본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

의미 네트워크 분석법을 활용한 초등 예비교사들이 생각하는 과학에 대한 의미 분석

An Analysis of Scientific Concepts Pre-service Elementary School Teachers Have through Semantic Network Analysis

김동렬
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)|2013.08|초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)|제32권 제3호|pp. 327-345

0

조회

0

다운로드

20

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

semantic network analysisscientific questionssomething scientificbeing scientificscientific events
주제분류교육학

초록

This study aims to investigate how pre-service elementary school teachers understand ‘something scientific’, ‘being scientific’, ‘scientific events’ and ‘scientific questions’ through semantic network analysis. To achieve this purpose, this study carried out a central analysis of the frequency and density of words and the degree of connection between key words, a concentric analysis, a click analysis and a common network analysis through text semantic network analysis by using NetMiner 4.0 Program. Based on the results of these analyses, this study came to the following conclusions. Firstly, in perceiving ‘something scientific’, pre-service elementary school teachers recognized ‘verification’, ‘objective’ and ‘experiment’ as most important words. In other words, they perceived that main grounds for something scientific should be provided through clear facts, possible to be verified and accompanied by an exact and logical theoretical system. In regard to ‘being scientific’, they perceived ‘explanation’, ‘objective’ and ‘verification’ as most important words, while having a traditional point of view that science is a set that can be explained objectively. Secondly, in regard that the term, ‘observation’, is contained in ‘scientific events’, they showed a high rate of understanding it as a scientific event. In regard to scientifical reasons, they showed the highest frequency of ‘observation’, and for unscientific reasons, they showed the highest frequency of ‘behavior’. In perceiving ‘scientific questions’, they showed the highest frequency of determining bacteria-related questions as scientific. As a reason why they thought as scientific, they mentioned ‘observation’ most frequently like ‘scientific events’, while mentioning ‘value judgement’ as a reason why they thought as unscientific most frequently. From the results of integrated network analysis, this study found out that words pre-service teachers commonly used in stating scientific events or scientific questions were overlapped with words they mentioned for scientific events or scientific questions. As a result, it was found there were many pre-service teachers having interpreted scientific words without clearly distinguishing scientific events or scientific questions.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate how pre-service elementary school teachers understand ‘something scientific’, ‘being scientific’, ‘scientific events’ and ‘scientific questions’ through semantic network analysis. To achieve this purpose, this study carried out a central analysis of the frequency and density of words and the degree of connection between key words, a concentric analysis, a click analysis and a common network analysis through text semantic network analysis by using NetMiner 4.0 Program. Based on the results of these analyses, this study came to the following conclusions. Firstly, in perceiving ‘something scientific’, pre-service elementary school teachers recognized ‘verification’, ‘objective’ and ‘experiment’ as most important words. In other words, they perceived that main grounds for something scientific should be provided through clear facts, possible to be verified and accompanied by an exact and logical theoretical system. In regard to ‘being scientific’, they perceived ‘explanation’, ‘objective’ and ‘verification’ as most important words, while having a traditional point of view that science is a set that can be explained objectively. Secondly, in regard that the term, ‘observation’, is contained in ‘scientific events’, they showed a high rate of understanding it as a scientific event. In regard to scientifical reasons, they showed the highest frequency of ‘observation’, and for unscientific reasons, they showed the highest frequency of ‘behavior’. In perceiving ‘scientific questions’, they showed the highest frequency of determining bacteria-related questions as scientific. As a reason why they thought as scientific, they mentioned ‘observation’ most frequently like ‘scientific events’, while mentioning ‘value judgement’ as a reason why they thought as unscientific most frequently. From the results of integrated network analysis, this study found out that words pre-service teachers commonly used in stating scientific events or scientific questions were overlapped with words they mentioned for scientific events or scientific questions. As a result, it was found there were many pre-service teachers having interpreted scientific words without clearly distinguishing scientific events or scientific questions.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. 교육과학기술부, "과학과 교육과정", 교육과학기술부, ~ (2009)
  2. 김용학, "사회 연결망 이론" (2007), 박영사
  3. 나지연, "과학의 본성에 대한 검사 도구를 활용한 연구의 개관과 분석 (1990~2009)", 초등과학교육, 29(3), pp.292~306 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
  4. 방미정, "초등학생의 인지 수준에 따른 과학의 본성에 대한 명시적 교수 효과 분석", 초등과학교육, 29(3), pp.277~291 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
  5. 손동원, "사회 네트워크 분석" (2002), 경문사
  6. 이준기, "언어 네트워크 분석법을 통한 중학교 과학영재들의 사실, 가설, 이론, 법칙과 과학적인 것의 의미에 대한 인식 조사", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(5), pp.823~840 (2012), 한국과학교육학회
  7. 이준기, "언어 네트워크 분석법을 활용한초등학교 및 중학교 과학영재들의 ‘과학적’의 의미에대한 인식 비교", 과학영재교육, 4(1), pp.29~42 (2012)
  8. 이혜준, "의미 네트워크 분석을 통한 프랜차이즈 교육 프로그램 개발", Korea Business Review, 14(2), pp.105~128 (2010), 한국경영학회
  9. 조일현, "협동학습팀 내 사회연결망 지수가 학습 성과에 미치는 영향", 교육공학연구, 24(4), pp.295~317 (2008), 한국교육공학회
  10. 최준환, "과학사를 활용한 과학수업 적용을 통한 중학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 이해의 발달", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(2), pp.221~239 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
  11. 현영섭, "대학 성인학습자의 학습저해 요소와 학습저해 해소 방법에 대한 개념 연결망 분석", 한국HRD연구, 6(3), pp.23~48 (2011), 한국인적자원개발전략연구소
  12. Abd-El-Khalick, F., "Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), pp.835~855 (2008)
  13. Aikenhead, G., "Integrating the scientific disciplines in science education", Gesellschaft fur der Chemie und Physik, pp.1997
  14. Aikenhead, G. S., "The development of a new instrument: “Views on science-technologysociety” (VOSTS)", Science Education, 76(5), pp.477~491 (1992)
  15. Akerson, V. L., "Teaching nature of science explicitly in a first-grade internship setting", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), pp.377~394 (2006)
  16. Ash, D., "Reflective scientific sense-making dialogue in two languages : the science in the dialogue and the dialogue in the science", Science Education, 88(6), pp.855~884 (2004)
  17. Bell, R. L., "Teaching the nature of science: three critical questions. Best Practices in Science Education" (2009), Monograph
  18. "석사", Dokuz Eylul University, 2005
  19. Çoban, G. U., "The turkish rrimary students’ understanding of scientific events and questions", Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(2), pp.23~38 (2010)
  20. Çoban, G. U., "The scientific understanding level of prospective science teachers", Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9(3), pp.237~254 (2011)
  21. Driver, R., "Young people’s images of science" (1996), Open University Press
  22. Edmondson, K. M., "The interplay of scientific epistemological views, learning strategies, and attitudes of college students", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(6), pp.547~559 (1993)
  23. Ewers, T. G., "Teacher directed versus learning cycles methods: effects on science process skills of mastery and teachers efficacy among elementary education students", 박사, pp.2001
  24. Flavell, J. H., "Cognitive development : children’s knowledge about the mind", Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), pp.21~45 (1999)
  25. Giere, R. N., "Understanding scientific reasoning" (1991), harcourt brace Jovanovich College Publishers
  26. Harlen, W., "Teaching, learning and assessing science 5-12" (2000), Sage Publications
  27. Hodson, D., "Going beyond cultural pluralism : science education for sociopolitical action", Science Education, 83(6), pp.775~796 (1999)
  28. Irez, S., "Are we prepared? an assessment of preservice science teacher educators’ beliefs about nature of science", Science Education, 90(6), pp.1113~1143 (2006)
  29. Leach, J., "Students’ understanding of nature of science, In Research in science education in Europe" (1996), Routledgefalmer
  30. Lederman, N. G., "Students’ perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change", Science Education, 74(2), pp.225~239 (1990)
  31. Lederman, N. G., "Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science : A review of the research", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), pp.331~359 (1992)
  32. Lederman, N. G., "Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice : Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), pp.916~929 (1999)
  33. Matthews, M. R., "Editorial", Science & Education, 6(1), pp.322~329 (1997)
  34. McComas, W. F., "A textbook case of the nature of science : Laws and theories in the science of biology", International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), pp.141~155 (2003)
  35. McDonald, C. V., "The influence of explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction on preservice primary teachers’ views of nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), pp.1137~1164 (2010)
  36. McErlean, J., "Philosophies of science : From foundations to contemporary issues" (2000), Wadsworth, Thompson Learning
  37. Meyling, H., "How to change students’ conceptions of the epistemology of science", Science & Education, 6(4), pp.397~416 (1997)
  38. Root-Bernstein, R., "On defining scientific theory: Creationism considered, In Science and creationism", pp.64~94 (1984), Oxford University Press
  39. Ryan, A. G., "Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science", Science Education, 76(6), pp.559~580 (1992)
  40. Ryder, J., "Undergraduate science students’ images of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), pp.201~219 (1999)
  41. Solomon, J., "Large-scale exploration of pupil’s understanding of the nature of science", Science Education, 80(5), pp.493~508 (1996)
  42. Songer, N. B., "How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration?", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), pp.761~784 (1991)
  43. Sormunen, K., "Seventh-graders epistemic views related to science lessons", 박사, pp.2004
  44. Southerland, S. A., "Portraying science in the classroom: The manifestation of scientists’ beliefs in classroom practice", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), pp.669~691 (2003)
  45. Tairab, H. H., "How do pre-service and in-service science teachers view the nature of science and technology?", Research in Science and Technological Education, 19(2), pp.235~250 (2001)
  46. Thomas, G., "Why should we promote the public understanding of science?, In Scientific literacy papers" (1987), Oxford University Department for External Studies
  47. Tobin, K., "Beliefs about the nature of science and the enacted sience Curriculum", Science & Education, 6(1), pp.355~371 (1997)
  48. Tuberty, M. B., "Student understanding of scientific hypotheses, theories & laws: exploring the influence of a non-majors college introductory Biology course", International Journal of Biology Education, 1(1), pp.22~44 (2011)
  49. "Turk Eğtim Bilimleri Dergisi", 2009, 165~184
  50. Unal, G., "To what extent science teachers are constructivist in their classrooms", Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2(10), pp.40~50 (2006)
  51. Zembylas, M., "Preservice teacher attitudes and emotions : Individual spaces, community conservations and transformations", Research in Science Education, 32(3), pp.329~351 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

의미네트워크를 활용한 초등학교 예비교사들의 물질 개념체계 분석김도욱한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2018 · 제37권 제1호키워드 네트워크 분석을 통한 초등 예비교사를 대상으로 한 과학교육 연구 동향 탐색김동렬사단법인 인문사회과학기술융합학회 · 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지2018 · 제8권 제7호키워드 네트워크 분석을 통해 알아본 초등교사의 과학수업 전문성에 대한 학생의 인식성승민, 여상인한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2018 · 제37권 제1호언어 네트워크 분석법을 활용한 초등학교 및 중학교 과학영재들의‘과학적’의 의미에 대한 인식 비교이준기, 하민수한국과학영재교육학회 · 과학영재교육2012 · 제4권 제1호언어 네트워크 분석법을 통한 중학교 과학영재들의 사실, 가설, 이론, 법칙과 과학적인 것의 의미에 대한 인식 조사이준기, 하민수한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2012 · 제32권 제5호과학 탐구에서 사용한 개념의 일치성김영신, 임수민, 정성엽뇌·AI기반교육연구소 · Brain, Digital, & Learning2019 · 제9권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

과학 기반 STEAM에 의한 ‘빛’ 단원 학습이 과학 학습 동기, 흥미 및 과학 탐구 능력에 미치는 효과박성진, 유병길pp. 225-238전통문화를 활용한 환경교육 프로그램이 초등학생의 환경태도에 미치는 영향김명환, 김남일, 박헌우pp. 239-249스마트러닝 기반의 생태 STEAM 교육 프로그램 개발이성희pp. 250-259한국초등과학교육의 최근 연구 동향 분석홍영식, 이아람pp. 260-268인식 행위로서 수업 담화 분석: 초등 과학 수업을 중심으로오필석, 안유민pp. 269-284
원문 보기