본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

과학 학습의 지식구성 과정에 대한 실제적 인식론 분석

Practical Epistemology Analysis on Epistemic Processin Science Learning

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study is to clarify the specific terms of epistemic and epistemological by reviewing the literature on epistemological understanding of science learning, examine the necessity of epistemic discourse analysis based on the view of social epistemology, and provide an exemplar of practical epistemology analysis for elementary children’s science learning. The review was conducted in terms of meaning and terminology about epistemic or epistemological approach to science learning, epistemology of/for science, and methodologies for epistemic discourse analysis. As an alternative way of epistemic discourse analysis in science classroom I employed practical epistemology analysis (by Wickman), evidence-explanation continuum (by Duschl), and DREEC diagram (by Maeng et al.). The methods were administered to an elementary science class for the third grade where children observed sedimentary rocks. Through the outcomes of analysis I sought to understand the processes how children collected data by observation, identified evidence, and constructed explanations about rocks. During the process of practical epistemology analysis the cases of four categories, such as encounter, stand-fast, gap, and relation, were identified. The sequence of encounter, stand fast, gap, and relation showed how children observed sedimentary rocks and how they came to learn the difference among the rocks. The epistemic features of children’s observation discourse, although different from scientists’ discourses during their own practices, showed data-only conversation, evidence-driven conversation, or explanation inducing conversation. Thus I argue even elementary children are able to construct their own knowledge and their epistemic practices are productive.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to clarify the specific terms of epistemic and epistemological by reviewing the literature on epistemological understanding of science learning, examine the necessity of epistemic discourse analysis based on the view of social epistemology, and provide an exemplar of practical epistemology analysis for elementary children’s science learning. The review was conducted in terms of meaning and terminology about epistemic or epistemological approach to science learning, epistemology of/for science, and methodologies for epistemic discourse analysis. As an alternative way of epistemic discourse analysis in science classroom I employed practical epistemology analysis (by Wickman), evidence-explanation continuum (by Duschl), and DREEC diagram (by Maeng et al.). The methods were administered to an elementary science class for the third grade where children observed sedimentary rocks. Through the outcomes of analysis I sought to understand the processes how children collected data by observation, identified evidence, and constructed explanations about rocks. During the process of practical epistemology analysis the cases of four categories, such as encounter, stand-fast, gap, and relation, were identified. The sequence of encounter, stand fast, gap, and relation showed how children observed sedimentary rocks and how they came to learn the difference among the rocks. The epistemic features of children’s observation discourse, although different from scientists’ discourses during their own practices, showed data-only conversation, evidence-driven conversation, or explanation inducing conversation. Thus I argue even elementary children are able to construct their own knowledge and their epistemic practices are productive.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Berland, L. K., "Epistemology in practice : Making scientific practices meaningful for students", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), pp.1082~1112 (2016)
  2. Chin, C., "Student-generated questions : A meaningful aspect of learning in science", International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), pp.521~549 (2002)
  3. Christie, F., "Genre and institution:Social process in the workplace and school" (1997), Continuum
  4. Conley, A. M., "Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, pp.186~204 (2004)
  5. Duschl, R., "Science education in three-part harmony : Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals", Review of Research in Education, 32, pp.268~291 (2008)
  6. Duschl, R. A., "Everyday assessment in the science classroom", pp.41~59 (2003), NSTA Press
  7. Elby, A., "On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology", Science Education, 85(5), pp.554~567 (2001)
  8. Ford, M. J., "Dialogic framing of scientific content for conceptual and epistemic understanding", Science Education, 96(3), pp.369~391 (2012)
  9. Goldman, A. I., "Social epistemology:Essential readings" (2011), Oxford University Press
  10. Greene, J. A., "Handbook of epistemic cognition" (2016), Routledge
  11. 하희수, "소집단 논변 활동에서 반응적 교수법이 학생들의 인식론적 프레이밍에 미치는 영향 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 37(1), pp.63~75 (2017), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  12. Hammer, D., "Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing", pp.169~190 (2002), Erlbaum
  13. Hammer, D., "Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, pp.53~90 (2003)
  14. Hammer, D., "Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective", pp.89~120 (2005), Information Age Publishing
  15. Hamza, K. M., "Supporting students’progression in science : Continuity between the particular, the contingent, and the general", Science Education, 97, pp.113~138 (2013)
  16. Hofer, B. K., "Personal epistemological research : Implications for learning and teaching", Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13, pp.353~383 (2001)
  17. Hofer, B. K., "Handbook of epistemic cognition", pp.19~38 (2016), Routledge
  18. Hofer, B. K., "The development of epistemological theories : Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning", Review of Educational Research, 67, pp.88~140 (1997)
  19. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., "Science education: An international course companion", pp.69~80 (2017), Sense Publishers
  20. Kelly, G. J., "Handbook of epistemic cognition", pp.393~408 (2016), Routledge
  21. Kelly, G. J., "Epistemic levels in argument : An analysis of university oceanography students’use of evidence in writing", Science Education, 86, pp.314~342 (2002)
  22. Khishfe, R., "Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), pp.551~578 (2002)
  23. King, P., "Developing reflective judgement: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults" (1994), Jossey-Bass
  24. Kitchener, R., "Folk epistemology : An introduction", New Ideas in Psychology, 20, pp.89~105 (2002)
  25. 권지숙, "실험 설계에서 나타난 소집단 논변활동 탐색: 활동에 대한 인식적 목표와 인식적 이해를 중심으로", 한국과학교육학회지, 36(1), pp.45~61 (2016), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  26. 이차은, "과학적 모형 구성 과정에서 나타난 사고 질문의 개념적 자원 활성화의 이해 -인식론적 프레이밍과 위치 짓기 프레이밍을 중심으로-", 한국과학교육학회지, 36(3), pp.471~483 (2016), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  27. Lee, M-H., "Exploring Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis", Science Education, 92, pp.191~220 (2008)
  28. Lidar, M., "Teaching and learning in the science classroom : The interplay between teachers’ epistemological moves and students’ practical epistemology", Science Education, 90, pp.148~163 (2006)
  29. Ligozat, F., "Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education", pp.2472~2481 (2011), University of Rzeszow
  30. Liu, S. Y., "Differences in the scientific epistemological views of undergraduate students", International Journal of Science Education, 30, pp.1055~1073 (2008)
  31. Lundqvist, E., "Epistemological norms and companion meanings in science classroom communication", Science Education, 93, pp.859~874 (2009)
  32. Maeng, S., "Variations in science teaching modalities and students’ pedagogic subject positioning through the discourse register and language code", Science Education, 95(3), pp.431~457 (2011)
  33. 맹승호, "논증 담화 분석 연구의 방법론적 고찰: 논증활동의 협력적 구성과 인식적 실행의 분석을 중심으로", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(4), pp.840~862 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
  34. , 2015
  35. National Research Council, "Inquiry and the national science education standards" (2000), National Academy Press
  36. National Research Council, "Taking science to school:Learning and teaching science in grades K-8" (2007), National Academy Press
  37. National Research Council., "Committee on a conceptual framework for new K-12 science education standards" (2012), The National Academies Press
  38. NGSS Lead States, "Next generation science standards" (2013), Achieve Inc
  39. 오필석, "인식 행위로서 수업 담화 분석: 초등 과학 수업을 중심으로", 초등과학교육, 32(3), pp.269~284 (2013), 한국초등과학교육학회
  40. 오필석, "고등학교 지구과학 수업의 담화적-인식적 기제 탐색", 한국지구과학회지, 36(4), pp.390~403 (2015), 한국지구과학회
  41. 오필석, "초등 과학 교사들의 교사 공동체 내에서의 학습의 특징과 인식적 믿음의 변화", 초등과학교육, 33(4), pp.683~699 (2014), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  42. 오필석, "Understanding of Science Classrooms in Different Countries through the Analysis of Discourse Modes for Building ‘Classroom Science Knowledge’ (CSK)", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(3), pp.597~625 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
  43. Quennerstedt, M., "Practical epistemologies in physical education practice", Sport, Education and Society, 18(3), pp.311~333 (2013)
  44. Russ, R., "Epistemology of science vs. epistemology for science", Science Education, 98, pp.388~396 (2014)
  45. Sandoval, W. A., "Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry", Science Education, 89, pp.634~656 (2005)
  46. Sandoval, W. A., "The quality of students’use of evidence in written scientific explanations", Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), pp.23~55 (2005)
  47. Schommer-Aikins, M., "Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing", pp.103~108 (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum
  48. Tsai, C. C., "Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths : A study of eighth graders’ scientific epistemological views and learning in lab activities", Science Education, 83, pp.654~674 (1999)
  49. Tsai, C. C., "Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning environments", Educational Research, 42, pp.193~205 (2000)
  50. Wickman, P-O., "The practical epistemologies of the classroom : A study of laboratory work", Science Education, 88, pp.325~344 (2004)
  51. Wickman, P-O., "Learning as discourse change : A sociocultural mechanism", Science Education, 86, pp.601~623 (2002)
  52. Wittgenstein, L., "Philosophical investigations" (1967), Blackwell
  53. Yang, F. Y., "Student views concerning evidence and the expert in reasoning a socio-scientific issue and personal epistemology", Educational Studies, 31, pp.65~84 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)