여성의 종중구성원 자격
About admitting women as a member of the family of the same clan
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Up to now the judicial precedent showed that the families of the same clan were originally the natural group from families of the same clan or the group of same clan put together as members of manhood among decendants of the joint ancestors to protect their ancestors' graves, to perform sacrificial rites and to improve friendly relations each other, and also admitted just manhood of the joint ancestors to families' member. However it was reasonable that every descendant of joint ancestors regardless of sex or age should be the member of families of the same clan. In my opinion, it is proper that the new judicial precedent by all members' agreement admits every womanhood as well as every manhood as the member of families of the same clan. There are several proper reasons why we can't help giving womanhood the qualification as member of families of the same clan as follows :First, the thought on its community or the families of the same clan has generally changed like these : the development of Individualism, the improvement in social position of women, parents' supporting of women and the change of new family system etc. Second, in our current society the order of law has changed like these : the equality of both sexes, the identical distribution of succession. Third, the social customs like the woman's participation for sacrificial ceremony, the woman's registration for her genealogy(family tree) have changed as well. Finally in addition, there's no wonder that the woman who has no brothers have to perform sacrificial rites and keep her ancestors' graves. I still think it improper that our judicial precedent considers the member of family of same clan and the member of family meeting as the same concept, and so we have to tell the differences between both of them to solve the issues basically on the family of the same clan. In conclusion, every family of the same clan should allow every woman the qulification as a member, but each family of the same clan can decide its own regulations as a member of family meeting according to the rules of each family of the same clan.
Abstract
Up to now the judicial precedent showed that the families of the same clan were originally the natural group from families of the same clan or the group of same clan put together as members of manhood among decendants of the joint ancestors to protect their ancestors' graves, to perform sacrificial rites and to improve friendly relations each other, and also admitted just manhood of the joint ancestors to families' member. However it was reasonable that every descendant of joint ancestors regardless of sex or age should be the member of families of the same clan. In my opinion, it is proper that the new judicial precedent by all members' agreement admits every womanhood as well as every manhood as the member of families of the same clan. There are several proper reasons why we can't help giving womanhood the qualification as member of families of the same clan as follows :First, the thought on its community or the families of the same clan has generally changed like these : the development of Individualism, the improvement in social position of women, parents' supporting of women and the change of new family system etc. Second, in our current society the order of law has changed like these : the equality of both sexes, the identical distribution of succession. Third, the social customs like the woman's participation for sacrificial ceremony, the woman's registration for her genealogy(family tree) have changed as well. Finally in addition, there's no wonder that the woman who has no brothers have to perform sacrificial rites and keep her ancestors' graves. I still think it improper that our judicial precedent considers the member of family of same clan and the member of family meeting as the same concept, and so we have to tell the differences between both of them to solve the issues basically on the family of the same clan. In conclusion, every family of the same clan should allow every woman the qulification as a member, but each family of the same clan can decide its own regulations as a member of family meeting according to the rules of each family of the same clan.
참고문헌 (14)
- 강태성, "민법총칙" (2003), 대명출판사
- 고상룡, "민법총칙" (1993), 법문사
- 곽윤직, "민법총칙" (2006), 박영사
- 김두헌, "한국가족제도연구" (1969), 서울대출판부
- 문영화, "종원의 자격을 성년 남자로 제한하는 종래 관습법의 효력. in: 21세기의 사법의 전개" (2005), 박영사
- 심희기, "조선후기 종중의 단체성과 소유형태", 법사학연구, (10) (1989)
- 이덕승, "권리능력없는 사단에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1995
- 이동명, "종중에 대한 법적 규율―관습에서 성문의 법률로―", 민사판례연구, 19 (1997), 박영사
- 이우석, "종원에 대한 대법원 전원합의체의 의의와 문제점-자연발생적 단체설의 문제를 중심으로", 민사법의 이론과 실무학회 추계학술발표문
- 이화숙, "종중의 여성문제", 현대민사법 연구 (2002), 법문사
- 정긍식, "종중재산의 법적문제―조선고등법원판결을 중심으로―", 법제연구, 통권 : 4 (1993)
- 최병주, "종손권", 사법협회잡지, 17(1) (1940)
- 허규, "종중재산에 관한 제고찰", 사법논집, 4 (1973)
- 大邱覆審法院, "민사 제3부 문의, 동년 3. 30. 중추원의장회답", 사법협회잡지, 19(5)
