초등 과학영재와 발명영재의 사고양식 비교
Comparison of Thinking Styles between Gifted Elementary Students in Science and Invention
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to compare thinking styles between the gifted students in science and invention The subjects were 191 gifted elementary students in science and 182 gifted elementary students in invention, who enrolled in gifted education program. They were given the Thinking Style Inventory (TSI) that standardized Korea version by Yun(1997), which constructed 13 thinking styles of 5 dimensions(functions, forms, levels, scopes, and leanings of the mental self-government). The collected data were analyzed by independent sampling t-test and ANOVA with SPSS. The findings of this study were as follows: the gifted in science prefer executive, oligarchic, and global thinking styles rather than the gifted in invention. Meanwhile, the gifted in invention prefer legislative, judicial, local, and liberal thinking styles rather than the gifted in science. Both of the gifted in science and invention prefer legislative, executive, monarchic, anarchic, external, and liberal thinking styles. There was statistically significant differences between boys and girls in executive, oligarchic, local, and liberal thinking styles of the gifted in science.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare thinking styles between the gifted students in science and invention The subjects were 191 gifted elementary students in science and 182 gifted elementary students in invention, who enrolled in gifted education program. They were given the Thinking Style Inventory (TSI) that standardized Korea version by Yun(1997), which constructed 13 thinking styles of 5 dimensions(functions, forms, levels, scopes, and leanings of the mental self-government). The collected data were analyzed by independent sampling t-test and ANOVA with SPSS. The findings of this study were as follows: the gifted in science prefer executive, oligarchic, and global thinking styles rather than the gifted in invention. Meanwhile, the gifted in invention prefer legislative, judicial, local, and liberal thinking styles rather than the gifted in science. Both of the gifted in science and invention prefer legislative, executive, monarchic, anarchic, external, and liberal thinking styles. There was statistically significant differences between boys and girls in executive, oligarchic, local, and liberal thinking styles of the gifted in science.
참고문헌 (29)
- Dai, D. Y., "A validation study of the thinking styles inventory : implication for gifted education", Roeper Reviews, 21(4), pp.302~307 (1999)
- Francisco, C-G., "Learning and thinking styles : An analysis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement", Educational Psychology, 20(4), pp.413~430 (2000)
- Grigorenko, E. L, "Styles of thinking, abilities, and academic performance", Exceptional Children, 63(3), pp.295~312 (1997)
- 한기순, "과학영재와 일반학생들 간의 사고 양식과 지능 및 창의성간의 관계 비교", 교육심리연구, 18(2), pp.49~68 (2004), 한국교육심리학회
- 한기순, "초등학교 영재아동의 사고양식과 학습양식 간의 관계탐색", 영재교육연구, 20(1), pp.289~316 (2010), 한국영재학회
- 김학준, "영재교육기관별 초등과학영재와 일반학생의 과흥분성과 사회적 자아개념 비교", 과학교육연구지, 38(2), pp.401~414 (2014), 과학교육연구소
- 이재호, "3대 핵심역량을 중심으로 한 미래지향적 발명영재상 정립에 대한 연구", 영재교육연구, 23(3), pp.435~452 (2013), 한국영재학회
- 이재호, "발명영재상 수립을 위한 발명영재의 특성 이해", 영재교육연구, 22(3), pp.551~573 (2012), 한국영재학회
- 이지애, "과학영재들의 사고양식과 자기조절학습능력 및 과학탐구능력간의 관계 분석", 영재교육연구, 21(3), pp.773~796 (2011), 한국영재학회
- 이신동, "초등학교 수학영재, 과학영재, 일반 학생의 학습유형 및 교수방법 선호도 비교", 영재와 영재교육, 6(2), pp.107~128 (2007), 한국영재교육학회
- Lee, S. E., "The relations between thinking style and learning style and science achievement of the middle school students", 석사, pp.2009
- Ministry of Education, "The third master plan for Korean Gifted Education (2013-2017)" (2013), Ministry of Education
- 나동진, "과학영재의 사고양식과 학업성취의 관계", 열린교육연구, 11(1), pp.275~291 (2003), 한국열린교육학회
- 박수경, "과학영재학생과 일반학생의 사고양식에 따른 지구과학 개념 비교", 한국지구과학회지, 25(8), pp.708~718 (2004), 한국지구과학회
- Roe, A., "A psychological study of physical scientists", Genetic Psychology Monographs, 43(2), pp.121~235 (1951)
- Seoul, "Curriculum of gifted education", Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education, 2009, Seoul Education 2009-14
- Sternberg, R. J., "MSG thinking styles inventory" (1991), Yale University
- Sternberg, R. J., "Thinking styles : Keys to understanding student performance", Phi Delta Kappan, 71, pp.366~371 (1990)
- Sternberg, R. J., "Thinking styles" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- 황희숙, "영역별 영재와 일반아동의 사고양식과 학습양식과의 관계", 열린교육연구, 14(1), pp.261~288 (2006), 한국열린교육학회
- 황희숙, "과학영재와 일반학생의 비판적 사고와 사고양식과의 관계 비교", 열린교육연구, 14(3), pp.149~172 (2006), 한국열린교육학회
- 윤미선, "사고양식, 성취목표지향성, 성취도, 연령, 성별 특성이 교과흥미에 미치는 영향- 중고생의 과학교과를 대상으로 -", 교육심리연구, 21(3), pp.557~572 (2007), 한국교육심리학회
- Yu, J-H., "The relationship of thinking style and critical thinking disposition of secondary school students", 석사, pp.2010
- Yune, S-J., "Differences in thinking styles of students between gifted and average students and thinking styles of teachers by characteristics", Journal of Gifted, 2003, pp.13(3), 19~44
- Zhang, L. F., "Are thinking styles and personality types related?", Educational Psychology, 20(3), pp.271~283 (2000)
- Zhang, L. F., "Do styles of thinking matter among Hong Kong secondary school student?", Personality and Individual Differences, 31(3), pp.289~301 (2001)
- Zhang, L. F., "Thinking styles and modes of thinking : implications for education and research", The Journal of Psychology, 136(3), pp.245~261 (2002)
- Zhang, L. F., "Contributions of thinking styles to critical thinking dispositions", The Journal of Psychology, 137(6), pp.517~545 (2003)
- Zhang, L. F, "Are learning approaches and thinking styles related?", The Journal of Psychology, 134(5), pp.469~489 (2000)