회복적 사법의 한계 극복 및 형사사법 정의와의 조화 - 소년사법을 중심으로 -
Overcoming limitations of Restorative Justice and Harmonizing with Criminal Justice — Focusing on Juvenile Justice —
3
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
If we look at the characteristics of recent school violence and juvenile crimes, there are many propensities to commit crimes to finance entertainment expenses, Internet games, and gambling, rather than crimes committed because of economically difficult family circumstances. It is being grouped and organized, verbal violence in cyberspace is also increasing, and the tendency to show off crime through SNS is greatly increasing. They seem to have no fear of crime at all, and they seem to lack social skills as well as empathy and conflict resolution skills. It would be said that existing criminal justice, which seeks strong and retributive punishment for juvenile offenders, is no longer enough to fundamentally solve juvenile crimes. I think restorative justice, which contributes to the acceptance of juvenile's voluntary responsibility and return to society, and has a positive effect on the recovery of victims and increasing the participation of the local community, needs to be supplemented with the criminal justice system while harmonizing with criminal justice. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze various problems such as the limitations of the restorative justice system in the juvenile justice field, which is being implemented under the current law, and study ways to engage the family and the local community, not just the participation and mediation of both parties. I think it is necessary to introduce criminal mediation tailored to juvenile crimes such as parental participation, and it is necessary to clearly classify the crimes subject to restorative justice, and to clarify the regulations on institutions responsible for implementing restorative justice and procedures. The restorative justice process should be implemented over a long period of time, from six months to one year, as in the United States and the United Kingdom, and more systematic training is urgently required for mediators and participants who practice restorative justice. Through this improvement process, restorative justice will be able to properly achieve the goals of reintegration of the perpetrators into society, the healing of the victimized juveniles, and the restoration of the community in the juvenile justice field.
Abstract
If we look at the characteristics of recent school violence and juvenile crimes, there are many propensities to commit crimes to finance entertainment expenses, Internet games, and gambling, rather than crimes committed because of economically difficult family circumstances. It is being grouped and organized, verbal violence in cyberspace is also increasing, and the tendency to show off crime through SNS is greatly increasing. They seem to have no fear of crime at all, and they seem to lack social skills as well as empathy and conflict resolution skills. It would be said that existing criminal justice, which seeks strong and retributive punishment for juvenile offenders, is no longer enough to fundamentally solve juvenile crimes. I think restorative justice, which contributes to the acceptance of juvenile's voluntary responsibility and return to society, and has a positive effect on the recovery of victims and increasing the participation of the local community, needs to be supplemented with the criminal justice system while harmonizing with criminal justice. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze various problems such as the limitations of the restorative justice system in the juvenile justice field, which is being implemented under the current law, and study ways to engage the family and the local community, not just the participation and mediation of both parties. I think it is necessary to introduce criminal mediation tailored to juvenile crimes such as parental participation, and it is necessary to clearly classify the crimes subject to restorative justice, and to clarify the regulations on institutions responsible for implementing restorative justice and procedures. The restorative justice process should be implemented over a long period of time, from six months to one year, as in the United States and the United Kingdom, and more systematic training is urgently required for mediators and participants who practice restorative justice. Through this improvement process, restorative justice will be able to properly achieve the goals of reintegration of the perpetrators into society, the healing of the victimized juveniles, and the restoration of the community in the juvenile justice field.
참고문헌 (34)
- 김용세, "회복적 사법과 형사 화해" (2009), 진원사
- 학교폭력 대응방안으로서 회복적 소년사법 실험연구, "김은경", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2006)
- 대검찰청, "범죄분석" (2020)
- 한국의 범죄현상과 형사정책, "박준휘", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2017)
- 오영근, "소년법- 조문해설서" (2021), 박영사
- 형사사법체계상 회복적 사법이념의 실천방안, "이진국", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2016)
- 체사레 벡카리아, "범죄와 형벌" (2010), 박영사
- 강지명, "소년법상 보호처분의 체계적 정비방안", 공공사회연구, 7, pp.93~127 (2017), 한국공공사회학회[DOI]
- 강지명, "소년법상 화해권고제도 규정의 문제점과 개선방안", 형사정책, 24(3), pp.99~130 (2012), 한국형사정책학회[DOI]
- 김영진, "학교폭력의 현실과 개선을 위한 정책방안", 법학연구, 20(2), pp.1~26 (2017), 법학연구소
- 김은경, "21세기 소년사법 개혁과 회복적 사법의 가치", 형사정책연구, 18(3), pp.1159~1188 (2007), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 김혁, "피해자 중심적 소년사법・보호정책으로의 전환에 관한 시론", 피해자학연구, 28(3), pp.117~134 (2020), 한국피해자학회[DOI]
- 문재태, "형사조정제도에 관한 검토", 한국정부학회 학술발표논문집 (2015)
- 박광현, "소년사법의 개선방안에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 24(4), pp.97~116 (2016), 법학연구소
- 박상식, "소년범죄와 학교폭력 예방을 위한 회복적 사법의 도입에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 21(2), pp.211~241 (2013), 법학연구소
- 박찬걸, "소년사건 피해자의 인권 강화방안에 대한 검토- 제20대 국회에 제출된 소년법 개정법률안을 중심으로 -", 형사법의 신동향, (71), pp.132~161 (2021), 대검찰청[DOI]
- 신양균, "다문화가정내 가정폭력과 회복적 사법", 법학연구, 34, pp.351~374 (2011), 부설법학연구소
- 신혜진, "소년사법에서 부모 책임에 관한 연구-부모 교육 및 부모 참여를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2020
- 원혜욱, "외국의 회복적 사법제도의 고찰을 통한 우리나라 소년사법정책의 방향", 피해자학연구, 14(1), pp.307~324 (2006), 한국피해자학회
- 원혜욱, "보호관찰단계에서의 회복적 사법의 평가와 실현방안", 법학논집, 16(1), pp.111~127 (2011), 법학연구소
- 윤현석, "소년법상 화해권고제도에 관한 실증적 고찰- 화해권고제도 운영 실태에 관한 화해권고위원 인식 조사 -", 법이론실무연구, 7(1), pp.345~370 (2019), 사단법인 한국법이론실무학회
- 이세원, "아동학대범죄에 대한 새로운 사법적 지향: 회복적 사법의 적용", 교정복지연구, (50), pp.199~230 (2017), 한국교정복지학회[DOI]
- 소년범 조건부기소유예제도의 내실화 방안 연구, "이승현", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2018)
- 이용식, "회복적 정의와 형사사법 정의 - 두 정의의 ‘절충’은 가능한 것인가?", 동아법학, (54), pp.417~448 (2012), 법학연구소
- 이용식, "회복적 사법에 대한 비판적 소고 - 소년범을 중심으로", 소년보호연구, 31(3), pp.285~320 (2018), 한국소년정책학회[DOI]
- 이은영, "소년사법제도의 엄벌화 경향에 대한 비판적 고찰", 교정복지연구, (42), pp.25~60 (2016), 한국교정복지학회
- 이인곤, "학교폭력예방 및 대책으로서 회복적 사법제도에 관한 연구", 법이론실무연구, 6(3), pp.253~292 (2018), 사단법인 한국법이론실무학회
- 이혜리, "회복적 사법의 적용 영역", 비교법연구, 9(1) (2008)
- 이호중, "회복적 사법 이념과 형사제재체계의 개편- 트로이 목마의 투입? 값싼 형벌신상품의 개발?-", 한국형사법연구, (22) (2004)
- 장규원, "회복적 사법의 한계에 대한 고찰", 동아법학, (57), pp.119~144 (2012), 법학연구소
- 김재희, "소년보호관찰에 회복적 사법 프로그램 실천을 위한 제언", 형사정책, 31(1), pp.345~371 (2019), 한국형사정책학회[DOI]
- 조윤오, "소년범죄자에 대한 회복적 사법 연구- 미국의 피해자-가해자 조정(VOM) 프로그램을 중심으로 -", 법학논집, 16(1), pp.151~179 (2011), 법학연구소
- Jane Bolitho, "Inside the restorative justice black box: The role of memory reconsolidation in transforming the emotional impact of violent crime on victims", International Review of Vicimology, 23(3) (2017)
- Jeff Bouffard, "The Effectiveness of Various Restorative Justice Interventions on Recidivism Outcomes Among Juvenile Offenders", Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 1(16) (2016)