, "The Shakespearean History Play, In The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare’s History Plays", pp.3~24 (2002), Cambridge UP
- Helgerson, Richard, "Shakespeare and Contemporary Dramatists of History", pp.26~47
- Heywood, Thomas, "An Apology for Actors" (1941), Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints
- Hoenselaars, Ton, "Shakespeare’s English History Plays, In The New Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare", pp.137~152 (2010), Cambridge UP
- Kamps, Ivo, "The Writing of History in Shakespeare’s England", pp.4~25
- Kewes, Paulina, "The Elizabethan History Play: A True Genre?", pp.170~193
- MacCaffrey, W. T., "The Shaping of the Elizabethan Regime: Elizabethan Politics, 1558-1572" (1968), Princeton UP
- Marcus, Leah S., "Elizabeth, In Shakespeare’s Histories", pp.147~179 (2004), Blackwell
- Patterson, Annabel, "Censorship and Interpretation: the Conditions of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England" (1984), U of Wisconsin P
- Ross, David, "Aristotle" (1995), Routledge
- Shakespeare, William, "The Arden Shakespeare Complete Works" (1998), Arden Shakespeare
- Tennenhouse, Leonard, "Strategies of State and Political Plays: A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Henry IV, Henry V, Henry VIII", pp.109~128, Political Shakespeare
- Tillyard, E. M. W., "Shakespeare’s History Plays" (1944), Collier Books