본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선시대 梅花詩의 전개와 특징

Developments and Characteristics of Plum Blossom Poetry in Joseon Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

19

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The plum blossom is regarded as the tree embodying most fully the principleof continuously giving life in the Neo-Confucian tradition, because it beginsto flower in the cold winter. For this symbolic signification, the plum blossombecame one of the most beloved subjects of Neo-Confucian literati's poetryin Joseon Korea. In this paper, I divide the history of plum blossom poetryin Joseon Korea into three time periods and discuss some representative poetsand their salient features in each period. In the early period, Seo Geo-jeong, Kim Si-seup and Kim An-ro producednotable poems on the subject of plum blossom. The image of an outsiderrejecting the hoi polloi and leading a cloistered life was expressed in Kim'sSi-seup's and playfulness was fully exploited in Kim An-ro's. In the middleperiod, Yi Hwang, his disciples, and an Andong Kim family (Su-jeung,Chang-hyeop, and Chang-heup) are noteworthy. Yi Hwang, who studied deeplythe learning of mind-and-heart and emphasized the self-cultivation of innerlife, not just composed many poems on the plum blossom but also enjoyed poemgiving-and-taking with his disciples. In fact, Yi invented a new style of'plum-blossom conversation poetry' by composing a poem repeating a patternof poet's questioning and replying to his imagined interlocutor plum blossom:about the meaning of pureness and truthfulness and the principles of advancingtoward/retreating away from government service. This style attracted manyreaders and influenced several later poets, to a great extent. Kim Su-jeung,Chang-hyeop, and Chang-heup felt doubts seriously about the political life andfactional strives of Joseon court and searched for ways of becoming the truehermit. In so doing, they composed many poems on the plum, where we cansee some influences of Shao Yong's numerological cosmology. In the late period, we can see developments of poetry societies and their collective works of plumblossom poetry especially in the late 18th century: for example, Noron (the Elderfaction) literati's poem entitled "Bingdeung jobin yeon" (A winter night feastfor poets), a Seoulite plum society's poems, and Yi Deok-mu's and his friends'poems on the plum blossoming in the spring month of the lunar calendar. Allthese exhibited a new trend that emerged in the late period of Joseon Korea. In the 19th century, Sin Wi, Jeong Hak-yeon, Jo Byeong-hyeon, and YiHak-gyu created respectively scores of poems on the plum blossom. Inparticular, adopting the style of Ju Yunming's "Meihua baiyong" (One hundredsongs of the plum blossom), Sin and Jeong wrote several serial poems on theplum blossom. The most strong and consistent meaning of plum blossom poetry in JoseonKorea can be seen as coming from the symbolic signification of the hexagramFu (returing) in I Ching. The underlying reason why such many Korean Neo-Confucian literati did persistently write poems on the subject of plum blossommight be that the blossoming of plum in the winter solstice offered them somemoments to reflect on nature's principle of continuously giving life and therebyencouraged them to realize Heaven's way in accordance with their Neo-Confucianism.

Abstract

The plum blossom is regarded as the tree embodying most fully the principleof continuously giving life in the Neo-Confucian tradition, because it beginsto flower in the cold winter. For this symbolic signification, the plum blossombecame one of the most beloved subjects of Neo-Confucian literati's poetryin Joseon Korea. In this paper, I divide the history of plum blossom poetryin Joseon Korea into three time periods and discuss some representative poetsand their salient features in each period. In the early period, Seo Geo-jeong, Kim Si-seup and Kim An-ro producednotable poems on the subject of plum blossom. The image of an outsiderrejecting the hoi polloi and leading a cloistered life was expressed in Kim'sSi-seup's and playfulness was fully exploited in Kim An-ro's. In the middleperiod, Yi Hwang, his disciples, and an Andong Kim family (Su-jeung,Chang-hyeop, and Chang-heup) are noteworthy. Yi Hwang, who studied deeplythe learning of mind-and-heart and emphasized the self-cultivation of innerlife, not just composed many poems on the plum blossom but also enjoyed poemgiving-and-taking with his disciples. In fact, Yi invented a new style of'plum-blossom conversation poetry' by composing a poem repeating a patternof poet's questioning and replying to his imagined interlocutor plum blossom:about the meaning of pureness and truthfulness and the principles of advancingtoward/retreating away from government service. This style attracted manyreaders and influenced several later poets, to a great extent. Kim Su-jeung,Chang-hyeop, and Chang-heup felt doubts seriously about the political life andfactional strives of Joseon court and searched for ways of becoming the truehermit. In so doing, they composed many poems on the plum, where we cansee some influences of Shao Yong's numerological cosmology. In the late period, we can see developments of poetry societies and their collective works of plumblossom poetry especially in the late 18th century: for example, Noron (the Elderfaction) literati's poem entitled "Bingdeung jobin yeon" (A winter night feastfor poets), a Seoulite plum society's poems, and Yi Deok-mu's and his friends'poems on the plum blossoming in the spring month of the lunar calendar. Allthese exhibited a new trend that emerged in the late period of Joseon Korea. In the 19th century, Sin Wi, Jeong Hak-yeon, Jo Byeong-hyeon, and YiHak-gyu created respectively scores of poems on the plum blossom. Inparticular, adopting the style of Ju Yunming's "Meihua baiyong" (One hundredsongs of the plum blossom), Sin and Jeong wrote several serial poems on theplum blossom. The most strong and consistent meaning of plum blossom poetry in JoseonKorea can be seen as coming from the symbolic signification of the hexagramFu (returing) in I Ching. The underlying reason why such many Korean Neo-Confucian literati did persistently write poems on the subject of plum blossommight be that the blossoming of plum in the winter solstice offered them somemoments to reflect on nature's principle of continuously giving life and therebyencouraged them to realize Heaven's way in accordance with their Neo-Confucianism.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. 金守溫, "拭疣集" (1988), 민족문화추진회
  2. 金壽增, "谷雲集" (1994), 민족문화추진회
  3. 金安老, "希樂堂稿" (1988), 민족문화추진회
  4. 金正喜, "阮堂全集" (2003), 민족문화추진회
  5. 金昌協, "農巖集" (1988), 민족문화추진회
  6. 奇大升, "高峰集" (1986), 민족문화추진회
  7. 金富弼, "後彫堂集" (2005), 민족문화추진회
  8. 金昌翕, "三淵集" (1996), 민족문화추진회
  9. 杜甫, "杜詩詳註(사고전서 전자판)", ~
  10. 李秉淵, "槎川詩抄" (2008), 민족문화추진회
  11. 朴允默, "存齋集" (2002), 민족문화추진회
  12. 方回, "瀛奎律髓" (1994), 黃山書社
  13. 白斗鏞, "箋註四家詩" (1917), 한남서림
  14. 徐居正, "四佳集" (1988), 민족문화추진회
  15. 孫舜孝, "勿齋集" (2005), 민족문화추진회
  16. 申緯, "警修堂全藁" (2002), 민족문화추진회
  17. 심재, "송천필담" (2009), 보고사
  18. 유재건, "이향견문록" (1997), 민음사
  19. 이규상, "18세기 조선 인물지-병세재언록" (1997), 창작과비평사
  20. 李德懋, "國譯 靑莊館全書" (1978), 민족문화문고간행회
  21. 李尙迪, "恩誦堂集" (2003), 민족문화추진회
  22. 이옥, "완역 이옥전집" (2009), 휴머니스트
  23. 李胤永, "丹陵遺稿" (1983), 한산문헌간행회
  24. 李瀷, "國譯 星湖僿說" (1977), 민족문화추진회
  25. 李學逵, "洛下生集" (2002), 민족문화추진회
  26. 이황, "퇴계 매화시첩" (2007), 보고사
  27. 이황, "다시 도산 매화를 찾아" (1995), 창작과비평사
  28. 李滉, "梅花詩帖", 한국학중앙연구원 장서각, ~
  29. 李滉, "退溪集" (1988), 민족문화추진회
  30. 李頤淳, "後溪集" (2001), 민족문화추진회
  31. 丁學淵, "鮮音", 한국학중앙연구원 장서각, ~
  32. 趙秉鉉, "成齋集" (2003), 민족문화추진회
  33. 趙載浩, "梅社五詠", 국립중앙도서관, ~
  34. 조희룡, "조희룡전집" (1999), 한길아트
  35. 黃庭堅, "山谷集(사고전서 전자판)", ~
  36. "高麗名賢集" (1973), 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원
  37. "東文選" (1975), 민족문화추진회
  38. "詩經", ~
  39. 김종서, "이덕무가 밀랍으로 만든 윤회매 이야기", 문헌과해석, (12) (2002), 문헌과해석사
  40. 김지영, "丁學淵의 매화 연작시 『梅花三十首』에 대한 一考", 藏書閣, (25), pp.136~162 (2011), 한국학중앙연구원
  41. 박혜숙, "조선의 梅花詩", 한국한문학연구, 26 (2000), 한국한문학회
  42. 신익철, "이봉환의 椒林體와 ‘落花詩’에 대하여", 한국한문학연구, 24 (1999), 한국한문학회
  43. 신익철, "18세기 매화시의 세 가지 양상", 한국시가연구, (15), pp.97~126 (2004), 한국시가학회
  44. 신익철, "詩選集 鮮音과 丁學淵 가을 연작시의 정서", 藏書閣, (13), pp.47~66 (2005), 한국학중앙연구원
  45. 신익철, "茶山과 다산학단의 菊影詩 창작과 그 의미 - 원굉도 문학의 수용 양상과 관련하여 -", 한국실학연구, (16), pp.129~159 (2008), 한국실학학회
  46. 안대회, "한국 충어초목화훼시의 전개와 특징", 한국문학연구, (2) (2001), 고려대 민족문화연구원 한국문화연구소
  47. 여희정, "金昌翕 매화시의 특징 : 「松栢堂詠梅」를 중심으로", 한국한문학연구, (48), pp.255~293 (2011), 한국한문학회
  48. 윤호진, "문학작품에 나타난 문화콘텐츠로서의 매화", 호남문화연구, 1(40), pp.1~36 (2007), 호남학연구원
  49. 이선옥, "조선시대 매화도 연구", 박사, 예술, pp.2004
  50. 이선옥, "매화" (2003), 생각의 나무
  51. 이우성, "이퇴계와 서원창설운동", 퇴계학보, 19 (1978), 퇴계학연구원
  52. 이창일, "소강절의 철학" (2007), 심산
  53. 정은주, "이학규의 화훼 취미와 菊影詩 창작", 인문과학, (49), pp.185~204 (2012), 인문학연구원
  54. 池田溫, "从≪梅花百咏≫看日中文学交流", 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 33 (2003), 浙江大学出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)