과학 영재 관찰․추천 선발 방식에 대한 교사의 인식 조사 및 개선 방안
The Teachers' Recognition and a Plan for the Improvement of the System on Selection of Gifted Students in Science Using Teachers' Observation and Nomination
1
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to investigate teachers' recognition and to suggest an improvement in the systemof teacher’s observation and nomination used to selecting gifted and talented students in Science in the BusanMetropolitan School District in 2013 by investigating teachers' recognition of the system and their expressedneeds. The results are as follows. First, it was observed that teachers are of the opinion that it is difficult todetermine the science gifted students by observation due to their lack of expertise in giftedness and giftededucation, the lack of a check list to use, and the difficulty of ensuring the objectivity of the results of thedetermination. Second, the absence of objective screening tools used for the selection, the selection of giftedstudents based on their subjective judgment, and the possibility to select students based only on visible manifestationsof ability may cause parents to mistrust the system. Thus, institutional support is required to addressthe concerns of teachers and parents. Third, the teachers who are in charge of observation, nomination, selectionand determination need to be trained. After that, at least one of these teachers should be assigned in each schooland training should operate continuously and systematically. Lastly, while these things are occurring, the processof observation and nomination of by teachers, which is the basis of pooling gifted students at the level of BusanMetropolitan School District, should be continued.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate teachers' recognition and to suggest an improvement in the systemof teacher’s observation and nomination used to selecting gifted and talented students in Science in the BusanMetropolitan School District in 2013 by investigating teachers' recognition of the system and their expressedneeds. The results are as follows. First, it was observed that teachers are of the opinion that it is difficult todetermine the science gifted students by observation due to their lack of expertise in giftedness and giftededucation, the lack of a check list to use, and the difficulty of ensuring the objectivity of the results of thedetermination. Second, the absence of objective screening tools used for the selection, the selection of giftedstudents based on their subjective judgment, and the possibility to select students based only on visible manifestationsof ability may cause parents to mistrust the system. Thus, institutional support is required to addressthe concerns of teachers and parents. Third, the teachers who are in charge of observation, nomination, selectionand determination need to be trained. After that, at least one of these teachers should be assigned in each schooland training should operate continuously and systematically. Lastly, while these things are occurring, the processof observation and nomination of by teachers, which is the basis of pooling gifted students at the level of BusanMetropolitan School District, should be continued.
참고문헌 (15)
- 교육과학기술부, "2009년 영재교육 시행계획", ~ (2009)
- 김인숙, "교사 관찰·추천제를 활용한 영재교육 대상자 선발방식에 대한 강원지역 초등학교 교사의 인식과 태도", 석사, 교육행정전공, pp.2012
- 김정숙, "영재교육에 대한 교사와 부모의 인식 및 요구도 조사 연구 : 유치원과 초등학교를 중심으로", 석사, 유아교육, pp.2005
- 김종선, "영재교육에 대한 영재 부모들의 인식 및 요구조사", 석사, 영재교육, pp.2008
- 류지영, "관찰·추천을 통한 영재판별에 대한 영재담당교사들의 인식과 태도", 한국교원교육연구, 27(2), pp.159~178 (2010), 한국교원교육학회
- 류지영, "영재학급 대상자 선발을 위한 관찰․추천 영재판별모형 개발 연구", 영재교육연구, 20(1), pp.257~287 (2010), 한국영재학회
- 유미현, "과학영재교육원 관찰․추천 방식의 영재선발 분석", 과학영재교육, 3(2), pp.27~38 (2011)
- 윤진경, "교사와 학부모의 주관적 평정에 의한 영재학생 판별의 타당성 검토", 석사, 영재교육, pp.2010
- 이신동, "최신영재교육학개론" (2009), 학지사
- 전소영, "수학 및 과학 영재 선발을 위한 관찰·추천 제도에 대한 영재 학생과 학부모의 인식 조사 및 개선 방안 연구", 석사, 영재교육, pp.2011
- 최재혁, "초등학교 영재학급 및 지역 공동 영재학급의 운영에 관한 초등학교 교사들의 인식조사", 석사, 초등특수교육, pp.2006
- 최호성, "영재성 판별도구의 개발과 적용" (2010), 부산광역시 영재교육진흥원
- Neber, H., "Teacher identification of students for gifted" (2004), Nominations
- Renzulli, J. S., "The legacy logic of research on the identification of gifted persons", Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, pp.20~23 (1986)
- Siegle, D., "Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs", Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, pp.21~29 (2004)
