공정거래법상 수직적 공동행위의 규제에 관한 연구
A Study on Regulation of Vertical Cartels under the Korea Anti-Monopoly and Fair Trade Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The currently debated issue of regulating unilateral conducts under the Korea Anti-Monopoly and Fair Trade Act (the KAFTA or the Act) is closely related to the issue of regulating vertical cartels under the Act. So far, the law enforcement against the improper cartels under the Act by the Korea Fair Trade Commission has focused solely upon horizontal agreements. Such law enforcement was presumably affected by the law enforcement against improper restraints under the Japan by the Japan Fair Trade Commission. However, this does not have any statutory ground in the KAFTA nor competition policy justifications. Such law enforcement approach to improper cartels under the Act may make vague the fundamental distinction between concerted conducts and unilateral conducts and cause serious problems in the competition law regulatory system under the Act. It may make the regulation of improper cartels incomplete and cause unnecessary confusion on regulating unilateral conducts under the Act. Regulating vertical cartels is one of the urgent tasks not only for improving law enforcement against improper cartels under the Act, but also for having the overall competition law regulatory system more advanced.
Abstract
The currently debated issue of regulating unilateral conducts under the Korea Anti-Monopoly and Fair Trade Act (the KAFTA or the Act) is closely related to the issue of regulating vertical cartels under the Act. So far, the law enforcement against the improper cartels under the Act by the Korea Fair Trade Commission has focused solely upon horizontal agreements. Such law enforcement was presumably affected by the law enforcement against improper restraints under the Japan by the Japan Fair Trade Commission. However, this does not have any statutory ground in the KAFTA nor competition policy justifications. Such law enforcement approach to improper cartels under the Act may make vague the fundamental distinction between concerted conducts and unilateral conducts and cause serious problems in the competition law regulatory system under the Act. It may make the regulation of improper cartels incomplete and cause unnecessary confusion on regulating unilateral conducts under the Act. Regulating vertical cartels is one of the urgent tasks not only for improving law enforcement against improper cartels under the Act, but also for having the overall competition law regulatory system more advanced.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김성묵, "재판매가격유지행위에 관한 미 연방대법원판결 변천", 경쟁저널, (136) (2008)
- 김영호, "경제법" (1990), 범론사
- 박길준, "한국독점규제법" (1983), 삼영사
- 변동열, "공정거래법상 부당한 공동행위의 사법(私法)적 효력", 민사판례연구, (31), pp.825~873 (2009), 민사판례연구회
- 손주찬, "경제법" (1993), 법경출판사
- 신현윤, "경제법" (2006), 박영사
- 이봉의, "포스코판결과 방해남용의 행방", 경쟁저널, (40) (2008)
- 이호영, "독점규제법상 상표내 경쟁제한행위의 규제에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 이호영, "수직적 거래제한의 규제 미국의 학설 및 판례이론을 중심으로, In 공정거래와 법치" (2004), 법문사
- 이호영, "공정거래법상 시장지배적사업자 규제의 재점과 과제", 저스티스, (104), pp.75~99 (2008), 한국법학원
- 이호영, "독점규제법(개정판)" (2010), 홍문사
- 이황, "공정거래법상 단독의 위반행위 규제의 체계 - 시장지배적 지위 남용행위로서의 거래거절행위의 위법성, 그 본질과 판단기준", 사법, 1(5), pp.201~263 (2008), 사법발전재단
- 정호열, "경제법(제2판)" (2008), 박영사
- 허찬무, "공정거래법과 카르텔규제" (2000), 비봉사
- 황적인, "경제법(5정판)" (1996), 법문사
- 신광식, "시장지배적 사업자의 거래거절에 대한 공정거래법리: 대법원의 포스코 사건 판결", 경쟁법연구, 18, pp.74~116 (2008), 한국경쟁법학회
- 황창식, "공정거래법상 시장지배력 남용규제의 해석 및 집행상의 문제점 불공정거래행위 규제와의 법적용 관계를 중심으로", 경제법 판례연구, 5 (2009)
- 공정거래위원회, "2009년도 통계연보", ~ (2010)
- 厚谷襄児, "条解独占禁止法" (1997), 弘文堂
- 金井貴嗣, "独占禁止法" (2004), 弘文堂
- 白石忠志, "独占禁止法" (2006), 有斐閣
- "Antitrust Law Developments" (2007)
- Hovenkamp, "Federal Antitrust Policy,In The Law of Competition and Its Practice" (2005), Thomson & West
- Sullivan, "The Law of Antitrust,In Integrated Handbook" (2006), Thomson & West
- Whish, "Competition Law" (2009), Oxford University
- Wijckmans, "Vertical Agreements in EC Competition Law" (2006), Oxford University Press