Informative Role of Marketing Activity in Financial Market: Evidence from Analysts’ Forecast Dispersion
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As advertising and promotions are categorized as operating expenses, managers tend to reduce marketing budget to improve their short term profitability. Gauging the value and accountability of marketing spending is therefore considered as a major research priority in marketing. To respond this call, recent studies have documented that financial market reacts positively to a firm’s marketing activity or marketing related outcomes such as brand equity and customer satisfaction. However, prior studies focus on the relation of marketing variable and financial market variables. This study suggests a channel about how marketing activity increases firm valuation. Specifically, we propose that a firm’s marketing activity increases the level of the firm’s product market information and thereby the dispersion in financial analysts’ earnings forecasts decreases. With less uncertainty about the firm’s future prospect, the firm’s managers and shareholders have less information asymmetry, which reduces the firm’s cost of capital and thereby increases the valuation of the firm. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to examine how informational benefits can mediate the effect of marketing activity on firm value. To test whether marketing activity contributes to increase in firm value by mitigating information asymmetry, this study employs a longitudinal data which contains 12,824 firm-year observations with 2,337 distinct firms from 1981 to 2006. Firm value is measured by Tobin’s Q and one-year-ahead buy-and-hold abnormal return (BHAR). Following prior literature, dispersion in analysts’ earnings forecasts is used as a proxy for the information gap between management and shareholders. For model specification, to identify mediating effect, the three-step regression approach is adopted. All models are estimated using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods to test the statistical significance of the mediating effect. The analysis shows that marketing intensity has a significant negative relationship with dispersion in analysts’ earnings forecasts. After including the mediator variable about analyst dispersion, the effect of marketing intensity on firm value drops from 1.199 (p < .01) to 1.130 (p < .01) in Tobin’s Q model and the same effect drops from .192 (p < .01) to .188 (p < .01) in BHAR model. The results suggest that analysts’ forecast dispersion partially accounts for the positive effect of marketing on firm valuation. Additionally, the same analysis was conducted with an alternative dependent variable (forecast accuracy) and a marketing metric (advertising intensity). The analysis supports the robustness of the main results. In sum, the results provide empirical evidence that marketing activity can increase shareholder value by mitigating problem of information asymmetry in the capital market. The findings have important implications for managers. First, managers should be cognizant of the role of marketing activity in providing information to the financial market as well as to the consumer market. Thus, managers should take into account investors’ reaction when they design marketing communication messages for reducing the cost of capital. Second, this study shows a channel on how marketing creates shareholder value and highlights the accountability of marketing. In addition to the direct impact of marketing on firm value, an indirect channel by reducing information asymmetry should be considered. Potentially, marketing managers can justify their spending from the perspective of increasing long-term shareholder value.
Abstract
As advertising and promotions are categorized as operating expenses, managers tend to reduce marketing budget to improve their short term profitability. Gauging the value and accountability of marketing spending is therefore considered as a major research priority in marketing. To respond this call, recent studies have documented that financial market reacts positively to a firm’s marketing activity or marketing related outcomes such as brand equity and customer satisfaction. However, prior studies focus on the relation of marketing variable and financial market variables. This study suggests a channel about how marketing activity increases firm valuation. Specifically, we propose that a firm’s marketing activity increases the level of the firm’s product market information and thereby the dispersion in financial analysts’ earnings forecasts decreases. With less uncertainty about the firm’s future prospect, the firm’s managers and shareholders have less information asymmetry, which reduces the firm’s cost of capital and thereby increases the valuation of the firm. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to examine how informational benefits can mediate the effect of marketing activity on firm value. To test whether marketing activity contributes to increase in firm value by mitigating information asymmetry, this study employs a longitudinal data which contains 12,824 firm-year observations with 2,337 distinct firms from 1981 to 2006. Firm value is measured by Tobin’s Q and one-year-ahead buy-and-hold abnormal return (BHAR). Following prior literature, dispersion in analysts’ earnings forecasts is used as a proxy for the information gap between management and shareholders. For model specification, to identify mediating effect, the three-step regression approach is adopted. All models are estimated using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods to test the statistical significance of the mediating effect. The analysis shows that marketing intensity has a significant negative relationship with dispersion in analysts’ earnings forecasts. After including the mediator variable about analyst dispersion, the effect of marketing intensity on firm value drops from 1.199 (p < .01) to 1.130 (p < .01) in Tobin’s Q model and the same effect drops from .192 (p < .01) to .188 (p < .01) in BHAR model. The results suggest that analysts’ forecast dispersion partially accounts for the positive effect of marketing on firm valuation. Additionally, the same analysis was conducted with an alternative dependent variable (forecast accuracy) and a marketing metric (advertising intensity). The analysis supports the robustness of the main results. In sum, the results provide empirical evidence that marketing activity can increase shareholder value by mitigating problem of information asymmetry in the capital market. The findings have important implications for managers. First, managers should be cognizant of the role of marketing activity in providing information to the financial market as well as to the consumer market. Thus, managers should take into account investors’ reaction when they design marketing communication messages for reducing the cost of capital. Second, this study shows a channel on how marketing creates shareholder value and highlights the accountability of marketing. In addition to the direct impact of marketing on firm value, an indirect channel by reducing information asymmetry should be considered. Potentially, marketing managers can justify their spending from the perspective of increasing long-term shareholder value.
참고문헌 (37)
- Alford, Andrew W., "A Simultaneous Equations Analysis of Forecast Accuracy Analyst Following, and Trading Volume", Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance, 14, pp.219~224 (1999)
- Anderson, Eugene W., "Customer Satisfaction and Shareholder Value", Journal of Marketing, 68, pp.172~185 (2004)
- Atiase, Rowland K., "Predisclosure Information, Firm Capitalization, and Security Earnings Announcements", Journal of Accounting Research, 23, pp.21~36 (1985)
- Baron, Reuben M., "The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp.1173~1182 (1986)
- Barry, Christopher B., "Differential Information and Se curity Market Equilibrium", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20, pp.407~422 (1985)
- Barth, Mary E., "Brand Values and Capital Market Valuation", Review of Accounting Studies, 3(1-2), pp.41~68 (1998)
- Bharadwaj, Anandhi S., "Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin’s q", Management Science, 45, pp.1008~1024 (1999)
- Chauvin, Keith W., "Advertising, R&D Expenditures, and the Market Value of the Firm", Financial Management, 22(Winter), pp.128~114 (1993)
- Diether, Karl B., "Differences of Opinion and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns", Journal of Finance, 57, pp.2113~2141 (2002)
- Erickson, Gary, "Gaining Comparative Advantage Through Discretionary Expenditures: The Returns to R&D and Advertising", Management Science, 38(9), pp.1264~1279 (1992)
- Fama, Eugene F., "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work", Journal of Finance, 25(2), pp.383~417 (1970)
- Fang, Lily, "Media Coverage and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns", Journal of Finance, 64(5), pp.2023~2052 (2009)
- Fornell, Claes, "Customer Satisfaction and Stock Prices: High Returns, Low Risk", Journal of Marketing, 70, pp.3~14 (2006)
- Jacobson, Robert, "The Financial Markets and Customer Satisfaction: Re-examining Possible Financial Market Mispricing of Customer Satisfaction", Marketing Science, 28(5), pp.810~819 (2009)
- Joshi, Amit, "The Direct and Indirect Effects of Advertising Spending on Firm Value", Journal of Marketing, 74, pp.20~33 (2010)
- Karamanou, Irene, "The association between corporate boards, audit committees, and management earnings forecasts: An empirical analysis", Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2), pp.453~486 (2005)
- Lang, M., "Corporate Disclosure Policy and Analyst Behavior", Accounting Review, 71, pp.467~492 (1996)
- Luo, Xueming, "When Marketing Strategy First Meets Wall Street: Marketing Spendings and Firms’ Initial Public Offerings", Journal of Marketing, 72, pp.98~109 (2008)
- Luo, Xueming, "Incentivizing CEOs to Build Customer-and Employee-Firm Relations for Higher Customer Satisfaction and Firm Value", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(6), pp.745~758 (2012)
- Lyon, John, "Improved Methods for Tests of Long-Run Abnormal Stock Returns", Journal of Finance, 54(1), pp.165~201 (1999)
- Merton, Robert C., "A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information", Journal of Finance, 42(3), pp.483~510 (1987)
- Milgrom, Paul, "Relying on the Information of Interested Parties", Rand Journal of Economics, 17(1), pp.18~32 (1986)
- Mittal, Vikas, "Dual Emphasis and the Long-Term Financial Impact of Customer Satisfaction", Marketing Science, 24(4), pp.544~555 (2005)
- Mizik, Natalie, "Trading Off Between Value Creation and Value Appropriation: The Financial Implications of Shifts in Strategic Emphasis", Journal of Marketing, 67, pp.63~76 (2003)
- Mizik, Natalie, "Myopic Marketing Management: The Phenomenon and Its Long-term Impact on Firm Value", Marketing Science, 26(3), pp.361~379 (2007)
- Mizik, Natalie, "The Financial Value Impact of Perceptual Brand Attributes", Journal of Marketing Research, 45, pp.15~32 (2008)
- Mizik, Natalie, "Valuing Branded Business", Journal of Marketing, 73, pp.137~153 (2009)
- Myers, Stewart C., "Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have", Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), pp.187~221 (1984)
- Nelson, Philip, "Advertising as Information", Journal of Political Economy, 82(4), pp.729~754 (1974)
- Newey, Whitney K., "A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix", Econometrica, 55, pp.703~708 (1987)
- Rao, Vithala, "How Is Manifest Branding Strategy Related to the Intangible Value of a Corporation?", Journal of Marketing, 68(4), pp.126~141 (2004)
- Rust, Roland T., "Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future Directions", Journal of Marketing, 68, pp.76~89 (2004)
- Smith, Clifford W. Jr., "The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies", Journal of Financial Economics, 3, pp.263~292 (1992)
- Srinivasan, Shuba, "Marketing and Firm Value: Metrics, Methods, Findings, and Future Direc tions", Journal of Marketing Research, 46, pp.293~312 (2009)
- Thomas, Shawn, "Firm Diversification and Asymmetric Information: Evidence from Analysts’ Forecast and Earning Announcements", Journal of Financial Economics, 64, pp.373~396 (2002)
- Yi, Youjae, "The Dynamic Effects of Customer Satisfaction on Firm’s Profitability and Value", 아시아마케팅저널, 2(2), pp.105~112 (2008), 한국마케팅학회
- Zhang, Jie, "Sales Effects of Attention to Feature Advertisements: A Bayesian Mediation Analysis", Journal of Marketing Research, 46(5), pp.669~681 (2009)