초등학교 과학 교과서의 거꾸로 수업 활용 가능성에 대한 교사들의 인식 - 한국과 싱가포르 교과서 비교 연구 -
Elementary Teachers’ Conceptions about Applicability of Science Textbooks for Flipped Learning - Comparative Study of Korean and Singaporean Textbooks -
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is to examine whether elementary science textbooks in Korea and Singapore are applicable to flipped learning. By comparative study we sought to identifying appropriate features of science textbooks for learner-centered teaching. We analyzed text pages on the unit of ‘Working of electricity’ in Korean elementary science textbook for sixth grade and three chapters of ‘Electric circuits, Using electricity, Conductors of electricity’ in Singaporean elementary textbook, ‘Science : My pals are here!’. We designed evaluating frameworks for science textbooks based on the four pillars of flipped learning. and applied it to 10 elementary teachers evaluate two textbooks. They evaluated textbooks with Likert Scale items and wrote detailed statements and exemplars about their choices. We analyzed the teachers’ evaluative descriptions inductively and chose commonly mentioned characteristics. Based on the analysis, we got to the conclusion about specific features of two elementary science textbooks in terms of flexible environment, learning culture, intentional contents, and teachers’ expertises. Implications for improving science textbooks towards flipped learning and learner-centered teaching through comparative study were discussed.
Abstract
This study is to examine whether elementary science textbooks in Korea and Singapore are applicable to flipped learning. By comparative study we sought to identifying appropriate features of science textbooks for learner-centered teaching. We analyzed text pages on the unit of ‘Working of electricity’ in Korean elementary science textbook for sixth grade and three chapters of ‘Electric circuits, Using electricity, Conductors of electricity’ in Singaporean elementary textbook, ‘Science : My pals are here!’. We designed evaluating frameworks for science textbooks based on the four pillars of flipped learning. and applied it to 10 elementary teachers evaluate two textbooks. They evaluated textbooks with Likert Scale items and wrote detailed statements and exemplars about their choices. We analyzed the teachers’ evaluative descriptions inductively and chose commonly mentioned characteristics. Based on the analysis, we got to the conclusion about specific features of two elementary science textbooks in terms of flexible environment, learning culture, intentional contents, and teachers’ expertises. Implications for improving science textbooks towards flipped learning and learner-centered teaching through comparative study were discussed.
참고문헌 (33)
- Bergmann, J., "Flip your classroom:Research every student in every class every day" (2012), International Society for Technology in Education
- Binkley, M., "Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills", pp.17~66 (2012), Springer
- Boyd, S., "Shifting the frame: Exploring integration of the Key Competencies at six normal schools" (2006), New Zealand Council for Education Research
- 최윤미, "2007년 개정교육과정에 따른 초등 과학교과서에 제시된 발문의 유형 분석", 과학교육연구지, 36(1), pp.120~129 (2012), 과학교육연구소
- "The four pillars of FLIPTM" (2014)[URL]
- Gordon, J., "Key competences in Europe: Opening doors for lifelong learners across the school curriculum and teacher education" (2009), CASE
- "The flipped learning model: A white paper based on the literature review titled a review of flipped learning" (2013)[URL]
- Hann, A., "The effect of science reading program on science learning in elementary school", 과학교육논총, 13, pp.159~178 (2001)
- 장경원, "학습자 중심 교육에 대한 교육행정가, 교사, 예비교사의 인식 비교 연구", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 9(1), pp.315~339 (2009), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- Jarvis, W., "A Large Class Engagement (LCE) model based on Service-Dominant Logic (SDL) and flipped classrooms", Education Research and Perspectives, 41, pp.1~24 (2014)
- 정진아, "거꾸로 교실을 적용한 과학수업이 초등학생의 과학 학습 동기 및 학업성취도에 미치는 영향", 생물교육, 43(4), pp.333~343 (2015), 한국생물교육학회
- 정하나, "우리나라와 싱가포르의 초등학교 과학 교과서에 제시된 물리 영역 탐구 활동의 특징 비교", 과학교육연구지, 36(1), pp.139~152 (2012), 과학교육연구소
- 강석진, "초등학교 과학 교과서의 읽기자료에 대한 교사와 학생의 인식", 초등과학교육, 32(3), pp.315~326 (2013), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 김대현, "한국의 수업과 평가에서의 교과서 활용과 전망", 교육혁신연구, 25(3), pp.21~44 (2015), 교육발전연구소
- Seoul: A study on the development of school textbook model, "Kim, J.", Korea Institute for Curriculum and Education, ~, pp.RRC 98-8 (1998)
- Kim, K., "Primary teachers’ views about the workbook Experiment & observation and its practical usage", master, pp.2002
- 최상호, "모바일 장치를 활용한 거꾸로 수업의 적용가능성 탐색", 중등교육연구, 64(2), pp.451~480 (2016), 사범대학부속중등교육연구소
- 권치순, "과학수업에서 실험관찰 교과서에 대한 교사들의 인식과 활용 방안", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 4(1), pp.12~19 (2011), 대한지구과학교육학회
- Lage, M., "Inverting the classroom : A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment", The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), pp.30~43 (2000)
- Improvement plan of the subject curriculum based on the key competencies-focusing on the alignment of curriculum, teaching․learning methods and educational assessment, "Lee, K.", Korea Institute for Curriculum and Education, ~, pp.RRC 2013-2 (2013)
- 이종옥, "역량기반 교육모델 관점의 플립수업 성과에 관한 연구", 중등교육연구, 63(4), pp.505~538 (2015), 사범대학부속중등교육연구소
- Luke, A., "A model for researchbased state professional development policy", Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), pp.1~21 (2009)
- "News & Events" (2011)[URL]
- 나지연, "과학수업에서 학생의 일상경험 도입에 대한 초등교사의 인식과 실행 및 배경요인", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(7), pp.635~645 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- "The definition and selection of key competencies:Executive summary" (2005)[URL]
- 박주현, "제7차 초등학교 과학 교과서 물질 영역에 제시된 발문 분석", 초등과학교육, 26(5), pp.551~557 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Ryu, S., "Debates on the definition of learning-oriented flipped learning for class innovation", The Journal of Education Assignment Institute, 20(1), pp.67~80 (2014)
- 신영준, "거꾸로 수업을 지원할 수 있는 과학교과서 모형 개발 연구", 과학교육연구지, 40(1), pp.90~102 (2016), 과학교육연구소
- 신영준, "거꾸로 수업(Flipped Learning)에서 과학 교사들이 겪는 인식과 어려움 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 36(1), pp.159~166 (2016), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 신영준, "거꾸로 수업(Flipped Learning)을 적용한 초등학교 과학과 생명 영역 수업의 효과 탐색", 생물교육, 44(1), pp.60~71 (2016), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- "The 9% challenge: Education in school and society" (2001)[URL]
- Stern, L., "Can middle school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061’s curriculum evaluation study : Life science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), pp.538~568 (2004)
- Strauss, A. L., "Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory" (1998), Sage Publications