양초 연소 탐구 과제 상황에서 초등 예비교사가 생성한 관찰 및 가설의 오류 특성- 학습자의 선행 지식의 활용을 중심으로 -
The Features of the Observation and the Hypothetical Faults Generated by Pre-service Elementary Teachers on Candlelight Inquiry Tasks - Focusing on Usage of the Participants' Prior Knowledge -
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between pre-service elementary teacher's prior knowledge and processes of observations and hypotheses generation via analysis of descriptive fault patterns during observation, problem generation and hypotheses generation processes. For the purpose of this study, thirty-four undergraduate students were participated and descriptions of participants' responds were analyzed. As the result, four patterns of descriptive fault on the process of generating hypothesis were classified; 1) descriptive fault from the causalities, 2) descriptive fault from repetition of observational facts, 3) descriptive fault from the priority of prior knowledge, and 4) descriptive fault from negation of the observational facts. From the result, the researcher was able to explore the faults caused by pre-service elementary students' prior knowledge through the observational descriptive analysis with hypothetical descriptive analysis.
참고문헌 (41)
- 권용주, "예비 과학교사들의 가설 창안 과정에 대한 탐색적 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 20(1), pp.29~42 (2000)
- 권용주, "과학적 가설 지식의 생성 과정에 대한 바탕이론", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(5), pp.458~469 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
- 김범기, "과학개념과 인지적 갈들의 유형이 학생들의 개념변화에 미치는 영향", 한국과학교육학회지, 15(4), pp.472~486 (1995)
- 류시경, "낮게 구조화된 과학적 문제 상황에서 고등학생들의 문제발견 활동 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 26(6), pp.765~774 (2006), 한국과학교육학회
- 박종원, "학생의 과학적 설명가설의 생성과정 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 20(4), pp.667~679 (2000)
- 박종원, "학생의 과학적 설명가설의 생성과정 분석: 대학생의 반응 분석을 중심으로", 한국과학교육학회지, 21(3), pp.609~621 (2001)
- 박종원, "과학적 가설 검증을 위한 학생들의 실험 설계 내용 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(2), pp.200~213 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
- 박종원, "과학적 관찰의 의미와 탐구과정에서 학생들의 관찰 행동 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 19(3), pp.487~500 (1999)
- 양일호, "초?중등학교 과학 실험수업의 유형 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 27(3), pp.235~241 (2007), 한국과학교육학회
- 정용재, "Pierce의 귀추법 양식을 이용한 교육대학생들이 생성한 가설의 특징분석", 초등과학교육, 25(2), pp.126~140 (2006), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 정진수, "과학적 가설 생성에 대한 삼원 귀추 모형의 개발과 적용", 박사, pp.2004
- 정진수, "동물학 과제에서 초등학교 예비 교사들이 생성한 과학적 가설의 구조와 유형", 초등과학교육, 26(2), pp.201~208 (2007), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Aicken, F., "The nature of science" (1984), Heinemann
- Anderson, C., "Teaching for meaningful self-regulated learning of science in Advances in research on teaching", pp.265~305 (1989), JAI Press
- Anton, M., "Experimenting in chemistry: The role of question asking" (2006), University of Munichm Germany
- Auty, G., "Practical assessment for advanced level", School Science Review, 78(284), pp.65~72 (1997)
- BouJaoude, S. B., "A study of the nature of students' understandings about the concept of burning", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), pp.689~704 (1991)
- Carey, S., "An experiment is when you try it and see if it works: A study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge", International Journal of Science Education, 11, pp.514~519 (1989)
- Doran, R., "Research on assessment in science in Handbook of research in science teaching and learning", pp.388~442 (1994), Macmillan
- Glaserfeld, E., "An introduction of radical constructivism in The invented reality" (1984), W. W. Norton
- Graesser, A., "Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point & Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART", Educational Psychologist, 40, pp.225~234 (2005)
- Hanson, N., "Patterns of discovery" (1961), Cambridge University Press
- Hodson, D., "A Critical look at practical work in school science", The School Science Review, 70(356), pp.65~78 (1990)
- Hodson, D., "Practical work in school science: Exploring some directions for change", International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), pp.755~760 (1996)
- Hofstein, A., "The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century", Science Education, 88, pp.28~54 (2004)
- Klahr, D., "Exploring science. The cognition and development of discovery processes" (2000), MIT Press
- Klahr, D., "Dual space search during scientific reasoning", Cognitive Science, 12, pp.1~48 (1988)
- Lawson, A., "Science teaching and the development of thinking" (1995), Wadsworth Publishing Company
- Lederman, N., "Scientific inquiry, and science education reform in the US", Science Education, 88, pp.402~404 (2004)
- Lunetta, V., "The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and context for contemporary teaching in International handbook of science education", pp.249~262 (1998), Macmillan
- Martin, M., "Philosophy of scientific method" (1972), Hafner
- Millar, R., "What is scientific method and can it be taught? in Skills and process in science education: A critical analysis", pp.47~62 (1989), Routledge
- Neber, H., "Promoting pre-experimental activities in high-school chemistry: Focusing on the role of students' epistemic questions", International Journal of Science Education, 30, pp.1801~1821 (2008)
- Niaz, M., "Cognitive conflict as a teaching strategy in solving chemistry problem: A dialectic constructivist perceptive", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(9), pp.959~970 (1995)
- Pearsall, R., "Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology", Science Education, 81(2), pp.193~215 (1997)
- Schauble, L., "Causal models and experimentation strategies in scientific studies", Review of Educational Research, 66, pp.181~221 (1991)
- Strike, K., "A conceptual change view of learning and understanding in Cognitive structure and conceptual change" (1985), Academic Press
- Tobin, K., "Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning", School Science and Mathematics, 90, pp.403~417 (1990)
- Tobin, K., "Relationships between formal reasoning ability, locus of control, academic engagement, and integrated process skill development", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, pp.113~121 (1982)
- Yip, D. Y., "Biology students' understanding of the concept of hypothesis", Teaching Science, 53(4), pp.23~27 (2007)
- Zohar, A., "Exploring the effects of cognitive conflict and direct teaching for students of different academic levels", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), pp.829~855 (2005)
