郭鍾錫의 『中庸』 分節說
A Study on Gwak Jong-Seok's Jungyong Bunjeolseol
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The paper presets an investigation into the Bunjeolseol of the Jungyong interpretations by Gwak Jong-seok(1846-1919), a scholar from Gyeongsang- woodo in the late 19th century. The conclusions are summarized as follows:The analysis results of the content of Gwak's Sajiyukjeolseol show that he basically accepted his master Lee Jin-sang's viewpoint of interpretation to put together Saji and Yukjeol and, at the same time, changed the names of the four major Jis different from Lee's theory. He changed the name of the first major Ji to "Jungyongdaeji. It was the same with the names of six major Jeols. He changed them based on the six major Jeol Yoji of Dokjungyongbeop instead of following Lee's theory. Gwak had many arguments over the name of the first major Ji with his predecessor Heo Yu over several years. He maintained his position on "Jungyongdaeji," never accepting Heo's argument for "Junghwadaeji" to the end. He wrote Jungyongjijeolbyeoldo, establishing his own theory that "Jungyong" could be the name of all including the whole, Saji, and Yukjeol. Gwak's Sajiyukjeolseol can be characterized as follows: first, given that his theories on the four major Jis and six major Jeols were based on the "Jibunjeolhae" of Jungyongjangguseo, he tried to put them together to understand them from the perspective that both of them could not be discarded. Secondly, he understood the logical structure of Jungyong centered around Daeji and systemized it into the whole-Saji-Yukjeol. Finally, he wrote Jungyongjijeoldo from a different perspective from Lee Jin-sang and Heo Yu. The characteristics of his Jungyongjijeoldo are as follows: ① he identified the Heaven of Jungyong with Taegeuk of Taegeukdoseol and embodied the Heaven by drawing a circle and the Earth by drawing a square inside the circle; ② he added "Gyecheonipgeuk" to "Jibunjeolhae" and "Maekrakgwantong" of Jungyongjangguseo, thus highlighting its meanings; and ③ he analyzed the logical structure of Jungyong by combining Zhu Xi's statement of "Jibunjeolhae Maekrakgwantong" in Jungyongjangguseo and Jeongja's statement of "Shieonili Jungsanwiman- samalbuhapwuiili."
Abstract
The paper presets an investigation into the Bunjeolseol of the Jungyong interpretations by Gwak Jong-seok(1846-1919), a scholar from Gyeongsang- woodo in the late 19th century. The conclusions are summarized as follows:The analysis results of the content of Gwak's Sajiyukjeolseol show that he basically accepted his master Lee Jin-sang's viewpoint of interpretation to put together Saji and Yukjeol and, at the same time, changed the names of the four major Jis different from Lee's theory. He changed the name of the first major Ji to "Jungyongdaeji. It was the same with the names of six major Jeols. He changed them based on the six major Jeol Yoji of Dokjungyongbeop instead of following Lee's theory. Gwak had many arguments over the name of the first major Ji with his predecessor Heo Yu over several years. He maintained his position on "Jungyongdaeji," never accepting Heo's argument for "Junghwadaeji" to the end. He wrote Jungyongjijeolbyeoldo, establishing his own theory that "Jungyong" could be the name of all including the whole, Saji, and Yukjeol. Gwak's Sajiyukjeolseol can be characterized as follows: first, given that his theories on the four major Jis and six major Jeols were based on the "Jibunjeolhae" of Jungyongjangguseo, he tried to put them together to understand them from the perspective that both of them could not be discarded. Secondly, he understood the logical structure of Jungyong centered around Daeji and systemized it into the whole-Saji-Yukjeol. Finally, he wrote Jungyongjijeoldo from a different perspective from Lee Jin-sang and Heo Yu. The characteristics of his Jungyongjijeoldo are as follows: ① he identified the Heaven of Jungyong with Taegeuk of Taegeukdoseol and embodied the Heaven by drawing a circle and the Earth by drawing a square inside the circle; ② he added "Gyecheonipgeuk" to "Jibunjeolhae" and "Maekrakgwantong" of Jungyongjangguseo, thus highlighting its meanings; and ③ he analyzed the logical structure of Jungyong by combining Zhu Xi's statement of "Jibunjeolhae Maekrakgwantong" in Jungyongjangguseo and Jeongja's statement of "Shieonili Jungsanwiman- samalbuhapwuiili."
참고문헌 (31)
- 姜永墀, "睡齋集", 경상대 도서관 문천각, ~
- 景星, "四書集說啓蒙(문연각 사고전서 제210책)", ~
- 郭鍾錫, "茶田經義答問" (1984), 매산출판사
- 郭鍾錫, "俛宇集, 제1책" (1983), 아세아문화사
- 權近, "入學圖說" (1974), 을유문화사
- 金幹, "厚齋集" (1995), 한국고전번역원
- 金榥, "重齋先生文集" (1988), 중재선생문집간행회
- 朴世采, "南溪集" (1994), 한국고전번역원
- 史伯璿, "四書管窺(문연각 사고전서 제201책)", ~
- 李瀷, "星湖全集" (1997), 한국고전번역원
- 李震相, "求志錄-中庸箚疑" (1980), 아세아문화사
- 李震相, "寒洲集" (2003), 한국고전번역원
- 李泰壽, "止谷遺稿", 국립중앙도서관, ~
- 李顯益, "正菴集" (2008), 한국고전번역원
- 張顯光, "易學圖說(旅軒先生全書 下冊)", ~ (1983)
- 周琦, "東溪日談錄(문연각 사고전서 제205책)", ~
- 蔡淸, "四書蒙引(문연각 사고전서 제206책)", ~
- 夏尙樸, "東巖集(문연각 사고전서 제207책)", ~
- 韓元震, "經義記聞錄-中庸, In 한국경학가자료집성 제11책" (1989), 성균관대 대동문화연구원
- 許愈, "后山集" (1999), 후산서당
- 胡廣, "중용장구대전", 학민문화사
- 胡炳文, "四書通(문연각 사고전서 제210책)", ~
- 李相夏, "寒洲 李震相의 主理論 硏究" (2004), 경인문화사
- 최석기, "陽村 權近의 <大學>解釋과 그 意味", 漢文學報, 8(1), pp.81~115 (2003), 우리한문학회
- 解釋과 그 意味, "南冥學硏究", 2004, 163~214, pp.경남문화연구원
- 최석기, "南塘 韓元震의 中庸 解釋 方法과 그 成果", 漢文學報, 16(1), pp.217~250 (2007), 우리한문학회
- 최석기, "『中庸』의 分節問題와 崔象龍의 解釋", 漢文學報, 19, pp.1265~1291 (2008), 우리한문학회
- 최석기, "遁翁 韓汝愈의 『中庸』解釋과 그 意味", 대동한문학(大東漢文學), (30), pp.323~360 (2009), 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회)
- 최석기, "南圃 金萬英의 『中庸』 해석과 그 의미", 漢文學報, 23, pp.313~346 (2010), 우리한문학회
- 최석기, "寒洲 李震相의 『中庸』分節說", 동양한문학연구, 34(34), pp.305~340 (2012), 동양한문학회
- 홍원식, "면우 곽종석의 성리설 - 한주 성리설의 계승을 중심으로", 南冥學硏究, (27), pp.71~92 (2009), 경남문화연구원
