Restorative JUSTICE and Community Sentence
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In recent, restorative justice has become a new paradigm for criminal justice in response to crime. In the existing criminal justice system, punishment is a legal consequence of crime, which has the nature to impose harm on the crime committed by the actor. On the other hand, restorative justice focuses on conflict parties to resolve conflicts. In this view of the world, the problem of crime is the wound of the community and the damage of the network. More fundamentally, this view of illicit behavior implies an interest in the healing of the affected parties, including the perpetrator and the community, as well as the victim. So the parties(the perpetrators, the victims, the community members, etc., in relation to the recovery) participate in the process of resolving conflicts and set and pursue the goal of restoring and reintegrating conflicts. The recovery of the perpetrator is also as important as the recovery of the victim, and it is necessary to accept the perpetrator as a member of the community again Therefore restorative justice emphasizes active support and involvement of the community in the process of recovery. From this point of view, we consider that social treatment is appropriate for the realization of ideology of restorative justice rather than treatment in facility at the correction stage, and we seek to utilize social treatment as restorative sanction by practice program of restorative justice. In this respect, the process of acknowledging responsibility for their actions and trying to heal the damage they have with them will lead to regret and responsibility for the past. In addition, you can expect the preventive effect, which is the purpose of punishment. On the other hand, "restorative justice differs from the existing criminal justice in that it pursues its goals and means, so many theorists of restorative justice have found that the restorative programs they want to practice are uncritically absorbed into the existing criminal justice system, the problem is that it is simply a solution to the problem-solving type of the problem by restoring the victim's damage to the victim. Therefore, in the aspect of recovery of the main keyword which is the center of restorative justice, the criminal apologizes for himself and takes a restorative duty, so that the result of his / I must start with. It should not be forgotten that in this process, the promise of restoration of the damage between the parties is the starting point for restoring the relationship, not the purpose of distressing the sufferer.
Abstract
In recent, restorative justice has become a new paradigm for criminal justice in response to crime. In the existing criminal justice system, punishment is a legal consequence of crime, which has the nature to impose harm on the crime committed by the actor. On the other hand, restorative justice focuses on conflict parties to resolve conflicts. In this view of the world, the problem of crime is the wound of the community and the damage of the network. More fundamentally, this view of illicit behavior implies an interest in the healing of the affected parties, including the perpetrator and the community, as well as the victim. So the parties(the perpetrators, the victims, the community members, etc., in relation to the recovery) participate in the process of resolving conflicts and set and pursue the goal of restoring and reintegrating conflicts. The recovery of the perpetrator is also as important as the recovery of the victim, and it is necessary to accept the perpetrator as a member of the community again Therefore restorative justice emphasizes active support and involvement of the community in the process of recovery. From this point of view, we consider that social treatment is appropriate for the realization of ideology of restorative justice rather than treatment in facility at the correction stage, and we seek to utilize social treatment as restorative sanction by practice program of restorative justice. In this respect, the process of acknowledging responsibility for their actions and trying to heal the damage they have with them will lead to regret and responsibility for the past. In addition, you can expect the preventive effect, which is the purpose of punishment. On the other hand, "restorative justice differs from the existing criminal justice in that it pursues its goals and means, so many theorists of restorative justice have found that the restorative programs they want to practice are uncritically absorbed into the existing criminal justice system, the problem is that it is simply a solution to the problem-solving type of the problem by restoring the victim's damage to the victim. Therefore, in the aspect of recovery of the main keyword which is the center of restorative justice, the criminal apologizes for himself and takes a restorative duty, so that the result of his / I must start with. It should not be forgotten that in this process, the promise of restoration of the damage between the parties is the starting point for restoring the relationship, not the purpose of distressing the sufferer.
참고문헌 (17)
- Howard Zehr, "The Little Book of Restorative Justice" (2002), Good
- Lee JK, "Stellenwert und Ausbau der Ambu-lanten Sanktionen", Korean Criminological Review, 58, pp.5~36 (2004)
- 한영수, "사회내제재의 실효성 확보방안에 관한 연구", 형사정책연구, 18(3), pp.441~466 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 배임호, "사회내 처우의 쟁점과 과제", 교정연구, 19, pp.191~218 (2003), 한국교정학회
- Tony F. Mashall, "Restorative Justice: An Overview", A Report by the Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate, 2(1), pp.5~33 (1999)
- Restorative Justice: An Overview, "Tony F Mashall", A Report by the Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate, ~ (1999)
- Choi SY, "Victim Assistance System in the United States", Korean Criminological Review, 35, pp.55~73 (1998)
- 이용식, "회복적 정의와 형사사법 정의 - 두 정의의 ‘절충’은 가능한 것인가?", 동아법학, (54), pp.417~448 (2012), 법학연구소
- Kim SD, "The Appropriateness of Criminal Sanctions and Restraint of Criminal Law", Korean Journal of Victimology, 5(1), pp.122~124 (1997)
- Walgrave, "Imposing Restoration Instead of Inflicting Pain: Reflection on the Judicial Reaction to Crime", pp.2003
- J Braithwaite, "Restorative Community Justice: Repairing Harm and Trans-forming Communities" (2001), Anderson
- 김용세, "형사제재시스템과 회복적 사법", 형사법연구, (23), pp.224~253 (2005), 한국형사법학회
- Lee HJ, "Penology and Prisoners' Constitutional Rights through Analysis of the Decisions of the Constitutional Court of Korea Sanction System", Journal of Criminal Law, 22, pp.343~373 (2004)
- Kim ZH, "Uplift Planning of the Community Service Order as Free-standing Sanction", The Law Reasearch Institutute of Hongik University, 12(1), pp.429~451 (2011)
- Song GS, "Criminology" (1998), Justinianus
- 2006 Community Service Order Enforcement Order Analysis, "Ministry of Justice", ~ (2007)
- 임안나, "교정복지 관점에서의 보호관찰제도에 관한 연구", 교정복지연구, (26), pp.83~106 (2012), 한국교정복지학회
