SNS Effect of the negative event on the Firm Performance: Comparison between Pre and Post SNS media appearance
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
When the negative event is published, the company tends to go through the negative impact on the firm performance. Especially, with the SNS, the negative event is instantly spread on indefinite region so the impact seems bigger than the period before the SNS media appearance. It seems that everyone considers the SNS media impact on the firm performance quite big. However, there has been no empirical study on the impact comparison on the firm performance between pre and post SNS media occurrence periods. This study tries to empirically compare the impact of the negative event on the firm performance between pre and post SNS media appearance. Our study starts from the basic but not verified question; Does really the negative event have more negative impact in the post-SNS-occurrence period than in the pre-SNS-occurrence period?In order to examine the impact of the negative publicity on firm performance in two eras, pre and post SNS media appearance, we used CAR (Cumulative Abnormal Resturns) model. By using this model, we could verify the statistical significance of cumulative abnormal returns in market between before and after the events. For event samples, we focused on food manufacturers and collected the negative events from 1991 to 2003 for pre-SNS occurrence period, and from 2010 to 2013 for post- SNS occurrence period. Based on the listed food companies at KOSPI, we researched Naver News Library (newslibrary.naver.com) and Naver News (news.naver.com) for all the individual negative events published for both periods. Firm returns data were collected from TS 2000 (KOCO Info) and market portfolio data were collected from KRX Exchange. Through our empirical analysis, our finding is interesting to note that the type of events differently influences on the firm performance. With the SNS, the health-related events have influence on the firm performance ‘after the event day’ whereas the company behavior trust events have influence ‘before the event day’. Our findings have implications for management. When a negative event directly related to or threatening customers or their life such as health, it is crucial to fix up the situation right after the event occurs. On the other hand, when a negative event is not publicly available information such as company behavior trust, it is important for marketers to strengthen the firms’ trust reputation and control the bad WOM before the event.
Abstract
When the negative event is published, the company tends to go through the negative impact on the firm performance. Especially, with the SNS, the negative event is instantly spread on indefinite region so the impact seems bigger than the period before the SNS media appearance. It seems that everyone considers the SNS media impact on the firm performance quite big. However, there has been no empirical study on the impact comparison on the firm performance between pre and post SNS media occurrence periods. This study tries to empirically compare the impact of the negative event on the firm performance between pre and post SNS media appearance. Our study starts from the basic but not verified question; Does really the negative event have more negative impact in the post-SNS-occurrence period than in the pre-SNS-occurrence period?In order to examine the impact of the negative publicity on firm performance in two eras, pre and post SNS media appearance, we used CAR (Cumulative Abnormal Resturns) model. By using this model, we could verify the statistical significance of cumulative abnormal returns in market between before and after the events. For event samples, we focused on food manufacturers and collected the negative events from 1991 to 2003 for pre-SNS occurrence period, and from 2010 to 2013 for post- SNS occurrence period. Based on the listed food companies at KOSPI, we researched Naver News Library (newslibrary.naver.com) and Naver News (news.naver.com) for all the individual negative events published for both periods. Firm returns data were collected from TS 2000 (KOCO Info) and market portfolio data were collected from KRX Exchange. Through our empirical analysis, our finding is interesting to note that the type of events differently influences on the firm performance. With the SNS, the health-related events have influence on the firm performance ‘after the event day’ whereas the company behavior trust events have influence ‘before the event day’. Our findings have implications for management. When a negative event directly related to or threatening customers or their life such as health, it is crucial to fix up the situation right after the event occurs. On the other hand, when a negative event is not publicly available information such as company behavior trust, it is important for marketers to strengthen the firms’ trust reputation and control the bad WOM before the event.
참고문헌 (22)
- Austin, Bruce, "Critics’ and Consumers’ Evaluations of Motion Pictures: A Longitudinal Test of the Taste Culture and Elitist Hypotheses", Journal of Popular Film and Television, 10(4), pp.156~167 (1983)
- Basuroy, Suman, "How Critical are Critical Reviews? the Box Office Effects of Film Critics, Star Power, and Budgets", Journal of Marketing, pp.103~117 (2003)
- "Business Week, July 10 (2000)", ~ (2000)
- Cameron, Sam, "On the Role of Critics in the Culture Industry", Journal of Cultural Economics, 19(4), pp.321~331 (1995)
- Campbell, John Y., "Lo, and A. Craig Mackinlay, 1997, the Econometrics of Financial Markets", ~ (1997)
- Chevalier, Judith A., "The effect of word of mouth on sales:", Online book reviews, ~ (2003)
- Horsky, Dan, "Does it Pay to Change Your Company's Name? A Stock Market Perspective", Marketing Science, 6(4), pp.320~335 (1987)
- Ivković, Zoran, "The Timing and Value of Forecast and Recommendation Revisions", Journal of Financial Economics, 73(3), pp.433~463 (2004)
- Karlíček, Miroslav, "Word-of-Mouth Marketing: An Integrated Model", Ekonomika a Management (2010)
- "Korea Restaurant Information", ~ (2009)
- Lee, Dongwon, "Does Online Social Network Contribute to WOM Effect on Product Sales?", Korea Intelligent Information System Society 167~172 Spring Joint Meeting (2012)
- Liu, Yong, "Word of Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue", Journal of Marketing, pp.74~89 (2006)
- Luo, Xueming, "Customer Satisfaction, Analyst Stock Recommendations, and Firm Value", Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), pp.1041~1058 (2010)
- Stenger, Thomas, "Social Network Sites (SNS): Do they Match? Definitions and Methods for Social Sciences and Marketing Research", Sunbelt XXIX, Annual Conference of the INSNA (2009)
- Vogel, Harold L., "Entertainment Industry Economics: A Guide for Financial Analysis" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Walker, Chip, "Word of Mouth: Targeting Advice Givers can Unlock the Power of Positive Gossip for Your Business", American Demographics, 17, pp.38~ (1995)
- Womack, Kent L., "Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations have Investment Value?", The Journal of Finance, 51(1), pp.137~167 (1996)
- Kim Yoonsuk, "Interaction between Public Relations and Stock Price", 석사, pp.2008
- 김일석, "뉴미디어 시대의 바이럴 광고에 대한 고찰", 정보디자인학연구, 16(1), pp.71~80 (2013), 한국정보디자인학회
- Oh Seung Seok, "A Study on the Uses and Gratifications of Twitter and Facebook", 석사, pp.2010
- 이원흠, "내부상품거래 공시기업의 주가반응과 기업특성에 관한 실증연구", 재무관리연구, 30(2), pp.75~100 (2013), 한국재무관리학회
- Lee Tae Hee, "Effects of Corporate Identity Program on the Profit Performance of the Firm", ASIAMARKETING JOURNAL, 2(4), pp.68~78 (2000)
