The Role of Processing Fluency in Product Innovativeness Judgment
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The metacognitive experience of the ease or difficulty with which new, external information can be processed, referred to as ‘processing fluency,’ has been shown to influence a wide range of human judgments including truth judgments, familiarity judgments, risk perception, evaluation, and preference (see Alter and Oppenheimer 2009 for a review). The current research explores the possibility of a consumer’s product innovativeness judgment based on the difficulty of processing new information. In specific, this study examines if the inferential link between (dis)fluency-(un)familiarity can feed into the perception of innovativeness. This study also explores how a consumer’s processing motivation can moderate the consumer’s reliance on processing fluency in judgments and how the influence of fluency can vary depending on judgment task orders. In an experiment, participants rated a new product’s innovativeness and then indicated their product attitude (or vice versa depending on the judgment task order condition) after reading a product review article that was printed in either an easy-to-read or a difficult-to-read font (for fluency manipulation). The findings show that low need for cognition individuals infer higher product innovativeness when processing product information is difficult rather than easy, consistent with the common assumption that ‘new information is more difficult to process than familiar information.’ The findings also suggest that once low fluency is attributed to innovativeness, it may no longer lead to a negative response to the product. High need for cognition individuals’ judgments on product innovativeness are not affected by fluency. The findings also demonstrate a judgment task order effect on the use of fluency in judgments (e.g., Xu and Schwarz 2005). This study provides the first evidence that an individual’s fluency experience can be used as a source of information in product innovativeness judgments especially under low processing motivation conditions. The findings can help marketers better understand the malleability of consumer judgments and perceptions of product characteristics (e.g., product innovativeness) by demonstrating an interesting interplay of processing fluency, processing motivation, and judgment task-related contextual factors.
Abstract
The metacognitive experience of the ease or difficulty with which new, external information can be processed, referred to as ‘processing fluency,’ has been shown to influence a wide range of human judgments including truth judgments, familiarity judgments, risk perception, evaluation, and preference (see Alter and Oppenheimer 2009 for a review). The current research explores the possibility of a consumer’s product innovativeness judgment based on the difficulty of processing new information. In specific, this study examines if the inferential link between (dis)fluency-(un)familiarity can feed into the perception of innovativeness. This study also explores how a consumer’s processing motivation can moderate the consumer’s reliance on processing fluency in judgments and how the influence of fluency can vary depending on judgment task orders. In an experiment, participants rated a new product’s innovativeness and then indicated their product attitude (or vice versa depending on the judgment task order condition) after reading a product review article that was printed in either an easy-to-read or a difficult-to-read font (for fluency manipulation). The findings show that low need for cognition individuals infer higher product innovativeness when processing product information is difficult rather than easy, consistent with the common assumption that ‘new information is more difficult to process than familiar information.’ The findings also suggest that once low fluency is attributed to innovativeness, it may no longer lead to a negative response to the product. High need for cognition individuals’ judgments on product innovativeness are not affected by fluency. The findings also demonstrate a judgment task order effect on the use of fluency in judgments (e.g., Xu and Schwarz 2005). This study provides the first evidence that an individual’s fluency experience can be used as a source of information in product innovativeness judgments especially under low processing motivation conditions. The findings can help marketers better understand the malleability of consumer judgments and perceptions of product characteristics (e.g., product innovativeness) by demonstrating an interesting interplay of processing fluency, processing motivation, and judgment task-related contextual factors.
참고문헌 (53)
- Aarts, Henk, "How Often Did I Do It? Experienced Ease of Retrieval and Frequency Estimates of Past Behavior", Acta Psychologica, 103, pp.77~89 (1999)
- Alter, Adam L., "Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, pp.219~235 (2009)
- Cacioppo, John T., "The Need for Cognition", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), pp.116~131 (1982)
- Cacioppo, John T., "The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition", Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), pp.306~307 (1984)
- Cacioppo, John T., "Semantic, Evaluative, and Self-referent Processing: Memory, Cognitive Effort, and Somatovisceral Activity", Psychophysiology, 22(4), pp.371~384 (1985)
- Cohen, Jacob, "Applied Multiple Regression, In Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences" (1983), Lawrence Erlbaum
- "Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie", 2003, 65~78
- Galak, Jeff, "The Virtues of Opaque Prose: How Lay Beliefs about Fluency Influence Perceptions of Quality", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, pp.250~253 (2011)
- Garbarino, Ellen C., "Cognitive Effort, Affect, and Choice", Journal of Consumer Research, 24, pp.147~158 (1997)
- Greifeneder, Rainer, "When Do People Rely on Affective and Cognitive Feelings in Judgment? A Review", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), pp.107~141 (2011)
- Haddock, Geoffrey, "It’s Easy to Like or Dislike Tony Blair: Accessibility Experiences and the Favourability of Attitude Judgments", British Journal of Psychology, 93(2), pp.257~267 (2002)
- Haddock, Geoffrey, "Forming Judgments of Attitude Certainty, Intensity, and Importance: The Role of Subjective Experiences", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(7), pp.771~782 (1999)
- Hirt, Edward R., "Activating a Mental Simulation Mind-set through Generation of Alternatives: Implications for Debiasing in Related and Unrelated Domains", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, pp.374~383 (2004)
- Jacoby, Larry L., "Memory Influences Subjective Experience: Noise Judgments", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(2), pp.240~247 (1988)
- Jacoby, Larry L., "Memory Attributions, In Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honor of Endel Tulving", pp.391~422 (1989), Erlbaum
- Lee, Angela Y., "The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation", Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), pp.151~165 (2004)
- Lee, Yikuan, "The Impact of Communication Strategy on Launching New Products: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20, pp.4~21 (2003)
- McGlone, Matthew S., "Birds of a Feather Flock Conjointly (?): Rhyme as Reason in Aphorisms", Psychological Science, 11(5), pp.424~428 (2000)
- Mick, David G., "Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies", Journal of Consumer Research, 25, pp.123~143 (1998)
- Monahan, Jennifer L., "Subliminal Mere Exposure: Specific, General, and Diffuse Effects", Psychological Science, 11(6), pp.462~466 (2000)
- Novemsky, Nathan, "Preference Fluency in Choice", Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), pp.347~356 (2007)
- Oppenheimer, Daniel M., "Consequences of Erudite Vernacular Utilized Irrespective of Necessity: Problems with Using Long Words Needlessly", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, pp.139~156 (2006)
- Oppenheimer, Daniel M., "A Rose in Any Other Font Wouldn’t Smell as Sweet: Fluency Effects in Categorization", Cognition, 106, pp.1178~1194 (2007)
- 박세범, "The Effect of Metacognitive Difficulty on Consumer Judgments: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Resources", 아시아마케팅저널, 14(2), pp.23~37 (2012), 한국마케팅학회
- Pocheptsova, Anastasiya, "Making Products Feel Special: When Metacognitive Difficulty Enhances Evaluation", Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), pp.1059~1069 (2010)
- Reber, Rolf, "Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth", Consciousness & Cognition: An International Journal, 8(3), pp.338~342 (1999)
- Reber, Rolf, "Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience?", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), pp.364~382 (2004)
- Reber, Rolf, "Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments", Psychological Science, 9(1), pp.45~48 (1998)
- Rogers, Everett M., "Diffusion of Innovations" (1995), Free Press
- Rothman, Alexander J., "Constructing Perceptions of Vulnerability: Personal Relevance and the Use of Experiential Information in Health Judgments", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(10), pp.1053~1064 (1998)
- Schwarz, Norbert, "Accessible Content and Accessibility Experiences: The Interplay of Declarative and Experiential Information in Judgment", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, pp.87~99 (1998)
- Schwarz, Norbert, "Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), pp.332~348 (2004)
- Schwarz, Norbert, "Ease of Retrieval as Information: Another Look at the Availability Heuristic", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), pp.195~202 (1991)
- Schwarz, Norbert, "Mood, Misattribution, and Judgments of Well- Being: Informative and Directive Functions of Affective States", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), pp.513~523 (1983)
- Schwarz, Norbert, "Political Knowledge, Attribution, and Inferred Interest in Politics: The Operation of Buffer Items", International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9(2), pp.191~195 (1997)
- Shah, Anuj K., "Easy Does It: The Role of Fluency in Cue Weighting", Judgment and Decision Making, 2(6), pp.371~379 (2007)
- Skurnik, Ian, "How Warnings about False Claims Become Recommendations", Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), pp.713~724 (2005)
- Song, Hyunjin, "If It’s Hard to Read, It’s Hard to Do: Processing Fluency Affects Effort Prediction and Motivation", Psychological Science, 19(10), pp.986~988 (2008)
- Song, Hyunjin, "If It’s Difficult to Pronounce, It Must Be Risky: Fluency, Familiarity, and Risk Perception", Psychological Science, 20(2), pp.135~138 (2009)
- Stepper, Sabine, "Proprioceptive Determinants of Emotional and Nonemotional Feelings", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), pp.211~220 (1993)
- Strack, Fritz, "Furrowing the Brow May Undermine Perceived Fame: The Role of Facial Feedback in Judgments of Celebrity", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(7), pp.762~768 (2000)
- Tormala, Zakary L., "Ease of Retrieval Effects in Persuasion: A Self-Validation Analysis", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), pp.1700~1712 (2002)
- Tukey, John W., "Exploratory Data Analysis" (1977), Addison-Wesley
- Tversky, Amos, "Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability", Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), pp.207~232 (1973)
- Wänke, Michaela, "There are Many Reasons to Drive a BMW: Does Imagined Ease of Argument Generation Influence Attitudes?", Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), pp.170~177 (1997)
- Whittlesea, Bruce W., "Illusions of Familiarity", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(6), pp.1235~1253 (1993)
- Whittlesea, Bruce W., "Illusions of Immediate Memory: Evidence of an Attributional Basis for Feelings of Familiarity and Perceptual Quality", Journal of Memory and Language, 29(6), pp.716~732 (1990)
- Winkielman, Piotr, "Mind at Ease Puts a Smile on the Face: Psychophysiological Evidence that Processing Facilitation Elicits Positive Affect", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), pp.989~1000 (2001)
- Winkielman, Piotr, "Prototypes are Attractive because they are Easy on the Mind", Psychological Science, 17(9), pp.799~806 (2006)
- Winkielman, Piotr, "The Role of Ease of Retrieval and Attribution in Memory Judgments: Judging Your Memory as Worse Despite Recalling More Events", Psychological Science, 9(2), pp.124~126 (1998)
- Winkielman, Piotr, "The Hedonic Marking of Processing Fluency: Implications for Evaluative Judgment, In The Psycho logy of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion", pp.189~217 (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Witherspoon, Dawn, "The Effect of a Prior Presentation on Temporal Judgments in a Perceptual Identification Task", Memory and Cognition, 13(2), pp.101~111 (1985)
- Xu, Jing, "Was It Long Ago or Unimportant? Diverging Inferences from Difficulty of Recall", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Consumer Psychology (2005)
