본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등학교 과학교과서에 제시된 탐구활동의 교수전략, 유형, 개념과의 연관성 분석- 지구과학 영역을 중심으로 -

Analysis of Teaching Strategies, Types of Inquiry Activities and the Relationship between Inquiry Activities and Concepts Presented in Elementary School Science Textbooks- Focusing on Earth Science -

임성만
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)|2020.08|초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)|제39권 제3호|pp. 449-463|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.3.449

0

조회

0

다운로드

18

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

inquiry activityearth scienceteaching strategyelementary school science textbooktype of inquiry activitiesscience concepts
주제분류교육학

초록

This study was to analysis teaching strategies, types of inquiry activities and the relationship between science concepts and inquiry activities presented in science textbooks. As a result of the study, first, the inquiry-based teaching strategies presented in science textbooks were experiment, simulation, demonstration, and field study. Second, there were 53 inquiry activities presented in 8 units related to the earth science area of ​​science textbooks, and the types of inquiry activities were experimental observation (EO) 18, mock activity (SA) 20, investigation discussion and presentation (IP). It was analyzed as 12, data interpretation (ID) 2, and express (EX) 1 piece. Third, the relationship between inquiry activities and science concepts presented in science textbooks was analyzed. As a result of the analysis, out of a total of 42 inquiry activities, 21 inquiry activities corresponded to EA (explicit activities), in which the result of inquiry activities was directly and explicitly linked to science concepts. And IA (implicit activities), which is an implicit inquiry activity in which science concepts must be inferred using the results of inquiry activities, were analyzed as 21. In particular, IA (implicit activities), which is an implicit inquiry activity, can be said to be the result of reflecting the characteristics of earth science areas where many simulated activities (SA) are used. This is considered to be a matter to be considered in the process of developing various elementary science textbooks in the future.

Abstract

This study was to analysis teaching strategies, types of inquiry activities and the relationship between science concepts and inquiry activities presented in science textbooks. As a result of the study, first, the inquiry-based teaching strategies presented in science textbooks were experiment, simulation, demonstration, and field study. Second, there were 53 inquiry activities presented in 8 units related to the earth science area of ​​science textbooks, and the types of inquiry activities were experimental observation (EO) 18, mock activity (SA) 20, investigation discussion and presentation (IP). It was analyzed as 12, data interpretation (ID) 2, and express (EX) 1 piece. Third, the relationship between inquiry activities and science concepts presented in science textbooks was analyzed. As a result of the analysis, out of a total of 42 inquiry activities, 21 inquiry activities corresponded to EA (explicit activities), in which the result of inquiry activities was directly and explicitly linked to science concepts. And IA (implicit activities), which is an implicit inquiry activity in which science concepts must be inferred using the results of inquiry activities, were analyzed as 21. In particular, IA (implicit activities), which is an implicit inquiry activity, can be said to be the result of reflecting the characteristics of earth science areas where many simulated activities (SA) are used. This is considered to be a matter to be considered in the process of developing various elementary science textbooks in the future.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. 교육부, "과학과 교육과정", 교육부 고시 제205-74호, ~ (2015)
  2. 교육부, "초등학교 3, 4, 5, 6학년 과학교과서" (2018), (주)비상
  3. 노태희, "비유를 사용한 화학 개념 학습에서 유발되는 대응 오류와 개념 이해도의 관계", 대한화학회지, 50(6), pp.486~493 (2006), 대한화학회
  4. 김범기, "천문 개념 취도와 공간 능력과의 상관관계에 관한 연구", 한국초등과학교육학회지, 24(2), pp.216~225 (1996)
  5. 김순식, "‘계절 변화’에 대한 탐구적 과학글쓰기 수업이 초등학생들의 과학 학습동기 및 과학적 태도에 미치는 영향", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 10(3), pp.278~289 (2017), 대한지구과학교육학회[DOI]
  6. 명전옥, "예비교사들의 지구과학 문제 해결 실패요인 : 달과 행성의 운동을 중심으로", 한국지구과학회지, 22(5), pp.339~349 (2001)
  7. 박종윤, "상호작용을 강화한 형성평가 수업전략이 중학교 과학학습에 미치는 영향", 한국과학교육학회지, 20(3), pp.468~478 (2000)
  8. 서동욱, "야외 지질 학습장의 퇴적암과 지질 구조에 관한 초등학생들의 관찰 및 가설 분석", 한국지구과학회지, 25(7), pp.586~594 (2004), 한국지구과학회
  9. 송신철, "고등학교 통합과학 교과서에 나타난 탐구활동 유형 분석", 생물교육, 46(1), pp.24~38 (2018), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  10. 이창진, "고등학교 학생을 위한 가상지질조사 웹 컨텐츠 개발 - 제주도 송악산과 지삿개를 중심으로 -", 한국지구과학회지, 24(3), pp.172~180 (2003), 한국지구과학회
  11. 임성만, "우리나라 역대 초등학교 교과서에서 다루어진 ‘지구과학’ 영역의 중심개념과 탐구활동 분석 및 차기 교과서 개선 방안 모색", 초등과학교육, 34(3), pp.288~296 (2015), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  12. 임성만, "우리나라와 싱가포르 초등과학교과서에 제시된 개념 및 탐구활동 요소 비교 분석: 지질 관련 내용을 중심으로", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 11(1), pp.38~54 (2018), 대한지구과학교육학회[DOI]
  13. 임성만, "초등과학 교과서 지질 분야의 지역화 자료 개발의 필요성과 방향 : ‘지층과 화석’ 단원을 중심으로", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 12(3), pp.184~197 (2019), 대한지구과학교육학회
  14. 임청환, "국민학교 자연과 천문분야 내용분석과 문제점", 한국과학교육학회지, 13(2), pp.247~256 (1993)
  15. 정수연, "2009 개정과 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 생명과학 Ⅱ 교과서의 탐구활동 유형 분석", 현장과학교육, 14(2), pp.160~174 (2020), 한국현장과학교육학회[DOI]
  16. 한영욱, "초등학교 암석원의 실태분서 및암석단원 지도를 위한 효과적인 방안 모색", 부산교육대학교 논문집, 7(1), pp.59~78 (2005)
  17. 허숙, "국가교육과정 정책의 방향과 과제", 교육과정연구, 27(3), pp.1~13 (2009)
  18. (2003)[URL]
  19. Anderson, R. D., "Reforming science teaching : What research says about inquiry", Journal of Science Techer Education, 13(1), pp.1~12 (2002)
  20. Ball, D. L., "Using textbooks and teacher’s guides : A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators", Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), pp.401~423 (1988)
  21. Bell, R. L., "Simplifying inquiry instruction", The Science Teacher, 72(7), pp.30~33 (2005)
  22. Çaliskan, O., "Virtual field trips in education of earth and environment sciences", Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, pp.3239~3243 (2011)
  23. Chiappetta, E., "Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science", International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), pp.1847~1868 (2007)
  24. Chinn C. A., "Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools : A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks", Science Education, 86(2), pp.175~218 (2002)
  25. Colaizzi, P. E., "Psychological research as the phenomenologist view it existential phenomenology" (1978), Oxford University press
  26. Constantinou, C. P., "Professional development for inquiry-based science teaching and learning", pp.1~23 (2018)
  27. DiGiuseppe, M., "Representing nature of science in a science textbook : Exploring author-editor–publisher interactions", International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), pp.1061~1082 (2014)
  28. Duschl, R., "Subject-specific instructional methods and activities", pp.269~290 (2001), Emerald Group Publishing Limited
  29. Hofstein A., "The laboratory in science education : Foundation for the 21st century", Science Education, 88(1), pp.28~54 (2004)
  30. Huberman, A. M., "Qualitative data analysis" (1994), Sage Publications
  31. Hubisz, J., "Middle-school texts don’t make the grade", Physics Today, 56(5), pp.50~54 (2003)
  32. Kesidou, S., "How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061s curriculum review", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), pp.522~549 (2002)
  33. Kusnick, J., "Growing pebbles and conceptual prisms—Understanding the sources of student misconceptions about rock formation", Journal of Geoscience Education, 50(1), pp.31~39 (2002)
  34. Leite, L., "Heat and temperature : An analysis of how these concepts are dealt with in textbooks", European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), pp.75~88 (1999)
  35. Linn, M. C., "Internet environments for science education", pp.47~72 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  36. The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction, "Marzano, R.", The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, ~ (2007)
  37. Mullis, I. V., "TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics", International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (2012)
  38. Orgill, M. K., "Locks and keys:How analogies are used and perceived in biochemistry classes", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the NARST (2004)
  39. Ramasundaram, V., "Development of an environmental virtual laboratory", Computer and Education, 45(1), pp.21~34 (2005)
  40. Rillero, P., "The rise and fall of science education : A content analysis of Science in elementary reading textbooks of the 19th century", School Science and Mathematics Journal, 110(5), pp.277~286 (2010)
  41. Rivard, L. P., "A review of writing to learning science : Implication for practice and research", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), pp.969~983 (1994)
  42. Roseman, J. E., "Putting textbooks to the test", ENC Focus, 8(3), pp.56~59 (2001)
  43. Sadler, T. D., "Learning Science through Research Apprenticeships : A Critical Reviewof the Literature", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), pp.235~256 (2010)
  44. Schwartz, R. S., "Developing views of nature of science in an authenticcontext : An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry", Science Education, 88(4), pp.610~645 (2004)
  45. Schwarz, C. V., "Helping elementary preservice teachers learn to use curriculum materials foreffective science teaching", Science Education, 92(2), pp.345~377 (2008)
  46. Shamsudin, N. M., "Strategies of teaching science using an inquiry based science education(IBSE)by novice chemistry teachers", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, pp.583~592 (2013)
  47. Stern, L., "Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from project 2061s curriculum evaluation study : Life science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), pp.538~568 (2004)
  48. Stoffels, N. T., "“There is a worksheet to be followed”: A case study of a science teacher’s use of learning support texts for practical work", African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), pp.147~157 (2005)
  49. Suarez, M. L., "The relationship between inquirybased science instruction and student achievement", Doctor, pp.2011
  50. Thomas, W. J., "A review of research on project based learning" (2000), Autodes Foundation
  51. Wickman, P. O., "The practical epistemologies of the classroom : A study of laboratory work", Science Education, 88(3), pp.325~344 (2004)
  52. Wier, B., "“Living inside the earth”, Children’s preconceptions about how we addressed them", Paper Presented at the National Conference of the National Science Teachers Association (2000)
  53. Technology, "Science", pp.State University of New York Press, Society as reform in science education

관련 논문AI추천

2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 과학 교과의 탐구활동 유형 분석- 3~4학년군 과학 교과서를 중심으로 -송신철한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2019 · 제47권 제3호초등 5~6학년군 과학 교과서에 제시된 탐구 활동 유형 분석송신철, 심규철한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2019 · 제38권 제4호고등학교 통합과학 교과서에 나타난 탐구활동 유형 분석송신철, 심규철한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2018 · 제46권 제1호우리나라 역대 초등학교 교과서에서 다루어진 ‘지구과학’ 영역의 중심개념과 탐구활동 분석 및 차기 교과서 개선 방안 모색임성만한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2015 · 제34권 제3호고등학교 과학탐구실험 교과서에 제시된 탐구 활동 분석송신철, 심규철한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2019 · 제47권 제3호초등학교 과학 교과서의 탐구활동에 나타난 과학 탐구 기능 요소 분석- 5~6학년군 과학 교과서를 중심으로 -송신철, 심규철한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2020 · 제48권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

어플리케이션 기반 생물 관찰 기록 학습이 초등학생들의 과학 관련 태도에 미치는 영향박형민pp. 307-322초등학생 소집단 활동에서 성별 구성에 따른 언어적 상호작용 유형과 안정성 분석양가인, 김영신, 임수민pp. 323-337PCK에 근거한 초등학교 교사의 과학영재수업과 발명영재수업 구성과 실천의 특징 비교차유미, 강훈식pp. 338-352초등학교 과학 수업에서 과학영재 학생의 행동 특성이 일반 학생에게 미치는 영향에 대한 교사의 인식윤서정, 강훈식pp. 353-368초등과학영재학생의 과학창의성과 다중지능의 관계 - 생명 영역을 중심으로 -임채성, 김민주pp. 369-381
원문 보기