본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Impact of Privacy Control on Users' Intention to Use Smart Home Internet of Things (IoT) Services

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Despite the diverse benefits of smart home Internet of Things (IoT) services, the biggest obstacle to the actual usage of those services is concern about privacy. However, little research has investigated the impact of privacy control on users' intention to use smart home services. Based on communication privacy management theory and privacy calculus theory, this study investigates how privacy control options affect users' perceived benefits and costs and how those perceptions affect individuals’ intentions to use smart home services by conducting an experiment. Our results showed that smart home privacy control options decreased perceived benefits and increased perceived costs. The perceived benefits and costs significantly affected the intention to use smart home security services. More intriguingly, the effect of perceived benefit was found to be stronger than that of the expected cost. This research contributes to the field of IoT and smart home research and provides practitioners with notable guidelines.

Abstract

Despite the diverse benefits of smart home Internet of Things (IoT) services, the biggest obstacle to the actual usage of those services is concern about privacy. However, little research has investigated the impact of privacy control on users' intention to use smart home services. Based on communication privacy management theory and privacy calculus theory, this study investigates how privacy control options affect users' perceived benefits and costs and how those perceptions affect individuals’ intentions to use smart home services by conducting an experiment. Our results showed that smart home privacy control options decreased perceived benefits and increased perceived costs. The perceived benefits and costs significantly affected the intention to use smart home security services. More intriguingly, the effect of perceived benefit was found to be stronger than that of the expected cost. This research contributes to the field of IoT and smart home research and provides practitioners with notable guidelines.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Acquisti, Alessandro, "Privacy and rationality in individual decision making", IEEE Security &Privacy, 3(1), pp.26~33 (2005)
  2. Adomavicius, Gediminas, "Personalization technologies : A process-oriented perspective", Communications of the ACM, 48(10), pp.83~90 (2005)
  3. Awad, Naveen Farag, "The personalization privacy paradox : an empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to Be profiled online for personalization", MIS Quarterly, 30(1), pp.13~28 (2006)
  4. Balaji, M. S., "Determinants of negative word-of-mouth communication using social networking sites", Information & Management, 53(4), pp.528~540 (2016)
  5. Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye, "Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes", Energy Policy, 63, pp.363~374 (2013)
  6. Chen, Pei-Yu, "Can vendors influence switching costs and compatibility in an environment with open standards?", MIS Quarterly, pp.541~562 (2006)
  7. Choi, Sujeong, "The flipside of ubiquitous connectivity enabled by smartphone-based social networking service: Social presence and privacy concern", Computers in Human Behavior, 65, pp.325~333 (2016)
  8. Chun, Heasun, "The integrated model of smartphone adoption : Hedonic and utilitarian value perceptions of smartphones among Korean college students", Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(9), pp.473~479 (2012)
  9. Culnan, Mary J., "Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust : An empirical investigation", Organization Science, 10(1), pp.104~115 (1999)
  10. Demiris, George, "Technologies for an aging society : A systematic review of"smart home"applications", Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 17(1), pp.33~40 (2008)
  11. Dinev, Tamara, "An extended privacy calculus model for E-commerce transactions", Information Systems Research, 17(1), pp.61~80 (2006)
  12. Ding, Ding, "Built environment, physical activity, and obesity: What have we learned from reviewing the literature?", Health & Place, 18(1), pp.100~105 (2012)
  13. Farooq, M. Umar, "A review on Internet of Things(IoT)", International Journal of Computer Applications, 113(1), pp.1~7 (2015)
  14. Featherman, Mauricio S., "Predicting Eservices adoption : A perceived risk facets perspective", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), pp.451~474 (2003)
  15. Gutierrez, Anabel, "Using privacy calculus theory to explore entrepreneurial directions in mobile location-based advertising: Identifying intrusiveness as the critical risk factor", Computers in Human Behavior, 95, pp.295~306 (2019)
  16. Hair, Joe F., "PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet", Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), pp.139~152 (2011)
  17. 한상린, "Effects of Technology Readiness on User Perceptions and Use Intention of Mobile Social Commerce", 아시아마케팅저널, 18(2), pp.25~44 (2016), 한국마케팅학회
  18. Jeong, Kyeong-Ah, "Smart home design and operation preferences of Americans and Koreans", Ergonomics, 53(5), pp.636~660 (2010)
  19. Ji, Pan, "Am I safe? Exploring relationships between primary territories and online privacy", Journal of Internet Commerce, 9(1), pp.3~22 (2010)
  20. Jozani, Mohsen, "Privacy concerns and benefits of engagementwith socialmedia-enabled apps : Aprivacy calculus perspective", Computers in Human Behavior, 107, pp.106~260 (2020)
  21. 김지윤, "The Effect of Perceived Risk, Hedonic Value, and Self-Construal on Attitude toward Mobile SNS", 아시아마케팅저널, 16(1), pp.149~168 (2014), 한국마케팅학회
  22. Kim, Dongyeon, "Willingness to provide personal information:Perspective of privacy calculus in IoT services", Computers in Human Behavior, 92, pp.273~281 (2019)
  23. Lee, Yong-Ki, J, "A unified perspective on the factors influencing usage intention toward mobile financial services", Journal of Business Research, 65(11), pp.1590~1599 (2012)
  24. Lee, Haein, "Why do people share their context information on social network services? A qualitative study and an experimental study on users'behavior of balancing perceived benefit and risk", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(9), pp.862~877 (2013)
  25. Li, Yuan, "Theories in online information privacy research : A critical review and an integrated framework", Decision Support Systems, 54(1), pp.471~481 (2012)
  26. Li, Han, "The role of affect and cognition on online consumers' decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors", Decision Support Systems, 51(3), pp.434~445 (2011)
  27. Marikyan, Davit, "A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, pp.139~154 (2019)
  28. McNealy, Jasmine, "Tea and turbulence : Communication privacy management theory and online celebrity gossip forums", Computers in Human Behavior, 92, pp.110~118 (2019)
  29. Nepomuceno, Marcelo Vinhal, "How to reduce perceived risk when buying online : The interactions between intangibility, product knowledge, brand familiarity, privacy and security concerns", Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(4), pp.619~629 (2014)
  30. 오윤경, "What Improves Customer Satisfaction in Mobile Banking Apps? An Application of Text Mining Analysis", 아시아마케팅저널, 23(4), pp.28~37 (2022), 한국마케팅학회
  31. Omarzu, Julia, "A disclosure decision model : Determining how and when individuals will self-disclose", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), pp.174~185 (2000)
  32. Petronio, Sandra, "Communication privacy management theory: What do we know about family privacy regulation?", Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(3), pp.175~196 (2010)
  33. Pi, Shih-Ming, "The effects of user perception of value on use of blog services", Social Behavior and Personality : International Journal, 38(8), pp.1029~1040 (2010)
  34. Eva-Maria, Schomakers, "Users' preferences for smart home automatione investigating aspects of privacy and trust", Telematics and Informatics, 64, pp.101689~ (2021)
  35. Sharma, Shwadhin, "Disclosing too much? situational factors affecting information disclosure in social commerce environment", Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 13(5), pp.305~319 (2014)
  36. 김봉희, "대 한국 미·일 직접투자의 특성 변화", 경영연구, 28(4), pp.225~246 (2013), 한국산업경영학회[DOI]
  37. Shih, Dong-Her, "Exploring the individual's behavior on selfdisclosure online", International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(10), pp.627~645 (2012)
  38. Shmargad, Yotam, "When online visibility deters social interaction: The case of digital gifts", Journal of Interactive Marketing, 36, pp.1~14 (2016)
  39. Smart home report 2021. Statista digital market outlook - market report, "Statista", ~ (2021)
  40. Tojib, Dewi, "Post-adoption modeling of advanced mobile service use", Journal of Business Research, 65(7), pp.922~928 (2012)
  41. "IoT connected devices worldwide 2030" (2021)[URL]
  42. Wang, Tien, "Intention to disclose personal information via mobile applications:A privacy calculus perspective", International Journal of Information Management, 36(4), pp.531~542 (2016)
  43. "Internet of Things survey results:IoT adoption is already significant" (2015)[URL]
  44. Wooten, David B., "Qualitative steps toward an expanded model of anxiety in gift-giving", Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), pp.84~95 (2000)
  45. Xu, Heng, "The personalization privacy paradox : An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing", Decision Support Systems, 51(1), pp.42~52 (2011)
  46. Xu, Heng, "The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus:The case of location-based services", Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), pp.135~174 (2009)
  47. Zhao, Ling, "Disclosure intention of location-related information in location-based social network services", International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(4), pp.53~90 (2012)
  48. Zheng, Serena, "User perceptions of smart home IoT privacy", Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2, pp.1~20 (2018), CSCW

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)