본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effects of Different Types of Firm R&D on Foreign Market Performance: Evidence from Korean Firms

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류무역학

초록

This paper examines the effects of firm R&D on exports and foreign direct investment (FDI) by using Korean firm data. To provide in-depth analysis on R&D effects, we estimate the effects of technical innovation R&D and production process R&D by using recursive structural equation model. Taking into account that technical innovation is associated with product-specific quality, while production process innovation affects firm-specific productivity, we use firm productivity as a mediator variable to estimate the effects of firm R&D with and without incorporating firm productivity in the model. Our results show that firm R&D is more effective on increasing exports and FDI directly than indirectly through firm productivity change. Estimating firm R&D effects across different industry sectors, we find that firm R&D has significant impact on exports and FDI directly and indirectly through total factor productivity change among capital-intensive sectors, while it has significant effects on exports through labor productivity change insidelabor-intensive sectors. Our results provide evidence that while technical innovation R&D is more effective on improving foreign market performance, different types of R&D activities have different effects depending on industry characteristics.

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of firm R&D on exports and foreign direct investment (FDI) by using Korean firm data. To provide in-depth analysis on R&D effects, we estimate the effects of technical innovation R&D and production process R&D by using recursive structural equation model. Taking into account that technical innovation is associated with product-specific quality, while production process innovation affects firm-specific productivity, we use firm productivity as a mediator variable to estimate the effects of firm R&D with and without incorporating firm productivity in the model. Our results show that firm R&D is more effective on increasing exports and FDI directly than indirectly through firm productivity change. Estimating firm R&D effects across different industry sectors, we find that firm R&D has significant impact on exports and FDI directly and indirectly through total factor productivity change among capital-intensive sectors, while it has significant effects on exports through labor productivity change insidelabor-intensive sectors. Our results provide evidence that while technical innovation R&D is more effective on improving foreign market performance, different types of R&D activities have different effects depending on industry characteristics.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. The impact of R&D and FDI on firm growth in emerging-developing countries: evidence from Indian manufacturing industries, "Adamos, A.", Madras School, ~, pp.Madras School of Economic Policy Working Paper, 37 (2007)
  2. Aw, B. Y., "Firm heterogeneity and location choice of Taiwanese multinationals", Journal of International Economics, 75(1), pp.167~179 (2008)
  3. Banbury, C. M., "The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival", Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), pp.161~182 (1995)
  4. Basile, R., "Export behaviour of Italian manufacturing firms over the nineties: the role of innovation", Research policy, 30(8), pp.1185~1201 (2001)
  5. Bentler, P. M., "Tests for stability in linear structural equation systems", Psychometrika, 48, pp.143~145 (1983)
  6. Coad, A., "On the autocorrelation of growth rates", Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 9(2), pp.139~166 (2009)
  7. Fox, J., "Effect analysis in structural equation models", Sociological Methods and Research, 9, pp.3~28 (1980)
  8. Griliches, Z., "Productivity, R&D, and basic research at the firm level in the 1970’s", The American Economic Review, 76(1), pp.141~154 (1986)
  9. Griliches, Z., "&D and productivity: The unfinished business", Estudios de Economia, 25, pp.269~283 (1998)
  10. Productivity and R&D at the firm level, "Griliches, Z.", NBER, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper, No. 8343 (1981)
  11. Helpman, E., "Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms", American Economic Review, 94(1), pp.300~316 (2004)
  12. Hirsch, S., "R&D intensity and export performance: a micro view", Weltwirtschaftliches archiv, 121(2), pp.238~251 (1985)
  13. Analysis on the national R&D investment activities of major countries in 2009, "KISTEP", Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning, ~ (2010)
  14. Survey of research and development in Korea, "KISTEP", Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning, ~ (2012)
  15. Kogut, B., "Technological capabilities and Japanese foreign direct investment in the United States", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(3), pp.401~413 (1991)
  16. Kumar, N., "Technology, firm size and export behavior in developing countries: the case of Indian enterprises", The Journal of Development Studies, 31(2), pp.289~309 (1994)
  17. Anti-Dumping Duty and Firm Heterogeneity:Evidence from Korea, "Lee, S.", KIEP, ~, pp.KIEP Working Paper, 13-04 (2013)
  18. R&D effects on firm productivity, exports, and OFDI: Korean firm-level analysis, "Lee, S.", KIEP, ~, pp.KIEP, Policy Analysis, 14-08 (2014)
  19. Lin, H., "The interdependence between FDI and R&D: an application of an endogenous switching model to Taiwan’s electronics industry", Applied Economics, 37(15), pp.1789~1799 (2005)
  20. Lu, J., "Motives for outward FDI of Chinese private firms: Firm resources, industry dynamics, and government policies", Management and Organization Review, 7(2), pp.223~248 (2011)
  21. MacKinnon, D. P., "A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects", Psychological methods, 7(1), pp.83~104 (2002)
  22. R&D productivity: A survey of econometric studies at the firm level, "Mairesse, J.", NBER, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper, No. 3666 (1991)
  23. Melitz, M. J., "The impact of trade on aggregate industry productivity and intra-industry reallocations", Econometrica, 71(6), pp.1695~1725 (2003)
  24. Nocke, V., "Cross-border mergers and acquisitions vs. greenfield foreign direct investment: The role of firm heterogeneity", Journal of International Economics, 72(2), pp.336~365 (2007)
  25. Olley, G. S., "The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry", Econometrica, 64(6), pp.1263~1297 (1996)
  26. Schreyer, P., "High-growth firms and employment" (2000), OECD Publishing
  27. Sobel, M. E., "Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models", Sociological methodology, 13, pp.290~312 (1982)
  28. Sobel, M. E., "Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models", Sociological methodology, 16, pp.159~186 (1986)
  29. Tomiura, E., "Technological capability and FDI in Asia : Firm-level relationships among Japanese manufacturers", Asian Economic Journal, 19(3), pp.273~289 (2005)
  30. Tomiura, E., "Effects of R&D and networking on the export decision of Japanese firms", Research Policy, 36(5), pp.758~767 (2007)
  31. Wagner, J., "A note on the firm size–export relationship", Small Business Economics, 7(4), pp.229~237 (2001)
  32. Wakelin, K., "Innovation and export behavior at the firm level", Research policy, 26(7), pp.829~841 (1998)
  33. Yang, C., "Developing employment effects of innovations:microeconometric evidence from Taiwan", The Developing Economies, 46(2), pp.109~134 (2008)
  34. Yang, C., "R&D, productivity, and exports: Plant-level evidence from Indonesia", Economic Modelling, 29(2), pp.208~216 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)