본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

초등과학영재학생의 과학지식과 과학창의성의 관계- 생명 영역을 중심으로 -

The Relationship between Scientific Content Knowledge and Scientific Creativity of Science-Gifted Elementary Students - Focusing on the Subject of Biology -

김민주|김현주|임채성
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)|2020.08|초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)|제39권 제3호|pp. 382-398|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.3.382

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

self-perceptionscientific creativityscience giftedscientific content knowledge
주제분류교육학

초록

This study aims to analyze the relationship between scientific content knowledge of science-gifted elementary students and their expression of scientific creativity, and the characteristics of divided groups according to the levels of their scientific content knowledge and scientific creativity. A science-gifted program was implemented to 33 forth-graders in the Science-Gifted Education Center of an education office in Seoul, Korea. The method of evaluating scientific knowledge was divided into well-structured paper-pencil test (asking specific and limited range of content knowledge of plants) and ill-structured descriptive test (stating all the knowledge they know about plants) to find out which methods were more related to scientific creativity. In addition, in order to find out the characteristics of each group according to the level of scientific content knowledge and scientific creativity, students were required to answer a questionnaire about their own self-perception of scientific knowledge and scientific creativity and how to obtain scientific knowledge. The main results of this study are as follows. First, Both well-structured paper-pencil test (r=.38) and ill-structured descriptive test (r=.51) results of elementary science gifted students were significantly correlated with scientific creativity. Second, As a result of the regression analysis on scientific creativity of science-gifted elementary students, both the knowledge measured by the two evaluation methods have the ability to explain scientific creativity. Third, the students were categorized into four groups according to the levels of their scientific content knowledge and their expression of scientific creativity, and the result showed that the higher the knowledge of science, the higher the scientific creativity. Fourth, the description about self-perception of scientific knowledge revealed that the highest percentage of Type LL students of all 13 students (53.8%, 7 students) answered ‘I have little knowledge of plants because I have little interest in them.’ Fifth, the description about self-perception of scientific knowledge revealed that the highest percentage of Type HH students of all 15 students (40%, 6 students) answered ‘I think my science creativity is high through my experience of scientific creativity. Sixth, the responses to the Questionnaire revealed that ‘reading’ was the most popular way to obtain scientific knowledge, with 27 out of total 33 students choosing it. In particular, all 18 students from Type HH (high scientific knowledge and high scientific creativity) and Type HL (high scientific knowledge and low scientific creativity) - those with high scientific knowledge - gave that response. On the basis of this research, we should explore practical teaching methods and environment for gifted students to improve their scientific creativity by revealing the nature of the factors that affect scientific creativity and analyzing relationship between knowledge and scientific creativity.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the relationship between scientific content knowledge of science-gifted elementary students and their expression of scientific creativity, and the characteristics of divided groups according to the levels of their scientific content knowledge and scientific creativity. A science-gifted program was implemented to 33 forth-graders in the Science-Gifted Education Center of an education office in Seoul, Korea. The method of evaluating scientific knowledge was divided into well-structured paper-pencil test (asking specific and limited range of content knowledge of plants) and ill-structured descriptive test (stating all the knowledge they know about plants) to find out which methods were more related to scientific creativity. In addition, in order to find out the characteristics of each group according to the level of scientific content knowledge and scientific creativity, students were required to answer a questionnaire about their own self-perception of scientific knowledge and scientific creativity and how to obtain scientific knowledge. The main results of this study are as follows. First, Both well-structured paper-pencil test (r=.38) and ill-structured descriptive test (r=.51) results of elementary science gifted students were significantly correlated with scientific creativity. Second, As a result of the regression analysis on scientific creativity of science-gifted elementary students, both the knowledge measured by the two evaluation methods have the ability to explain scientific creativity. Third, the students were categorized into four groups according to the levels of their scientific content knowledge and their expression of scientific creativity, and the result showed that the higher the knowledge of science, the higher the scientific creativity. Fourth, the description about self-perception of scientific knowledge revealed that the highest percentage of Type LL students of all 13 students (53.8%, 7 students) answered ‘I have little knowledge of plants because I have little interest in them.’ Fifth, the description about self-perception of scientific knowledge revealed that the highest percentage of Type HH students of all 15 students (40%, 6 students) answered ‘I think my science creativity is high through my experience of scientific creativity. Sixth, the responses to the Questionnaire revealed that ‘reading’ was the most popular way to obtain scientific knowledge, with 27 out of total 33 students choosing it. In particular, all 18 students from Type HH (high scientific knowledge and high scientific creativity) and Type HL (high scientific knowledge and low scientific creativity) - those with high scientific knowledge - gave that response. On the basis of this research, we should explore practical teaching methods and environment for gifted students to improve their scientific creativity by revealing the nature of the factors that affect scientific creativity and analyzing relationship between knowledge and scientific creativity.

참고문헌 (64)

  1. 강정하, "과학적 창의성과 시각예술적 창의성: 창의적 성취 사례의 영역보편성 및 영역특정성", 영재교육연구, 18(2), pp.201~237 (2008), 한국영재학회
  2. 곽수란, "가족배경이 인문계 고등학교 학생의 학업성취에 미치는 영향", 교육연구, 16, pp.17(1) (2004), 51~60
  3. 교육부, "영재교육진흥법", 교육부, ~ (2017)
  4. 김경근, "한국사회 교육격차의 실태 및 결정요인", 교육사회학연구, 15(3), pp.1~27 (2005), 한국교육사회학회
  5. 김명숙, "창의성의 영역 특수성", 교육심리연구, 16(2), pp.153~172 (2002), 한국교육심리학회
  6. 김민주, "초등과학영재학생의 자기주도성과 과학창의성의 관계", 초등과학교육, 36(4), pp.379~393 (2017), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  7. 김민주, "초등과학영재학생의 과학창의성에 대한 자기 평가, 동료 평가의 비교 분석", 초등과학교육, 38(4), pp.439~452 (2019), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  8. 김영정, "창의성과 비판적 사고", 인지과학, 13(4), pp.81~90 (2002), 한국인지과학회
  9. 김청자, "중등학생의 창의성과 성취동기 및 내재적 외재적동기와의 관계연구", 열린교육연구, 13(3), pp.75~101 (2005), 한국열린교육학회
  10. 김호상, "과학영재와 일반학생의 사교육 실태, 주관적 안녕감, 스트레스, 우울의 비교", 과학영재교육, 7(2), pp.67~82 (2015), 한국과학영재교육학회
  11. 류은희, "중학교 과학영재와 일반학생의 Peer Instruction을 통한 인지갈등: 문항의 난이도에 따른 비교를 중심으로", 영재교육연구, 22(1), pp.117~139 (2012), 한국영재학회[DOI]
  12. 박민정, "과학 영재교육 대상자 선발방법으로써 교사 추천제 분석: 학생의 과학적 태도, 탐구력, 사고력, 문제 해결력, 창의성을 중심으로", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(2), pp.111~119 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
  13. 박창남, "창의성 개발에 대한 지식교육적 접근", 창의력교육연구, 12(3), pp.173~185 (2012), 한국창의력교육학회
  14. 배진수, "초등학생의 자기효능감, 창의력성격과 창의성과의 관계", 초등교육연구, 13(2), pp.43~61 (2000)
  15. 백자연, "뇌기반 진화적 접근법에 따른 과학 자유탐구에 대한 초등학교 학생의 인식", 초등과학교육, 34(1), pp.109~122 (2015), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  16. 서혜애, "과학적 창의성과 과학영재교육의 방향", 영재교육연구, 14(1), pp.65~89 (2004)
  17. 성은현, "창의성 교육 평가 모델 개발의 필요성", 창의력교육연구, 13(3), pp.37~52 (2013), 한국창의력교육학회
  18. 송성수, "과학사의 사례를 활용한 과학자의 창의성에 관한 탐색적 연구: 다윈, 에디슨, 아인슈타인을 중심으로", 교사교육연구, 52(2), pp.227~236 (2013), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
  19. 송정숙, "초등학생의 독서활동과 창의성 및학업적 자아개념의 관계", 교육연구, 21, pp.72~102 (2007)
  20. 신지은, "과학 영재 할생과 일반 학생은 창의성에서 어떻게 다른가? - 서울대학교 과학영재교육센터 학생들 중심으로", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(1), pp.158~175 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
  21. 심경석, "학교 학습에서 독서는 왜 필요한가 : 유치원 국민학교 중학교 교육과정을 중심으로", pp.5~11 (1987), 금성출판사
  22. 안양희, "의료급여수급권자의 사례관리 요구측정도구의 타당도와 신뢰도 검증", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 42(4), pp.549~558 (2012), 한국간호과학회
  23. 안영미, "초중고생의 독서시간과 사교육시간이 학업성취에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2020
  24. 오종석, "초등과학영재아동과 일반 아동 부모의 학습관여와 지적호기심 및 과학창의성의 관계 연구", 수산해양교육연구, 26(5), pp.1119~1128 (2014), 한국수산해양교육학회
  25. 우현경, "사전지식 제공여부와 면접조건에 따른 4, 6세 유아의 사건 정기억과 오기억", 박사, 아동가족학과, pp.2013
  26. 유경훈, "학업성취에 영향을 미치는 학교적응, 자존감, 삶의 만족도의 구조적관계", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 14(6), pp.2700~2706 (2013), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
  27. 윤종건, "교사․학부모․직장인을 위한 창의력의이론과 실제" (1998), 원미사
  28. 윤초희, "지적으로 우수한 영재아의 형식적 사고, 초인지 및 창의력에 관한 연구", 교육심리연구, 18(1), pp.241~260 (2004), 한국교육심리학회
  29. 이수정, "중학생의 학업성취에 대한 사교육비 효과 분석", 교육재정경제연구, 18(1), pp.141~166 (2009), 한국교육재정경제학회
  30. 이정원, "창의성은 영역 특수적이다", 교육종합연구소 소식, 11, pp.7~14 (2004)
  31. 이철원, "초등학교 4학년 학생들의 과학 관련 독서가 과학 지식 습득에 미치는 영향", 석사, 초등과학교육, pp.2005
  32. 임동순, "영재학생의 메타인지와 자기주도적 학습능력", 자연과학 (2013)
  33. 임채성, "과학창의성 평가 공식의 개발과 적용", 초등과학교육, 33(2), pp.242~257 (2014), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  34. 최일호, "새로운 생각은 어떻게 가능한가 : 전문분야 창의성에 대한 학습과정 모형 접근", 한국심리학회지 : 일반, 20(2), pp.409~428 (2001)
  35. 황재연, "교원 원격연수에서 학습자 배경변인과 온라인 학습전략에 따른 학업성취도 및 교육만족도 분석", 교육정보미디어연구, 12(2), pp.255~274 (2006), 한국교육정보미디어학회
  36. Adderholdt, M. R., "Perfectionism:What’s bad about being too good?" (1999), Free Spirit
  37. Alexander, P. A., "Domain knowledge : Evolving themes and emerging concerns", Educational Psychology, 27, pp.33~51 (1992)
  38. Amabile, T. M., "Frontiers of creativity research:Beyond the basics", pp.223~254 (1987), Bearly
  39. Csikszentmihalyi, M., "Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention" (1996), Harper Collins Publishers
  40. Flavell, John H., "Cognitive development" (2002), Prentice Hall
  41. Fleiss, "Design and analysis of clinical experiments" (1993), Wiley
  42. Hayes, J. R., "Handbook of creativity", pp.135~145 (1989), Springer
  43. Hu, W., "A scientific creativity test for secondary school students", International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), pp.389~403 (2002)
  44. Izard, C. E., "Handbook of Emotions, 2", pp.253~264 (2000)
  45. Jonassen, D. H., "Instructional design models for well-structured and Ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes", Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), pp.65~94 (1997)
  46. LoCicero, K. A., "Multidimensional perfectionism in middle school age gifted students : A comparison to peers from the general cohort", Roeper Review, 22(3), pp.182~185 (2000)
  47. Martinsen, O., "Cognitive styles and experience in solving insight problems : Replication and extension", Creativie Research Journal, 8, pp.291~298 (1995)
  48. Mayer, R. E., "Handbook of creativity" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  50. Mumford, M. D., "Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research", Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), pp.107~120 (2003)
  51. Newton, D. P., "Assessing the creativity of scientific explanations in elementary science : An insider-outsider view of intuitive assessment in the hypothesis space", Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(3), pp.187~201 (2010)
  52. Pajares, F., "The role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problemsolving : A path analysis", Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, pp.193~203 (1994)
  53. Runco, M. A., "Creativity: Theories and themes :Research, development, and practice" (2006), Academic Press
  54. Runco, M. A., "Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential", Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), pp.66~75 (2012)
  55. Schank, R. C., "The creative attitude" (1988), Macmillan
  56. Schibeci, R. A., "Influence of students’background and perceptions on science attitudes and achievement", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(3), pp.177~187 (1986)
  57. Simonton, D. K., "Genius, creativity, and leadership" (1984), Harvard University Press
  58. Stefoff, R., "진화론과 다윈" (2002), 바다출판사
  59. Sternberg, R. J., "Handbook of human creativity" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  60. Sternberg, R. J., "Investing in creativity", American Psychologist, 51(7), pp.677~688 (1996)
  61. Sue C. W., "유아교육과 평가: 형식적 평가와 비형식적 평가의 균형 잡힌 활용" (2010), 정민사
  62. Assessing creativity: A guide for educators, "Treffinger, D. J.", National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, ~ (2002)
  63. Weisberg, R. W., "Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius" (1993), WH Freeman
  64. Weisberg, R. W., "Handbook of creativity", pp.226~250 (1999), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

과학영재교육 프로그램이 초등영재학생들의 과학창의성과 프로그램에 대한 인식에 미치는 영향강민석, 김범기, 신애경과학교육연구소 · 과학교육연구지2011 · 제35권 제1호초등과학영재학생의 과학창의성과 다중지능의 관계 - 생명 영역을 중심으로 -김민주, 임채성한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2020 · 제39권 제3호초등과학영재학생의 자기주도성과 과학창의성의 관계김민주, 임채성한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2017 · 제36권 제4호초등과학영재학생의 발표에 대한 인식 및 발표의 자발성과 과학창의성의 관계 분석김민주, 임채성한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2019 · 제38권 제3호초등학생의 창의 과정과 산물의 관계를 탐색하기 위한 과학 창의성 검사 도구 개발 - 생명 영역을 중심으로 -김민주, 임채성한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2021 · 제40권 제4호중학교 과학영재들의 과학 창의성 평가 사례 연구송신철, 심규철한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2017 · 제45권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

어플리케이션 기반 생물 관찰 기록 학습이 초등학생들의 과학 관련 태도에 미치는 영향박형민pp. 307-322초등학생 소집단 활동에서 성별 구성에 따른 언어적 상호작용 유형과 안정성 분석양가인, 김영신, 임수민pp. 323-337PCK에 근거한 초등학교 교사의 과학영재수업과 발명영재수업 구성과 실천의 특징 비교차유미, 강훈식pp. 338-352초등학교 과학 수업에서 과학영재 학생의 행동 특성이 일반 학생에게 미치는 영향에 대한 교사의 인식윤서정, 강훈식pp. 353-368초등과학영재학생의 과학창의성과 다중지능의 관계 - 생명 영역을 중심으로 -임채성, 김민주pp. 369-381
원문 보기