주택금융규제가 비은행권 주택담보대출에 미치는 영향
The Effect of Housing Finance Regulation on Mortgage Loan of Non-banking Sector
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The government financial authorities are expected to tighten housing finance regulations in the future in order to control household debt. However, the purpose of mortgage lending is not only to provide residential housing, but also to provide funds for business and living expenses. Therefore,there is a possibility that demand for loans between banking sector and non-banking sector will move. In this context, this study empirically analyzed the balloon effects of regulatory arbitrage between banking sector and non-banking sector. The results of the analysis are as follows. First, the strengthening of housing finance regulationshowed that the proportion of non-bank mortgage loan amount and weight increased, and the totalmortgage loans amount of depositary institutions increased. In addition, the strengthening of thehousing finance regulations led to an increase in the proportion of non-banking mortgage loansamong all depositary institutions, as well as a decline in collateral value, thereby inducing a rise inthe lending rate. Excessive regulation on housing finance is likely to increase the burden on borrowers to repaytheir loans. Therefore, Consistent policies for all financial institutions can prevent the balloon effectof mortgages.
Abstract
The government financial authorities are expected to tighten housing finance regulations in the future in order to control household debt. However, the purpose of mortgage lending is not only to provide residential housing, but also to provide funds for business and living expenses. Therefore,there is a possibility that demand for loans between banking sector and non-banking sector will move. In this context, this study empirically analyzed the balloon effects of regulatory arbitrage between banking sector and non-banking sector. The results of the analysis are as follows. First, the strengthening of housing finance regulationshowed that the proportion of non-bank mortgage loan amount and weight increased, and the totalmortgage loans amount of depositary institutions increased. In addition, the strengthening of thehousing finance regulations led to an increase in the proportion of non-banking mortgage loansamong all depositary institutions, as well as a decline in collateral value, thereby inducing a rise inthe lending rate. Excessive regulation on housing finance is likely to increase the burden on borrowers to repaytheir loans. Therefore, Consistent policies for all financial institutions can prevent the balloon effectof mortgages.
참고문헌 (27)
- 고성수, "주택금융규제가 소득분위별 주택소비에 미치는 영향", 부동산학연구, 14(2), pp.57~74 (2008), 한국부동산분석학회
- 김영철, "장기주택금융의 차용제약이 가구의 주택소비에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 국토계획, 39(1), pp.223~233 (2004), 대한국토·도시계획학회
- 김정렬, "가계부채 규모와 연체율 결정요인에 관한 연구", 한일경상논집, 66, pp.25~46 (2015), 한일경상학회
- 박종상, "주택담보대출 리스크 관리를 위한 규제 및 대출상품의 설계", pp.209~271 (2017), 한국금융연구원
- 송인호, "LTV 규제가 거시경제에 미치는 영향", KDI 경제전망, 31(1), pp.73~80 (2014), 한국개발연구원
- 심종원, "주택담보대출 연체율 결정 요인에 관한 연구", 부동산학연구, 15(2), pp.81~96 (2009), 한국부동산분석학회
- 이규복, "비은행 금융회사 금리 결정요인 분석 : 저축은행 및 캐피탈사를 중심으로" (2011), 한국금융연구원
- 이동규, "주택정책 규제수단으로서 DTI 규제정책의 효과 분석: System Dynamics를 활용한 시뮬레이션 분석", 한국정책학회보, 18(4), pp.207~241 (2009), 한국정책학회
- 이소영, "총부채상환비율 규제가 주택점유형태 결정에 미치는 영향 분석", 서울도시연구, 11(1), pp.83~101 (2010), 서울연구원[DOI]
- 이종원, "계량경제학" (2007), 박영사
- 이호진, "주택금융규제가 주택소비 및 금융시장 안정성에 미치는 영향", 박사, pp.2018
- 임대봉, "주택시장의 대출규제(LTV․DTI)와 주택가격, 그리고 가계부채에 관한 연구", 국토계획, 48(3), pp.361~381 (2013), 대한국토·도시계획학회
- 임진, "주택담보대출 리스크 관리를 위한 규제 및 대출 상품의 설계", pp.155~207 (2017), 한국금융연구원
- 조만, "부동산금융의 현황과 과제", pp.70~101 (2012), 한국개발연구원
- 최막중, "주택금융의 활성화가 가구의 주택수요에미치는 영향", 국토계획, 36(7), pp.113~138 (2001), 대한국토ㆍ도시계획학회
- 최성호, "LTV, DTI 규제완화가 주택구매여력 및 리스크에 미치는 영향", 금융정보연구, 4(1), pp.27~52 (2015), 한국금융정보학회
- 2016년 하반기 금융안정보고서, "한국은행", ~ (2016)
- 통계청, "2016년 가계금융ㆍ복지조사 결과｣", ~ (2016)
- Campbell, John Y., "How do house prices affect consumption? Evidence from micro data", Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(3), pp.591~621 (2007)
- Dynan, Karen E., "The Rise in U.S. Household Indebtedness: Causes and consequences", Paper Prepared for the Reserve Bank of Australia Conference (2007)
- Do Loan-to-Value and Debt-to-Income Limits Work? Evidence from Korea, "Igan, Deniz", IMF, ~, pp.IMF Working Paper , 11 (2011), 297
- 2016 Article ⅳ consultation—press release; staff report; and statement by the executive director for the republic of Korea, "IMF", IMF, ~, pp.IMF Country Report , No. 16 (2016), 278, 2016
- Linneman, P., "The Impact of Borrowing-Constraints on Homeownership", AREUEA Journal, 17(4), pp.389~402 (1989)
- When is Macroprudential Policy Effective?, "McDonald, Chris", ~, pp.Working Paper, no.496 (2015)
- Moffitt, R., "The Econometrics of Piecewise-Linear Budget Constraints", Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 4(3), pp.317~328 (1986)
- MacroprudentialPolicies and Housing Prices – A New Database and Empirical Evidence for Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe, "Vandenbussche, Jerome", ~, pp.IMF Working Paper 12 (2012), 303
- Zorn, P., "Mobility-Tenure Decisions and Financial Credit", AREUEA Journal, 17(4), pp.1~16 (1989)