본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Impact of Crisis Responsibility and Risk Perception on Communication Behavior Intention in SNS: Dual Processing Theory

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Social networking service(SNS) helps users manage, share and delivery a vast information as a communication tool. When users read crisis news in SNS, they communicate the information with others by considering not only their belief (i.e., cognitive risk perception) but also emotion (i.e., affective risk perception). However, few researches have been interested in the construct of communication behaviors of crisis in SNS. This study aimed to explore the role of risk perception (cognitive and affective risk perception) between crisis responsibility and communication behavior through dual processing theory. As a result of the empirical analysis, crisis responsibility had a positive effect on cognitive risk perception and affective risk perception. In addition, cognitive risk perception had no significant effect on communication behavior whereas affective risk perception had influence on communication behavior positively. Thus, our findings may predict that the affective risk perception through crisis responsibility is more potentially important to communication behavior such as sharing information rather than cognitive risk perception. The results give insightful ideas why marketer should reduce perceived emotion caused by risk to strengthen prospective SNS users understanding of communication behavior intention.

Abstract

Social networking service(SNS) helps users manage, share and delivery a vast information as a communication tool. When users read crisis news in SNS, they communicate the information with others by considering not only their belief (i.e., cognitive risk perception) but also emotion (i.e., affective risk perception). However, few researches have been interested in the construct of communication behaviors of crisis in SNS. This study aimed to explore the role of risk perception (cognitive and affective risk perception) between crisis responsibility and communication behavior through dual processing theory. As a result of the empirical analysis, crisis responsibility had a positive effect on cognitive risk perception and affective risk perception. In addition, cognitive risk perception had no significant effect on communication behavior whereas affective risk perception had influence on communication behavior positively. Thus, our findings may predict that the affective risk perception through crisis responsibility is more potentially important to communication behavior such as sharing information rather than cognitive risk perception. The results give insightful ideas why marketer should reduce perceived emotion caused by risk to strengthen prospective SNS users understanding of communication behavior intention.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Afifi, W. A., "Examining the Decision to Talk with Family about Organ Donation : Applying the Theory of Motivated Information Management", Communication Monographs, 73, pp.188~215 (2006)
  2. Benoit, W. L., "Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies : A Theory of Image Restoration" (1995), State University of New York Press
  3. Brashers, D. E., "Communication in the Management of Uncertainty: The Case of Persons Living with HIV or AIDS", Communication Monographs, 67, pp.63~84 (2000)
  4. Claeys, An-Sofie., "Restoring Reputations in Times of Crisis : An Experimental Study of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the Moderating Effects of Locus of Control", Public Relations Review, 36, pp.256~262 (2010)
  5. Coombs, W. T., "Choosing the Right Words : The Development of Guidelines for the Selection of the"Appropriate"Crisis Response Strategies", Management Communication Quarterly, 8, pp.447~476 (1995)
  6. Coombs, W. T., "Ongoing crisis communication : Planning, managing, and responding" (1999), Sage Publications
  7. Coombs, W. T., "Communication and Attributions in a Crisis : An Experimental Study in Crisis Communication", Journal of Public Relations Research, 8(4), pp.279~295 (1996)
  8. Coombs, W. T., "Helping Crisis Managers Protect Reputational Assets Initial Tests of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory", Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), pp.165~186 (2002)
  9. Coombs, W. T., "Mahwah, Responding to crisis: A Rhetorical Approach to Crisis Communication", pp.95~115 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  10. Coombs, W. T., "The Negative Communication Dynamic : Exploring the Impact of Stakeholder Effect on Behavioral Intentions", Journal of Communication Management, 11(4), pp.300~312 (2007)
  11. Epstein, S., "Integration of the Cognitive and the Psychodynamics Unconscious", American Psychologist, 49, pp.709~724 (1994)
  12. Fornell, C., "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39~50 (1981)
  13. Grunig, J. E., "The Message-attitude behavior Relationship : Communication Behaviors of Organizations", Communication Research, 9(2), pp.163~200 (1982)
  14. Grunig, J. E., "Managing Public Relations" (1984), Holt, Rinehartand Winston
  15. Hair, J. F., "Multivariate Data Analysis with" (1995), Prentice Hall
  16. Hilary, F. S., "Through the Looking Glass : A Decade of Red Cross Crisis Response and Situational Crisis Communication Theory", Public Relations Review, 36, pp.21~27 (2010)
  17. Ivancevich, J. M., "Organizational Behavior & Management" (1993), Richard D. Irwin, Inc
  18. Kahlor, L., "Seeking and Processing Information about Impersonal Risk", Science Communication, 28(2), pp.163~194 (2006)
  19. 김인숙, "원자력에 대한 위험인식과 지각된 지식, 커뮤니케이션 채널의 이용, 제 3자 효과가 낙관적 편견에 미치는 영향 ― 일본 후쿠시마 원전사고를 중심으로", 언론과학연구, 12(3), pp.79~106 (2012), 한국지역언론학회
  20. Kim, J-N., "Problem Solving and Communicative Action : A Situational Theory of Problem Solving", Journal of Communication, 61(1), pp.120~149 (2011)
  21. 김윤진, "기업의 사전 명성과 위기 커뮤니케이션 전략이 위기 발생 후 명성과 위기인식에 미치는 효과 연구", PR연구, 15(2), pp.5~39 (2011), 한국PR학회[DOI]
  22. Lee, Betty Caman, "Audience-oriented Approach to Crisis Communication : A Study of Hong Kong Consumers’ Evaluation of an Organizational Crisis", Communication Research, 31(5), pp.600~618 (2004)
  23. 이상경, "기업의 제품 관련 위기 유형과 대응 전략별 효과에 관한 연구", 한국광고홍보학보, 9(3), pp.186~218 (2007), 한국광고홍보학회
  24. 박은혜, "언론 프레이밍과 이미지회복전략이 공중의 위기 인식에 미치는 영향", 한국언론정보학보, 38(2), pp.73~118 (2007), 한국언론정보학회
  25. Raban, D. R., "Investigating Ownership and the Willingness to Share Information Online", Computers in Human Behavior, 23, pp.2367~2382 (2007)
  26. Slovic, Paul, "Risk Perception and Affect", Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), pp.322~325 (2006)
  27. Ulmer, R. R., "Post-crisis Communication and Renewal : Expanding the Parameters of Post-crisis Discourse", Public Relations Review, 33(2), pp.130~134 (2007)
  28. Weiner, B., "An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion", Psychological review, 92(4), pp.548~573 (1985)
  29. Weinstein, N. D., "Unrealistic Optimism about Future Life Events", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, pp.30~53 (1980)
  30. Wilson, T. D., "Information Behaviour : An Interdisciplinary Perspective", Information Processing and Management, 33(4), pp.551~572 (1997)
  31. Wimmer, R. D., "Mass Media Research: An Introduction" (1994), Wadsworth
  32. 윤영민, "사과 포함 여부가 책임귀인과 위기 커뮤니케이션 전략 수용에 미치는 영향 : 방어적 사과 전략의 효용성 탐구", 한국언론학보, 52(5), pp.207~226 (2008), 한국언론학회
  33. Zajonc, R. B., "Feeling and Thinking : Preferences Need No Inferences", American Psychologist, 35, pp.151~175 (1980)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)