본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Moderating Role of Personal Need for Structure on the Effects of Process versus Outcome Simulations on the Evaluation of Really New Products

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Really new products (RNPs) provide novel benefits yet many consumers are reluctant to accept these highly innovative new products. Previous literature has shown that mental simulation is an effective method for enhancing the evaluation of RNPs. However, Castano et al. (2008) and Zhao, Hoeffler, and Zauberman (2011) demonstrate conflicting results as to which type of mental simulation (i.e., process versus outcome) is more effective for the enhancement of RNP evaluation. The authors try to reconcile these results by incorporating a moderating variable which is personal need for structure (PNS). PNS is an individual difference variable that taps the differences in people’s propensity to cognitively structure and simplify their environment (Neuberg and Newsom 1993). From the analysis of the previous two works, the authors point out that consumers’ susceptibility to uncertainty may contribute to the different results, and suggest that this susceptibility is dependent on consumers’ PNS. To test the hypotheses established, an experiment was conducted. Waterless washing machine was presented as a RNP and PNS was measured by using the 12-item PNS Scale (Thompson et al. 2001). The results of the study show that for high-PNS consumers, process simulation is more effective than outcome simulation for enhancing the evaluation of a RNP, whereas for low-PNS consumers, outcome simulation is more effective than process simulation. This research contributes to the mental simulation and new product literature by suggesting and verifying that PNS moderates the effects of process versus outcome simulations for enhancing the evaluation of RNPs. This research provides important managerial implications for marketing managers of RNPs, indicating that they should take account of the target consumers’ PNS in planning marketing communications. Specifically, when targeting high-PNS consumers, marketing communications that encourage process simulation may be more effective than those that encourage outcome simulation. In contrast, when targeting low-PNS consumers, marketing communications that encourage outcome simulation may be more effective than those that encourage process simulation.

Abstract

Really new products (RNPs) provide novel benefits yet many consumers are reluctant to accept these highly innovative new products. Previous literature has shown that mental simulation is an effective method for enhancing the evaluation of RNPs. However, Castano et al. (2008) and Zhao, Hoeffler, and Zauberman (2011) demonstrate conflicting results as to which type of mental simulation (i.e., process versus outcome) is more effective for the enhancement of RNP evaluation. The authors try to reconcile these results by incorporating a moderating variable which is personal need for structure (PNS). PNS is an individual difference variable that taps the differences in people’s propensity to cognitively structure and simplify their environment (Neuberg and Newsom 1993). From the analysis of the previous two works, the authors point out that consumers’ susceptibility to uncertainty may contribute to the different results, and suggest that this susceptibility is dependent on consumers’ PNS. To test the hypotheses established, an experiment was conducted. Waterless washing machine was presented as a RNP and PNS was measured by using the 12-item PNS Scale (Thompson et al. 2001). The results of the study show that for high-PNS consumers, process simulation is more effective than outcome simulation for enhancing the evaluation of a RNP, whereas for low-PNS consumers, outcome simulation is more effective than process simulation. This research contributes to the mental simulation and new product literature by suggesting and verifying that PNS moderates the effects of process versus outcome simulations for enhancing the evaluation of RNPs. This research provides important managerial implications for marketing managers of RNPs, indicating that they should take account of the target consumers’ PNS in planning marketing communications. Specifically, when targeting high-PNS consumers, marketing communications that encourage process simulation may be more effective than those that encourage outcome simulation. In contrast, when targeting low-PNS consumers, marketing communications that encourage outcome simulation may be more effective than those that encourage process simulation.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Alexander, David L., "As Time Goes By: Do Cold Feet Follow Warm Intentions for Really New Versus Incrementally New Products?", Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), pp.307~319 (2008)
  2. Budner, Stanley, "Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Variable", Journal of Personality, 30(1), pp.29~50 (1962)
  3. Castano, Raquel, "Managing Consumer Uncertainty in the Adoption of New Products: Temporal Distance and Mental Simulation", Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), pp.320~336 (2008)
  4. Dahl, Darren W., "Visualizing the Self: Exploring the Potential Benefits and Drawbacks for New Product Evaluation", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(4), pp.259~267 (2004)
  5. Escalas, Jennifer Edson, "Process Versus Outcome Thought Focus and Advertising", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), pp.246~254 (2003)
  6. Escalas, Jennifer Edson, "Understanding the Effects of Process-Focused versus Outcome- Focused Thought in Response to Advertising", Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), pp.274~285 (2004)
  7. Gourville, John T., "Eager Sellers & Stony Buyers", Harvard Business Review, 84(6), pp.98~106 (2006)
  8. Gregan-Paxton, Jennifer, "Consumer Learning by Analogy: A Model of Internal Knowledge Transfer", Journal of Consumer Research, 24(3), pp.266~284 (1997)
  9. Herzenstein, Michal, "Adoption of New and Really New Products: The Effects of Self-Regulation Systems and Risk Salience", Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), pp.251~260 (2007)
  10. Hoeffler, Steve, "Measuring Preferences for Really New Products", Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4), pp.406~420 (2003)
  11. Hoeffler, Steve, "Optimal Marketing for Really New Products: Using a Consumer Perspective to Improve Communications, In Cracking the Code: Leveraging Consumer Psychology to Drive Profitability" (2011), M. E. Sharpe, Inc
  12. Irwin, Julie R., "Misleading Heuristics and Moderated Multiple Regression Models", Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), pp.100~109 (2001)
  13. Jhang, Ji Hoon, "Get It? Got It. Good! Enhancing New Product Acceptance by Facilitating Resolution of Extreme Incongruity", Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), pp.247~259 (2012)
  14. A Moderating Role of Personal Need for Structure on the Evaluation of Incrementally New Products Versus Really New Products, "Kim, Jun San", Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, ~ (2012)
  15. Landau, Mark J., "Windows into Nothingness: Terror Management, Meaninglessness, and Negative Reactions to Modern Art", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), pp.879~892 (2006)
  16. Landau, Mark J., "A Function of Form : Terror Management and Structuring the Social World", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), pp.190~210 (2004)
  17. Moreau, C. Page, "Entrenched Knowledge Structures and Consumer Response to New Products", Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), pp.14~29 (2001)
  18. Moskowitz, Gordon B., "Individual Differences in Social Categorization: The Influence of Personal Need for Structure on Spontaneous Trait Inferences", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), pp.132~142 (1993)
  19. Neuberg, Steven L., "Personal Need for Structure: Individual Differences in the Desire for Simple Structure", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), pp.113~131 (1993)
  20. 박세훈, "해석 전략과 소비자 목표가 융합제품에 대한 소비자 반응에 미치는 영향", 아시아마케팅저널, 13(4), pp.1~27 (2012), 한국마케팅학회
  21. Pham, Lien B., "From Thought to Action: Effects of Process- Versus Outcome-Based Mental Simulations on Performance", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), pp.250~260 (1999)
  22. Rivkin, Inna D., "The Effects of Mental Simulation on Coping with Controllable Stressful Events", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(12), pp.1451~1462 (1999)
  23. Schaller, Mark, "The Prejudiced Personality Revisited: Personal Need for Structure and Formation of Erroneous Group Stereotypes", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), pp.544~555 (1995)
  24. Schneider, Joan, "Why Most Product Launches Fail", Harvard Business Review, 89(4), pp.21~23 (2011)
  25. Taylor, Shelley E., "Harnessing the Imagination: Mental Simulation, Self- Regulation, and Coping", American Psychologist, 53(4), pp.429~439 (1998)
  26. Taylor, Shelley E., "The Effect of Mental Simulation on Goal-Directed Performance", Imagery and Human Development, 18(4), pp.253~268 (1999)
  27. Taylor, Shelley E., "Coping and the Simulation of Events", Social Cognition, 7(2), pp.174~194 (1989)
  28. Thompson, Megan. M., "The Personal Need for Structure (PNS) and Personal Fear of Invalidity (PFI) Scales: Historical Perspectives, Present Applications and Future Directions, In Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition", Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition, pp.19~39 (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  29. van den Bos, Kees, "An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Cultural Norms and Values: The Impact of Uncertainty and Mortality Salience on Reactions to Violations and Bolstering of Cultural Worldviews", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(2), pp.91~113 (2005)
  30. Wind, Jerry, "Editorial: Issues and Opportunities in New Product Development: An Introduction to the Special Issue", Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), pp.1~12 (1997)
  31. Zhao, Min, "The Role of Imagination-Focused Visualization on New Product Evaluation", Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1), pp.46~55 (2009)
  32. Zhao, Min, "Mental Simulation and Preference Consistency over Time: The Role of Process- Versus Outcome-Focused Thoughts", Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), pp.379~388 (2007)
  33. Zhao, Min, "Mental Simulation and Product Evaluation: The Affective and Cognitive Dimensions of Process Versus Outcome Simulation", Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), pp.827~839 (2011)
  34. Ziamou, Paschalina, "The Effect of the Degree of Newness of a 'Really New' Product on Consumers' Judgments", Advances in Consumer Research, 26(1), pp.368~371 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)