본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

“In argument with men”: Dalila, Drama, and Masculine Heroism in Milton’s Samson Agonistes

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Drawing on Freud’s interpretation of the “fort-da” game, this paper examines Samson Agonistes as Milton’s rewriting of the narrative about Samson and Dalila. The paper argues that through the confrontation between the two biblical lovers, Milton demythologizes Samson’s heroism and probes the ideological content of the controversies surrounding Samson and his heroism in seventeenth-century England, when both Royalists and revolutionaries exploited his image as a political symbol. A comparison between Milton and Euripides is attempted in order to demonstrate that Milton’s choice of the genre is crucial in understanding his ideas about gender relationship and its impact on the construction of masculine heroic identity. My analysis of the dramatic confrontation between Samson and Dalila, in which the heroine makes an argument for herself, reveals the process through which Dalila’s image as a lethal woman has been constructed by male characters, including Samson, whose problems as a hero can be solved only by blaming the woman. Just as the “fortda” game serves for Freud’s grandson Ernst as a way to transform his anxiety into confidence and loss into mastery, Samson’s denigration of Dalila serves Samson to master his frustration of separation, symbolically presented as the betrayal of Dalila, and to regain his masculine identity. Dalila’s speeches, with which she defends her position just as the female characters do in Euripides’s plays, however, expose Samson’s anxiety about his insecure identity, the emptiness of male superiority, and its inevitable creation of gender hierarchy, as Milton unveils problems involved in the patriarchal construction of a hero.

Abstract

Drawing on Freud’s interpretation of the “fort-da” game, this paper examines Samson Agonistes as Milton’s rewriting of the narrative about Samson and Dalila. The paper argues that through the confrontation between the two biblical lovers, Milton demythologizes Samson’s heroism and probes the ideological content of the controversies surrounding Samson and his heroism in seventeenth-century England, when both Royalists and revolutionaries exploited his image as a political symbol. A comparison between Milton and Euripides is attempted in order to demonstrate that Milton’s choice of the genre is crucial in understanding his ideas about gender relationship and its impact on the construction of masculine heroic identity. My analysis of the dramatic confrontation between Samson and Dalila, in which the heroine makes an argument for herself, reveals the process through which Dalila’s image as a lethal woman has been constructed by male characters, including Samson, whose problems as a hero can be solved only by blaming the woman. Just as the “fortda” game serves for Freud’s grandson Ernst as a way to transform his anxiety into confidence and loss into mastery, Samson’s denigration of Dalila serves Samson to master his frustration of separation, symbolically presented as the betrayal of Dalila, and to regain his masculine identity. Dalila’s speeches, with which she defends her position just as the female characters do in Euripides’s plays, however, expose Samson’s anxiety about his insecure identity, the emptiness of male superiority, and its inevitable creation of gender hierarchy, as Milton unveils problems involved in the patriarchal construction of a hero.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Asals, Heather, "In Defence of Dalila: Samson Agonistes and the Reformation Theology of the Word", Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 74(2), pp.183~194 (1975)
  2. Bal, Mieke, "Lethal Love: Feminist Literary Readings of Biblical Love Stories", pp.37~67 (1987), Indiana UP
  3. Bennet, Joan S., "McColgan and Durham", pp.251~260
  4. Cable, Lana, "Carnal Rhetoric: Milton’s Iconoclasm and the Poetics of Desire" (1995), Duke UP
  5. Chaucer, Geoffrey, "The Wife of Bath’s Prologue and Tale. The Canterbury Tales, The Riverside Chaucer" (2008), Oxford UP
  6. Chodorow, Nancy J., "The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender, With a New Preface" (1999), U of California P
  7. Damico, Helen, "Duality in Dramatic Vision: A Structural Analysis of Samson Agonistes", Milton Studies, 12, pp.91~116 (1978)
  8. Hippolytus, "Alcestis", pp.Penguin, Iphigenia in Tauris
  9. Freud, Sigmund, "Beyond the Pleasure Principle" (1961), Norton
  10. Gay, David, "Honied Words: Wisdom and Recognition in Samson Agonistes", Milton Studies, 29, pp.35~58 (1993)
  11. Guibbory, Achsah, "‘The Jewish Question’ and ‘The Woman Question’ in Samson Agonistes; Gender, Religion, and Nation. Martin", 184~203
  12. Guillory, John, "Re-membering Milton: Essays on the Texts and Traditions", pp.148~176 (1987)
  13. Guillory, John, "Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discourse of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe", pp.106~122 (1986), U of Chicago P
  14. Jacobus, Lee A., "Dalila, Misogyny, and the De Casibus Tradition. McColgan and Durham", 261~270
  15. Martin, Catherine Gimelli, "Milton and Gender" (2004), Cambridge UP
  16. Martin, Catherine Gimelli, "Dalila, Misogyny, and Milton’s Christian Liberty of Divorce. Martin", 53~74
  17. McColgan, Kristin Pruitt, "Arenas of Conflict:Milton and the Unfettered Mind", pp.1997, Susquehanna UP
  18. Milton, John, "The Riverside Milton" (1998), Houghton Mifflin
  19. Mueller, Janel, "Just Measures: Versification in Samson Agonistes", Milton Studies, 33, pp.47~82 (1996)
  20. Parker, William Riley, "Milton’s Debt to Greek Tragedy in Samson Agonistes" (1963), Archon
  21. Revard, Stella P., "Dalila as a Euripidean Heroine", Papers and Language and Literature, 23, pp.291~302 (1987)
  22. Sauer, Elizabeth, "Pious Fraud: Extralegal Heroism in Samson Agonistes", SEL, 53(1), pp.179~196 (2013)
  23. Sauer, Elizabeth, "The New Milton Criticism", pp.120~136 (2012), Cambridge UP
  24. Sypniewski, Holly M., "Double Motivation and the Ambiguity of ‘Ungodly Deeds’: Euripides’s Medea and Milton’s Samson Agonistes", Milton Quarterly, 44(3), pp.145~167 (2010)
  25. Tesky, Gordon, "Delirius Milton: The Fate of the Poet in Modernity" (2006), Harvard UP
  26. Ulreich, John C. Jr, "Milton and the Idea of Woman", pp.185~210 (1988), U of Illinois P
  27. Trubowitz, Rachel, "I was his nursling once: Nation Lactation, and the Hebraic in Samson Agonistes. Martin", 167~183
  28. Walker, Julia M., "Milton and the Idea of Woman" (1988), U of Illinois P
  29. Wittreich, Joseph Anthony, "Shifting Contexts: Reinterpreting Samson Agonistes" (2002), Duquesne UP
  30. Wittreich, Joseph Anthony, "Interpreting Samson Agonistes" (1986), Princeton UP
  31. Woods, Susanne, "How Free Are Milton’s Women? Walker", 15~31

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)