Comparative Perspectives Ensure Ordoliberalism’s Relevance
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Ordoliberalism broadens the scope of economic analysis to include philosophical and political issues such as the type of society we want to live in and the “preferences” and “values” we should give precedence to. By doing so, it accepts the notion of PPE (Philosophy, Politics, and Economics). As a result of the realization that the tools and approaches from all three disciplines are required to advance on many social problems, we are currently witnessing a reintegration of these disciplines in the shape of a convergent research agenda. The major objective of contemporary ordoliberalism cannot be the development of policies for preconceived economic aims. Ordoliberals must instead think about how to organize and improve the caliber of public discussion on the goals themselves. In order to contribute to a more informed democratic discourse, modern ordoliberals should be scientifically oriented, open to normative arguments, and well-equipped with enough humility to admit their own ignorance. Only then can ordoliberalism become a persistent tradition. There should be more comparative studies that focus on German economic policies for this reason. To highlight the complex features of German economic institutions formed in ordoliberalism, it is crucial to compare them to their Anglo-American counterparts on the relevant themes. German studies must be based on ordoliberalism, and theoretical and applied discourses must coexist. Making the most of ordoliberal practicality will enable the development of the national economy as well as a sophisticated society.
Abstract
Ordoliberalism broadens the scope of economic analysis to include philosophical and political issues such as the type of society we want to live in and the “preferences” and “values” we should give precedence to. By doing so, it accepts the notion of PPE (Philosophy, Politics, and Economics). As a result of the realization that the tools and approaches from all three disciplines are required to advance on many social problems, we are currently witnessing a reintegration of these disciplines in the shape of a convergent research agenda. The major objective of contemporary ordoliberalism cannot be the development of policies for preconceived economic aims. Ordoliberals must instead think about how to organize and improve the caliber of public discussion on the goals themselves. In order to contribute to a more informed democratic discourse, modern ordoliberals should be scientifically oriented, open to normative arguments, and well-equipped with enough humility to admit their own ignorance. Only then can ordoliberalism become a persistent tradition. There should be more comparative studies that focus on German economic policies for this reason. To highlight the complex features of German economic institutions formed in ordoliberalism, it is crucial to compare them to their Anglo-American counterparts on the relevant themes. German studies must be based on ordoliberalism, and theoretical and applied discourses must coexist. Making the most of ordoliberal practicality will enable the development of the national economy as well as a sophisticated society.
참고문헌 (19)
- Amsden, A., "Korea’s Political Economy: An Institutional Perspective", pp.1~54 (1991), East West Center
- Bachmann, R., "Ordoliberalism and European economic policy: Between realpolitik and economic utopia", pp.108~122 (2019), Routledge
- 최시영, "German Ordoliberalism in Energy Policy: A Comparative Perspective", 질서경제저널, 21(4), pp.19~34 (2018), 한국질서경제학회[DOI]
- The ideological use and abuse of Freiburg’s ordoliberalism, "Dold, M.", CESifo, ~, pp.Working Paper, No. 8811-2020 (2019)
- Dold, M., "Ordoliberalism and European economic policy: Between realpolitik and economic utopia", pp.246~266 (2019), Routledge
- Dörr, J., "Ordoliberalism and European economic policy: Between realpolitik and economic utopia", pp.207~222 (2019), Routledge
- Dyson, K., "Ordoliberalism and European economic policy: Between realpolitik and economic utopia", pp.91~107 (2019), Routledge
- Feld, L. P., "Ordoliberalism and European economic policy: Between realpolitik and economic utopia", pp.237~245 (2019), Routledge
- 조희경, "German Ordoliberalism and the European Union's Competition Laws: The Google Cases", 질서경제저널, 22(4), pp.1~30 (2019), 한국질서경제학회
- 강경훈, "Some Evidences of Ordoliberalism in the EU’s Competition Policy", 질서경제저널, 23(1), pp.1~24 (2020), 한국질서경제학회[DOI]
- Kim, D. H., "Economics Principles for Public Officials" (1977), Bupjeon Publishing
- Kim, E. M., "Crisis of the developmental state in South Korea", Asian Perspective, Special Issue on the Dynamics of Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula, 23(2), pp.35~55 (1999)
- Kolev, S., "Ordoliberalism and European economic policy: Between realpolitik and economic utopia", pp.23~39 (2019), Routledge
- Feld, L. P., "Ordoliberalism and European economic policy: Between realpolitik and economic utopia", pp.237~245 (2019), Routledge
- Paik, H., "Misuses of Economic Terms in Korean Economic Principles Textbooks", Economic Studies, 49(1), pp.91~112 (2001)
- 백훈, "A Case Study of Economic Order in Korea: Any Evidence of Ordunungspolitik?", 질서경제저널, 21(4), pp.173~189 (2018), 한국질서경제학회[DOI]
- 백승헌, "Ordoliberalism in the German Financial System and the Financial Crisis: A Comparison to the U.S.", 질서경제저널, 24(2), pp.1~22 (2021), 한국질서경제학회[DOI]
- Wegner, G., "Ordoliberalism and European economic policy: Between realpolitik and economic utopia", pp.39~57, Routledge
- Young, B., "Ordoliberalism and European economic policy: Between realpolitik and economic utopia", pp.223~236 (2019), Routledge