容齋 李荇의 屈原 수용과 문학적 변용-동일화와 거리 두기 그 긴장과 공존-
Acceptance of Literature of Qu Yuan(屈原) and Changes in Aspects of Literature of Yongjae(容齋) Lee Haeng(李荇) -Tension and Coexistance in Identification and Distance-
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper explored the characteristics in acceptance of literature of Qu Yuan and aspects of changes through literature of Yongjae Lee Haeng(1478~1534) who represents his time based on the decision that Purge of Literati was a turning point to accept Qu Yuan. Lee Haeng was involved in Gapja(甲子) Purge and lived in Chungju(忠州), Haman(咸安), and Geojaedo in exile for three years. He published three collections of his poems written in exile. The collections contain about 30 works which accept Qu Yuan. The only prose titled <離騷後拔> advocates Qu Yuan, representing the view of the person who suffered the purge. Also, in his poetry, he would sympathize with Qu Yuan by inviting his own gloom. In the entire work, he would materialize the internal world or atmosphere of Qu Yuan and his works. In terms of qualitative performance, the latter excels. On the other hand, his works consistently show a certain attitude to distance from Qu Yuan. His poetry may declare the ‘difference’ from Qu Yuan and use a parody to create the opposite meaning. The freshness of the message or personality in literature literary are more prominent in the works than those of identification. The identification and distance are selective, rather than contradictory, in orientation. He was in sufficient sympathy with loyalty, respect for the king, and good politics. However, Lee Haeng did not agree to the situation where Qu Yuan fought the world intensively and chose to kill himself to disappear. At least, he did not choose the latter way. As for the former, there appears complete identification of Lee Haeng with Qu Yuan. In the latter, there is complete differentiation from Qu Yuan. The most important characteristic is that the two attitudes coexist in tension. While the works of art by Lee Haeng, collected through acceptance of Qu Yuan work as a pioneer to raise questions of the day, there are personal characteristics and attitudes in life, creating unique literature. Especially, if you focus on the ‘difference’ from Qu Yuan, you will understand the conditions where he becomes a new meritorious subject upon return with King Jungjong(中宗). The works by Lee Haeng through acceptance of Qu Yuan are unique among the literati during the purge period and ensure a meaningful position in the history of literature by those in political exile.
Abstract
This paper explored the characteristics in acceptance of literature of Qu Yuan and aspects of changes through literature of Yongjae Lee Haeng(1478~1534) who represents his time based on the decision that Purge of Literati was a turning point to accept Qu Yuan. Lee Haeng was involved in Gapja(甲子) Purge and lived in Chungju(忠州), Haman(咸安), and Geojaedo in exile for three years. He published three collections of his poems written in exile. The collections contain about 30 works which accept Qu Yuan. The only prose titled <離騷後拔> advocates Qu Yuan, representing the view of the person who suffered the purge. Also, in his poetry, he would sympathize with Qu Yuan by inviting his own gloom. In the entire work, he would materialize the internal world or atmosphere of Qu Yuan and his works. In terms of qualitative performance, the latter excels. On the other hand, his works consistently show a certain attitude to distance from Qu Yuan. His poetry may declare the ‘difference’ from Qu Yuan and use a parody to create the opposite meaning. The freshness of the message or personality in literature literary are more prominent in the works than those of identification. The identification and distance are selective, rather than contradictory, in orientation. He was in sufficient sympathy with loyalty, respect for the king, and good politics. However, Lee Haeng did not agree to the situation where Qu Yuan fought the world intensively and chose to kill himself to disappear. At least, he did not choose the latter way. As for the former, there appears complete identification of Lee Haeng with Qu Yuan. In the latter, there is complete differentiation from Qu Yuan. The most important characteristic is that the two attitudes coexist in tension. While the works of art by Lee Haeng, collected through acceptance of Qu Yuan work as a pioneer to raise questions of the day, there are personal characteristics and attitudes in life, creating unique literature. Especially, if you focus on the ‘difference’ from Qu Yuan, you will understand the conditions where he becomes a new meritorious subject upon return with King Jungjong(中宗). The works by Lee Haeng through acceptance of Qu Yuan are unique among the literati during the purge period and ensure a meaningful position in the history of literature by those in political exile.
참고문헌 (37)
- 이행, "容齋集. (한국문집총간 20집)", ~
- 정희량, "虛庵遺集. (한국문집총간 18집)", ~
- 홍언충, "寓菴稿. (한국문집총간 18집)", ~
- 곽정연, "동일화와 거리두기 - 엘프리데 옐리네크의 소설 <피아노 치는 여자>와 미하엘 하네케의 영화 <피아니스트> 비교 연구", 카프카 연구, (17), pp.101~123 (2007), 한국카프카학회
- 김기림, "李荇의 詩世界 硏究", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1996
- 김범, "사화와 반정의 시대" (2008), 역사비평사
- 김범, "연산군-그 인간과 시대의 내면" (2010), 글항아리
- 김보경, "寓菴 洪彦忠의 시에 나타난 巨濟島의 표상과 유배체험의 형상화 양상", 韓國古典硏究, (26), pp.175~212 (2012), 한국고전연구학회
- 김연수, "허암 정희량의 자아인식과 의식지향", 어문논집, 43 (2001), 민족어문학회
- 김원중, "중국 문화의 이해" (1998), 을유문화사
- 김은지, "이행의 유배시에 나타난 정서연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2005
- 김진경, "한국 사부의 사적 전개에 관한 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2005
- 노장시, "韓愈의 "不平則鳴"說에 대한 小考 -<送孟東野序>의 내용을 중심으로-", 중국어문학, (45), pp.259~282 (2005), 영남중국어문학회
- 민병수, "정희량의 시세계", 한국한시작가연구, 4 (1999), 한국한시학회
- 범선균, "한국고전시가에 끼친 굴원의 영향", 중어중문학, 10 (1988), 한국중어중문학회
- 신두환, "朝鮮士人들의 ‘楚辭’ 受容과 그 美意識", 한문학논집(漢文學論集), 30, pp.55~82 (2010), 근역한문학회
- 심경호, "조선조의 杜詩集 간행에 관하여, In 한국학보 11" (1985), 일지사
- 안병학, "이행의 시세계에 있어서의 현실긍정과 풍류", 태동고전연구, 3 (1987), 대통고전연구회
- 우정임, "조선전기 성리서의 간행과 유통에 관한 연구", 박사, 사학, pp.2009
- 柳年錫, "梅溪 曺偉의 <萬憤歌> 硏究", 한국고시가문화연구, (10), pp.93~135 (2002), 한국고시가문화학회
- 유선원, "굴원 문학이 한국시가에 끼친 영향", 석사, 국어국문학과, pp.2013
- 윤인현, "李奎報의 ?屈原不宜死論?에 나타난 歷史意識의 문제점", 한국한문학연구, (38), pp.69~114 (2006), 한국한문학회
- 이은영, "士禍期 한 젊은 사대부의 肖像 - 虛庵 鄭希良論 -", 동양한문학연구, 29(29), pp.27~57 (2009), 동양한문학회
- 이재숙, "용재 이행의 한시 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2009
- 이종묵, "조선전기 위리안치의 체험과 그 형상화", 한국문화연구, 9 (2005), 이화여자대학교 한국문화연구원
- 이창룡, "매월당의 굴원 수용양상", 국어국문학, 91 (1984), 국어국문학회
- 이창희, "용재 이행 한시의 연구", 박사, pp.1998
- 이택후, "華夏美學" (1990), 동문선
- 이형대, "한국 고전시가와 인물 형상의 동아시아적 변전" (2002), 소명출판
- 정경주, "성종조 신진사류의 문학세계" (1993), 법인문화사
- 정끝별, "패러디 시학" (1997), 문학세계사
- 정일남, "徐居正 詩의 楚辭 受容 樣相", 漢文學報, 21, pp.209~238 (2009), 우리한문학회
- 채미현, "문학적 인물형상 ‘漁父’창출의 始原的 특징", 중국어문학논집, (75), pp.433~454 (2012), 중국어문학연구회[DOI]
- 최재남, "체험서정시의 내면화 양상 연구" (2012), 보고사
- 한종진, "주자는 왜 초사집주를 썼는가?" (2007), 한국학술정보
- 한효남, "<이소>의 양면성 고찰 : 정치서정시적 측면과 무가적 측면을 중심으로", 석사, 중어중문학, pp.2010
- 홍순석, "용재 이행 시의 한 고찰", 한문학논집, 4 (1986), 단국대학교 한문학회
