예선계약의 법적 성질과 대외적 책임관계
Study on Contractual Relationship with Third Parties between the Tug and Tow
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Towage services are always rendered under a contract concluded between a tug and tow for specific services or purpose, at fixed price. Like any other contracts, towage is governed by basic principles of contract law. Towage is the service provided, usually, by specialist tugs, generally to assist the propulsion, or to expedite the movement, of another vessel (the tow) that is not in danger, needing salvage. Tugs can range ocean-going ships to coastal or harbour tugs that are designed which special equipment to push or pull the tow. The purpose of this article is to examine the basic principles relating to risks and liabilities undertaken in the operation of tug and tow under towage contracts governed by Korean Law. Particular attention is given to areas where the law seems to be unsettled under the Korean Maritime Law. There are two aspects concerning towage: first contractual relationship between the tug and tow, as provided for in the contract or statutory implied terms, and, second, their respective relationship with third parties, who are not bound by the contract, but liability of either the tug or the tow towards third parties may arise in tort or under statutory provisions. The contract regulates such liability as between the tow and the tug, by the third parties are not concerned with any arrangements made between tug and tow in the towage contract. With the evolution of the standard form contracts, the relationship between the parties primarily governed by the terms and conditions contained in those contracts. Standard form contracts are: the BIMCO forms designed for international ocean towage (TOWCON and TOWHIRE 1985), new forms of 2008, which resemble voyage and time charters.
Abstract
Towage services are always rendered under a contract concluded between a tug and tow for specific services or purpose, at fixed price. Like any other contracts, towage is governed by basic principles of contract law. Towage is the service provided, usually, by specialist tugs, generally to assist the propulsion, or to expedite the movement, of another vessel (the tow) that is not in danger, needing salvage. Tugs can range ocean-going ships to coastal or harbour tugs that are designed which special equipment to push or pull the tow. The purpose of this article is to examine the basic principles relating to risks and liabilities undertaken in the operation of tug and tow under towage contracts governed by Korean Law. Particular attention is given to areas where the law seems to be unsettled under the Korean Maritime Law. There are two aspects concerning towage: first contractual relationship between the tug and tow, as provided for in the contract or statutory implied terms, and, second, their respective relationship with third parties, who are not bound by the contract, but liability of either the tug or the tow towards third parties may arise in tort or under statutory provisions. The contract regulates such liability as between the tow and the tug, by the third parties are not concerned with any arrangements made between tug and tow in the towage contract. With the evolution of the standard form contracts, the relationship between the parties primarily governed by the terms and conditions contained in those contracts. Standard form contracts are: the BIMCO forms designed for international ocean towage (TOWCON and TOWHIRE 1985), new forms of 2008, which resemble voyage and time charters.
참고문헌 (43)
- 곽윤직, "민법주해ⅩⅤⅢ" (1992), 박영사
- 김인현, "해상법" (2011), 법문사
- 이균성, "신해상법대계" (2010), 한국해양수산개발원
- 임동철, "해상법･국제운송법연구" (1990), 진성사
- 정동윤, "주석상법Ⅷ" (2001), 한국사법행정학회
- 정영석, "해상법원론" (2009), 텍스트북스
- 최종현, "해상법상론" (2009), 박영사
- 김동훈, "定期傭船契約에 대한 法的 檢討", 한국해법학회지, 24(2), pp.11~44 (2002), 한국해법학회
- 김인현, "허베이 스피리트호 油類汚染事故의 損害賠償 및 補償의 爭點과 改善方向", 경영법률, 21(2), pp.593~622 (2011), 한국경영법률학회
- 김인현, "2003년도 海商法 判例 評釋", 한국해법학회지, 26(2), pp.201~228 (2004), 한국해법학회
- 김인현, "선박운항과 관련한 책임주체 확정에 관한 연구", 한국해법학회지, 21(1) (1999)
- 김종훈, "해상운송계약상 Knock for Knock 조항의 법적 유효성에 관한 사례연구", 무역학회지, 39(3), pp.41~67 (2014), 한국무역학회
- 박용섭, "해상예선계약의 법적 성질에 관한 고찰(상)", (하), 1981, pp.(88, 89)[DOI]
- 박용섭, "해상예선계약과 제3자에 대한 책임", 한국해법학회지, 2(1) (1980)
- 심상도, "정기용선계약에 관한 입법론적 연구 : NYPE 1946을 중심으로", 박사, 해사법학과, pp.2012
- 심재두, "정기용선자의 제3자에 대한 책임(대법원 1992. 2. 25. 선고 91다14215 판결 평석)", 한국해법회지, 16(1) (1994)
- 우보연, "예선업자의 책임에 관한 고찰", 외법논집, 34(4), pp.243~254 (2010), 법학연구소
- 이승호, "정기용선 선장의 불법행위에 대한 선주의 책임 (대법원 2003.8.22.선고 2001다65977판결)", 한국해법학회지, 26(1), pp.197~213 (2004), 한국해법학회
- 이원석, "예선계약의 법적 구성", 법학논총, 8(1) (1991), 한양대 법학연구소
- 이정원, "예선계약상 피예인선의 제3자에 대한 책임 (대법원 2010. 1. 28. 선고 2008다65686, 65693 판결)", 법학논총, 28(4), pp.259~282 (2011), 법학연구소
- 이정원, "정기용선의 외부 관계에 대한 소고", 한양법학, (33), pp.551~578 (2011), 한양법학회
- 이창희, "정기용선계약법의 개정방안에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2003
- 이춘원, "예부선 상황에서의 충돌에 관한 몇 가지 문제점", 한국해법학회지, 29(1), pp.35~54 (2007), 한국해법학회
- 장영준, "해상공사에 투입된 예·부선 용선계약의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구", 한국항해항만학회지, 38(5), pp.471~477 (2014), 한국항해항만학회[DOI]
- 정영석, "선박담보 충돌손해배상약관에서 예선열일체의 원칙의 적용문제", 해사법연구, 10(1) (1998)
- 최수정, "동산매매에 있어서의 위험 부담에 관한 연구", 박사, 민법, pp.2000
- 原茂太一, "曳船契約法論" (1970), 千倉書房
- 田中誠二, "海商法詳論" (1976), 勁草書房
- Bundock, Michael, "Shipping Law Handbook" (2011), Informa
- Carver, "Carriage by Sea" (1982), Stevens & Sons
- David G. Epstein, "Basic Uniform Commercial Code teaching materials" (1983), West Pub. Co
- Frederick Neville Hopkins, "Business & Law for the Shipmaster" (1977), Brown, Son & Ferguson
- Grant, Gilmore, "The Law of Admiralty" (1975), The Fondation Press Inc
- Ivamy, E. R. Hardy, "Carriage of Goods by Sea" (1989), Butterworths
- Larenz, Karl, "Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts Ⅱ, 13. völlig neubearbeitete" (1986), Beck
- Mandaraka-Sheppard, Aleka, "Modern Maritime Law, Vol. 2: Managing Risks and Liabilities" (2013), Informa Law
- Maraist Frank L, "Catherine M. Maraist" (2003), West Group
- Rainy, Simon, "The Law of Tug and Tow and Offshore Contracts, The Law of Tug and Tow and Offshore Contracts" (2011), Informa
- Schoenbaum, Thomas J., "Admiralty and Maritime Law" (2004), West Group
- Scrutton, "On Charter parties and Bills of Lading" (1984), Sweet & Maxwell
- Treitel, Guenter H, "Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Account" (1991), Clarendon Press
- Hewitt T., "Who is to Blame? Allocating Liability in Upstream Project Contracts", J. Energy Nat. Resources L, 26(177) (2008)
- Mankabady, Samir, "the Hamburg Rules on the Carriage of Goods by Sea" (1978), A.W. Sijthoff- Leyden