본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

증강현실을 활용한 국내․외 과학교육 연구 동향 분석- 초등과학교육 연구를 위한 시사점을 중심으로 -

Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Science Education Research Trends using Augmented Reality- Focusing on Implications for Research in Elementary Science Education -

윤회정|나지연
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)|2021.02|초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)|제40권 제1호|pp. 22-35

2

조회

0

다운로드

18

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

research trendaugmented realityelementary science education
주제분류교육학

초록

In order to investigate the trends in science education research using AR (Augmented Reality) and derive implications for elementary science education, we analyzed 71 research articles on AR application in science education published in both Korea and abroad from 2010 to August 2020. In quantitative aspects, the number of published articles has steadily increased. For domestic researches, the number of papers targeting for elementary school students was higher than that of middle & high school students. In the research method aspects, qualitative methods were most frequently used. In particular, papers regarding the development of AR program and verification of its effectiveness were most frequently published. The researches using mixed method in domestic field were smaller in number than that of the research in abroad. There were similar trends in research targeting elementary school students. In the aspects of the contents, more researches were performed on biology and earth science areas than others. In case of researches for elementary school students, the proportion of researches on biology and earth science was even higher. Domestically the proportion of studies on the convergence of science and non-science subjects was higher than that of foreign studies. The number of researches exploring the effectiveness on ‘non-scientific attitude domain’, ‘cognitive domain’, and ‘program domain’ were relatively higher than that on ‘inquiry & practice domain’ and ‘science-related attitude domain’. For types of AR contents, ‘observation manipulation type’ was mostly studied, followed by ‘experimental activity type’, and ‘learning guide type’. In case of studies on elementary school students, the ratio of ‘observation manipulation type’ contents was higher than that of others, whereas studies on ‘field problem solving type’ were relatively less reported than others. In addition, studies on ‘simple interaction’ were most frequently reported. Particularly, there were relatively few studies on ‘linear and nonlinear interactions’ in domestic field. As a result of analyzing key words, we found that the key words related to the characteristics and implementation of AR frequently occurred, and the key words related to elementary education and the merits of AR had many direct connections with other key words.

Abstract

In order to investigate the trends in science education research using AR (Augmented Reality) and derive implications for elementary science education, we analyzed 71 research articles on AR application in science education published in both Korea and abroad from 2010 to August 2020. In quantitative aspects, the number of published articles has steadily increased. For domestic researches, the number of papers targeting for elementary school students was higher than that of middle & high school students. In the research method aspects, qualitative methods were most frequently used. In particular, papers regarding the development of AR program and verification of its effectiveness were most frequently published. The researches using mixed method in domestic field were smaller in number than that of the research in abroad. There were similar trends in research targeting elementary school students. In the aspects of the contents, more researches were performed on biology and earth science areas than others. In case of researches for elementary school students, the proportion of researches on biology and earth science was even higher. Domestically the proportion of studies on the convergence of science and non-science subjects was higher than that of foreign studies. The number of researches exploring the effectiveness on ‘non-scientific attitude domain’, ‘cognitive domain’, and ‘program domain’ were relatively higher than that on ‘inquiry & practice domain’ and ‘science-related attitude domain’. For types of AR contents, ‘observation manipulation type’ was mostly studied, followed by ‘experimental activity type’, and ‘learning guide type’. In case of studies on elementary school students, the ratio of ‘observation manipulation type’ contents was higher than that of others, whereas studies on ‘field problem solving type’ were relatively less reported than others. In addition, studies on ‘simple interaction’ were most frequently reported. Particularly, there were relatively few studies on ‘linear and nonlinear interactions’ in domestic field. As a result of analyzing key words, we found that the key words related to the characteristics and implementation of AR frequently occurred, and the key words related to elementary education and the merits of AR had many direct connections with other key words.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. 안희숙, "상호작용 유형에 따른 증강현실 에듀테인먼트 콘텐츠의 교육적 특성 분석", 애니메이션연구, 10(4), pp.152~169 (2014), 한국애니메이션학회
  2. Altinpulluk, H., "Determining the trends of using augmented reality in education between 2006-2016", Education and Information Technologies, 24, pp.1089~1114 (2019)
  3. 안경민, "가상ㆍ증강현실 에듀테크 콘텐츠 개발의 우선순위 도출 : AHP 기법 활용", e-비즈니스연구, 20(7), pp.233~260 (2019), 국제e-비즈니스학회[DOI]
  4. Akçayır, M., "Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education:A systematic review of the literature", Educational Research Review, 20, pp.1~11 (2017)
  5. Arici, F., "Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis", Computers & Education, 142, pp.1~23 (2019)
  6. Azuma, R. T., "A survey of augmented reality", Presence : Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), pp.355~385 (1997)
  7. Bacca, J., "Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications", Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), pp.133~149 (2014)
  8. Bressler, D. M., "A mixed methods assessment of students’ flow experiences during a mobile reality science game", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), pp.505~517 (2013)
  9. Carmigniani, J., "Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications", Multimedia Tools and Applications, 51(1), pp.341~377 (2011)
  10. Chen, Y. -C., "Use of tangible and augmented reality models in engineering graphics courses", Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 137(4), pp.267~276 (2011)
  11. Chang, R. -C., "Developing an interactive augmented reality system as a complement to plant education and comparing its effectiveness with video learning", Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), pp.1245~1264 (2016)
  12. Chiang, T. H. C., "Students’ online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities", Computers & Education, 78, pp.97~108 (2014)
  13. 정부자, "초등학생의 어휘지식 수준에 따른 파생어 형태인식 발달 연구", 언어치료연구, 29(3), pp.81~89 (2020), 한국언어치료학회[DOI]
  14. Collela, V., "Participatory simulations : Building collaborative understanding through immersive dynamic modeling", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), pp.471~500 (2000)
  15. Estudante, A., "Using augmented reality to stimulate students and diffuse escape game activities to larger audiences", Journal of Chemical Education, 97(5), pp.1368~1374 (2020)
  16. Goktas, Y., "Educational technology research trends in Turkey : A content analysis of the 2000-2009 decade", Educational Sciences : Theory and Practice, 12(1), pp.177~199 (2012)
  17. Ibáñez, M-B., "Augmented reality for STEM learning : A systematic review", Computer & Education, 123, pp.109~123 (2018)
  18. Jang, S. -H., "Educational application of augmented reality contents", Journal of Korea Contents Association, 5(2), pp.79~85 (2007)
  19. Johnson, L., "The 2011 horizon report" (2011), The New Media Consortium
  20. 김혜나, "증강현실기반 교육 연구 동향: 국내 연구에 대한 체계적 문헌고찰을 통하여", 정보교육학회논문지, 22(3), pp.397~407 (2018), 한국정보교육학회[DOI]
  21. 김정수, "증강현실 기반 과학과 STEAM 프로그램 활용 수업의 효과성 분석", 지적장애연구, 20(3), pp.151~175 (2018), 한국지적장애교육학회[DOI]
  22. Kyza, E. A., "Scaffolding augmented reality inquiry learning: The design and investigation of the TraceReaders location-based, augmented reality platform", Interactive Learning Environments, 27(2), pp.211~225 (2019)
  23. Laine, T. H., "Mobile educational augmented reality games: A systematic literature review and two case studies", Computers, 7(1), pp.19~47 (2018)
  24. 이창윤, "중등 과학교육에서 증강현실의 활용 및 발전방안 탐색", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 19(2), pp.265~292 (2019), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  25. 이효녕, "과학 교과와 연계된 통합 교육의 국내 연구 동향 분석", 교과교육학연구, 18(2), pp.295~319 (2014), 교과교육연구소[DOI]
  26. 이태수, "증강현실 기반 중재와 개념적 의미지도가 정신지체 학생의 과학과 학습과 흥미도에 미치는 효과", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 15(4), pp.421~441 (2015), 학습자중심교과교육학회
  27. 임철일, "미래 사회와 교육을 위한 교육공학 연구 및 실천 영역의 재조명", 교육공학연구, 35(2), pp.253~287 (2019), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
  28. Liu, P. -H. E., "Using augmentedreality-based mobile learning material in EFL English composition: An exploratory case study", British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), pp.E1~E4 (2013)
  29. Martín-Gutiérrez, J., "Virtual technologies trends in Education", EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(2), pp.469~486 (2017)
  30. "교원양성대학 원격교육 역량강화사업 시행계획" (2020)[URL]
  31. Nielsen, B. L., "Augmented reality in science education: Affordances for student learning", Nordic Studies in Science Education, 12(2), pp.157~174 (2016)
  32. OECD, "The definition and selection of key competencies:Executive summary" (2005), OECD Publishing
  34. Pathomaree, N, "Augmented reality for skill transfer in assembly task", IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication, pp.500~504 (2005)
  35. Analysis of major theme in fourth industrial revolution- focusing on related industries, "Park, S. B", Statistics Research Institute, ~ (2017)
  36. 박새록, "국내 증강현실 활용 교육 연구 동향: 2015년부터 2019년을 중심으로", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 20(11), pp.1~23 (2020), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  37. 박현린, "가상현실 및 증강현실 기술을 기반으로 한 매체의 교육적 효과에 대한 국내 동향 연구", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 20(5), pp.725~741 (2020), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  38. Radu, I., "Augmented reality in education: A metareview and cross-media analysis", Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), pp.1533~1543 (2014)
  39. The next generation of learning model for augmented reality enhanced in tangible interface, "Ryu, J. H.", Korea Education and Research Information Service, ~, pp.CR 2006-18 (2006)
  40. Schwab, K., "The fourth industrial revolution" (2016), Crown Publishing
  41. Shelton, B. E., "How augmented reality helps students learn dynamic spatial relationships", Doctor, pp.2003
  42. Sortiriou, S., "Visualizing the invisible: Augmented reality as an innovative science education scheme", Advanced Science Letters, 1(1), pp.114~129 (2008)
  43. Squire, K., "Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), pp.371~413 (2007)
  44. "Information and communication dictionary" (2020)[URL]
  45. "Deep shift: Technology tipping points and societal impact" (2015)[URL]
  46. Wu, H. -K., "Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education", Computers & Education, 62, pp.41~49 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

AR 및 VR 관련 과학교육 문헌 연구박정우, 변태진한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2023 · 제42권 제2호국내 증강현실(AR) 기반 교육 연구동향 분석: 2008년~2019년을 중심으로임철일, 한송이한국교육공학회 · 교육공학연구2020 · 제36권 제3호증강현실기반 교육 연구 동향: 국내 연구에 대한 체계적 문헌고찰을 통하여김혜나한국정보교육학회 · 정보교육학회논문지2018 · 제22권 제3호초등학교 과학 디지털교과서에 제시된 테크놀로지를 활용한 탐구 활동의 특징 - 가상실험, 가상현실, 증강현실 활용 사례들을 중심으로 -박준형, 송진웅, 장진아한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2019 · 제38권 제2호증강현실 기반의 안내된 과학탐구 프로그램 개발에서 초등 예비교사들은 무엇에 중점을 두고, 어떤 어려움을 겪는가?나지연, 장진아한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2022 · 제41권 제4호증강현실과 가상현실을 활용한 과학 수업이 초등학생의 과학학습동기와 학업성취도에 미치는 영향소금현, 정민형한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2021 · 제49권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

행성의 공전 운동에 대한 초등 예비교사의 이해와 설명 모델맹승호pp. 1-12e학습터 플랫폼을 활용한 원격 생물 학습이 초등학생들의 과학 관련 태도에 미치는 영향박형민, 임채성pp. 13-21초등 예비교사의 대체에너지에 대한 이해도와 대안개념 분석나지연, 윤회정pp. 36-54학교내 무한상상실을 활용한 메이커교육 프로그램 적용이 초등학생의 창의적 문제해결력과 자기주도적 학습력에 미치는 효과이형철, 손경옥pp. 55-65온라인 학습에서 머신러닝을 활용한 초등 4학년 식물 분류 학습의 적용 사례 연구신동훈, 신원섭pp. 66-80
원문 보기