부동산시장의 투명성에 관한 연구 -JLL의 국제부동산투명성지수를 중심으로-
A Research on Transparency in the Real Estate Market: Jones Lang LaSalle's GRETI (Global Real Estate Transparency Index)
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is within bounds to say that today transparency is becoming the conversation topic of all the fields. The real estate market is not exception. Many countries realized the importance of transparency in the real estate market and have made efforts to improve transparency. So, transparency has became greater for recent years. The extent of transparency is remaining considerably stable. The following two things are prerequisites for the improvement of transparency in the real estate market. One is to define the concept transparency. The other is to establish standards and elements for judging transparency. We cannot examine the improvement of transparency and its plan as well as the judgement of transparency until we establish the definition of this concept. This research has a significance of putting questions having a critical mind about the above things. This research aimed to examine the concept and criteria of transparency in the real estate market and suggest the task and plan for improving the real estate market in Korea, based on Jones Lang LaSalle's GRETI (global real estate transparency index). The price reporting system in real estate transaction and the public notification system of real estate register can be judged to have achieved an epoch-making improvement of transparency, on the grounds of transparency in real estate transaction and a yardstick of judgment of transparency (i.e. the basic structure of the real estate market). Non-activation of real estate securitization, in particular REITs (real estate investment trusts), is a factor of not enabling Korea's real estate market to obtain a good grade in the evaluation of transparency. The real estate market in Korea lacks information of commercial real estate (e.g. monthly rent in shopping districts, etc.). Further, all sorts of statistical data about general real estate are not satisfactory.
Abstract
It is within bounds to say that today transparency is becoming the conversation topic of all the fields. The real estate market is not exception. Many countries realized the importance of transparency in the real estate market and have made efforts to improve transparency. So, transparency has became greater for recent years. The extent of transparency is remaining considerably stable. The following two things are prerequisites for the improvement of transparency in the real estate market. One is to define the concept transparency. The other is to establish standards and elements for judging transparency. We cannot examine the improvement of transparency and its plan as well as the judgement of transparency until we establish the definition of this concept. This research has a significance of putting questions having a critical mind about the above things. This research aimed to examine the concept and criteria of transparency in the real estate market and suggest the task and plan for improving the real estate market in Korea, based on Jones Lang LaSalle's GRETI (global real estate transparency index). The price reporting system in real estate transaction and the public notification system of real estate register can be judged to have achieved an epoch-making improvement of transparency, on the grounds of transparency in real estate transaction and a yardstick of judgment of transparency (i.e. the basic structure of the real estate market). Non-activation of real estate securitization, in particular REITs (real estate investment trusts), is a factor of not enabling Korea's real estate market to obtain a good grade in the evaluation of transparency. The real estate market in Korea lacks information of commercial real estate (e.g. monthly rent in shopping districts, etc.). Further, all sorts of statistical data about general real estate are not satisfactory.
참고문헌 (16)
- 부동산거래질서 확립 및 투명성확보방안 연구, "건설교통부", ~ (2003)
- 민간투자사업관리법제 개선방안에 관한 연구(Ⅱ); 공공성과 투명성제고를 중심으로, "김성수", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2009)
- 박헌준, "기업 투명성과 기업 가치", 경영학연구, 35(5), pp.1361~1391 (2006), 한국경영학회
- 신열, "국제투명성기구(TI)의 부패인식지수(CPI) 분석에 따른 대응과제", 감사논집, 통권 : 13, pp.79~105 (2009), 감사원
- 조세투명성의 요건 및 지침에 관한 연구, "심충진", 한국조세연구원, ~ (2008)
- 손경환, "부동산시장의 투명성제고를 위한 정책방향", 도시문제, 40(444), pp.56~65 (2005), 대한지방행정공제회
- 윤세헌, "기업투명성과 자기자본비용", 박사, pp.2009
- 워렌 베니스, "투명성의 시대: 미래기업의 절대 조건" (2008), 웅진씽크빅
- 전연규, "주택재개발・재건축 분야 투명성 제고를 위한 제도개선 방안(국가청렴위원회 2006. 12월의 소개)", 도시개발, 통권 : 10, pp.4~19 (2007), 한국도시개발연구포럼
- 기획재정부, "IMF의 재정투명성 평가결과 및 개선계획", 기획재정부 보도자료, ~ (2001)
- 藤井建, "不動産投資市場の發展と新たな市場政策", 不動産調査月報, (346), pp.1~13 (2007), 日本不動産硏究所
- IMF, "Manual on Fiscal Transparency", ~ (1999)
- Jones Lang LaSalle, "Global Real Estate Transparency Index 2004" (2004), Jones Lang LaSalle
- Jones Lang LaSalle, "Transparency Improves Around the World, in Real Estate Transparency Index 2006" (2006), Jones Lang LaSalle
- Jones Lang LaSalle, "From opacity to Transparency, in Real Estate Transparency Index: Global Foresight Series 2008" (2008), Jones Lang LaSalle
- Jones Lang LaSalle, "Mapping the world of transparency: Uncertainty and risk in real estate, in Real Estate Transparency Index: Global Foresight Series 2010" (2010), Jones Lang LaSalle
