본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

丁若鏞의 神形妙合的 藝術論

Yak-young Jeong's Art Theory of the Subtle Combination of Body and Soul

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The main purpose of this paper is to show that Yak-young Jeong's art theory has the characteristic of a subtle combination of body and soul. Previous studies have defined Yak-young Jeong's calligraphy, and painting as realism or spiritualism. To be sure, it is possible that the art theory is able to be defined as realism in that it is based on reality and actuality and as spiritualism on the basis on spirit instead of form. But, these views seem to throw off their balance in the light of the fact that although Yak-young Jeong stresses on value of spirit, he grasps spirit as being relative to form, a subtle combination of body and soul. In this paper, I suggest Yak-young Jeong's art theory is the subtle combination of body and soul's theory in that it ultimately aims to reveal the spirit through the forms of reality and actuality. Yak-young Jeong's art theory seems to be important in the field of the artistic discussion these days, for the following reasons; first, it helps to expand our horizons of awareness about works of artists in the late Joseon Dynasty period, second, it shows that art can not be recognized just as aiming at beauty of forms, as well as a mean to emphasize on spirituality.

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to show that Yak-young Jeong's art theory has the characteristic of a subtle combination of body and soul. Previous studies have defined Yak-young Jeong's calligraphy, and painting as realism or spiritualism. To be sure, it is possible that the art theory is able to be defined as realism in that it is based on reality and actuality and as spiritualism on the basis on spirit instead of form. But, these views seem to throw off their balance in the light of the fact that although Yak-young Jeong stresses on value of spirit, he grasps spirit as being relative to form, a subtle combination of body and soul. In this paper, I suggest Yak-young Jeong's art theory is the subtle combination of body and soul's theory in that it ultimately aims to reveal the spirit through the forms of reality and actuality. Yak-young Jeong's art theory seems to be important in the field of the artistic discussion these days, for the following reasons; first, it helps to expand our horizons of awareness about works of artists in the late Joseon Dynasty period, second, it shows that art can not be recognized just as aiming at beauty of forms, as well as a mean to emphasize on spirituality.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 오세창, "국역 근역서화징(하)" (1998), 시공사
  2. 尹斗緖, "記拙", 海南尹氏宗家所藏
  3. 이광사, "신편 원교 이광사 문집" (2005), 시간의 물레
  4. 李奎象, "幷世才彦錄" (1997), 창작과 비평사
  5. 丁若鏞, "與猶堂全書』(computer file)", 민족문화추진위원회 한국고전번역원, ~
  6. 김남형, "조선후기 근기실학파의 예술론 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.1988
  7. 김상홍, "다산의 서예론 연구 in 다산문학의 재조명" (2003), 단국대학교 출판부
  8. 맹인재, "丁茶山의 山水圖", 미술사학연구(구고고미술), 19 (1962), 한국미술사학회
  9. 맹인재, "茶山의 梅鳥圖", 미술사학연구(구고고미술), 45 (1964), 한국미술사학회
  10. 배규하, "중국서법예술사下" (2000), 이화문화출판사
  11. 서승례, "조선후기 미불?동기창 행초서풍의 유행", 서예학연구, 6 (2005), 한국서예학회
  12. 유홍준, "조선시대 화론 연구" (1998), 학고재
  13. 윤종일, "茶山 丁若鏞 藝術論의 근대성 검토", 한국사상과 문화, 34(34), pp.173~216 (2006), 한국사상문화학회
  14. 윤종일, "다산 정약용 예술론의 문화운동사적 위치", 한국사상과 문화, 36(36), pp.185~232 (2007), 한국사상문화학회
  15. 이원형, "다산 정약용의 서화 연구", 석사, 서예학과, pp.2002
  16. 이정원, "정약용의 회화와 회화관", 석사, 사학과, pp.2004
  17. 이태호, "조선후기 회화의 사실정신" (1996), 학고재
  18. 이태호, "조선후기에 ‘카메라 옵스큐라’로 초상화를 그렸다 in 다산의 문학과 예술" (2004), 다산학술문화재단
  19. 임창순, "한국서예개관 in 한국의 미 6-서예" (1981), 중앙일보사
  20. 장복동, "다산의 실학적 인간학" (2002), 전남대학교 출판부
  21. 장지훈, "다산 정약용의 실학정신과 서예비평", 동양예술논총, 10 (2006), 강암서예학술재단
  22. 최완수, "秋史書派考", 간송문화, 19 (1980), 한국민족미술연구소
  23. 최완수, "조선왕조 서예사 개론 in 조선 후기 서예전", 예술의 전당, ~ (1990)
  24. 홍선표, "조선 후기의 회화관-실학파의 회화관을 중심으로 in『산수화』(하) 한국의 미 12권", 중앙일보계간미술, ~ (1982)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)