A Meta-Analysis of Attitudes toward Doping among Korean Athletes
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
OBJECTIVES The purpose of the current study was to conduct a meta-analysis to comprehensively analyze and identify research on doping attitudes studied in Korea. METHODS Twelve articles were selected for analysis by searching for ‘doping attitudes’ and ‘doping PEAS’ in Korean academic databases. The meta-analysis was conducted using the meta-analysis package in the R program (ver.4.3.2). RESULTS indicated that 12 literatures on Korean athletes’ doping attitudes revealed an average PEAS mean score of 37.20 (95% CI = 34.29, 40.11). Moreover, results found that 10 articles on gender differences in Korean athletes’ doping attitudes showed a small effect size of -0.23 (95% CI = -0.34, -0.12), and a significant difference (p < .0001), with that female had higher mean PEAS scores than males. Results indicated that 4 studies on the difference in doping attitudes based on doping experience were found to have publication bias, so we meta-analyzed two additional studies using a trim-and-fill algorithm and found a moderate effect size of -0.64 (95% CI = -1.23, -0.05), with a significant difference (p = .0343). Additionally, Korean athletes with doping experience had higher mean PEAS scores than those without doping experience. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that attitudes may be important in predicting doping intentions or doping behavior.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of the current study was to conduct a meta-analysis to comprehensively analyze and identify research on doping attitudes studied in Korea. METHODS Twelve articles were selected for analysis by searching for ‘doping attitudes’ and ‘doping PEAS’ in Korean academic databases. The meta-analysis was conducted using the meta-analysis package in the R program (ver.4.3.2). RESULTS indicated that 12 literatures on Korean athletes’ doping attitudes revealed an average PEAS mean score of 37.20 (95% CI = 34.29, 40.11). Moreover, results found that 10 articles on gender differences in Korean athletes’ doping attitudes showed a small effect size of -0.23 (95% CI = -0.34, -0.12), and a significant difference (p < .0001), with that female had higher mean PEAS scores than males. Results indicated that 4 studies on the difference in doping attitudes based on doping experience were found to have publication bias, so we meta-analyzed two additional studies using a trim-and-fill algorithm and found a moderate effect size of -0.64 (95% CI = -1.23, -0.05), with a significant difference (p = .0343). Additionally, Korean athletes with doping experience had higher mean PEAS scores than those without doping experience. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that attitudes may be important in predicting doping intentions or doping behavior.
참고문헌 (38)
- World Anti-Doping Agency(WADA), "World Anti-Doping Code", ~ (2021)
- Blank C, "Predictors of doping intentions, susceptibility, and behavior of elite athletes : A meta-analytic review", Springerplus, 5(1), pp.1~14 (2016)
- Reardon CL, "Drug abuse in athletes", Subst Abuse Rehabil, 5, pp.95~105 (2014)
- Petróczi A, "Can We Better Integrate the Role of Anti-Doping in Sports and Society? A Psychological Approach to Contemporary Value-Based Prevention", Medi Sport Sci, 62, pp.160~176 (2017)
- Stewart B, "Drug use in sport : Implications for public policy", J Sport Soc Issues, 32(3), pp.278~298 (2008)
- Waddington I, "Sport, health and drugs : A critical sociological perspective" (2013), Routledge
- Chan DKC, "Self-determined motivation in sport predicts anti-doping motivation and intention : A perspective from the trans-contextual model", J Science Med Sport, 18(3), pp.315~322 (2015)
- Jalleh G, "Testing the Sport Drug Control Model of Factors Influencing Performance-enhancing Substance Use", Doctor, pp.2013
- Lippi G, "New strategies for doping control", J Sports Sci, 26(5), pp.441~445 (2008)
- Folkerts D, "The performance enhancement attitude scale(PEAS)reached ‘adulthood’ : Lessons and recommendations from a systematic review and meta-analysis", Psychol Sport Exerc, 56, pp.101999~ (2021)
- Ntoumanis N, "Personal and psychosocial predictors of doping use in physical activity settings : A meta-analysis", Sports Med, 44(11), pp.1603~1624 (2014)
- Petróczi A, "Exploring the doping dilemma in elite sport : Can athletes’ attitudes be responsible for doping?", Doctor, pp.2002
- Petróczi A, "Measuring explicit attitude toward doping : Review of the psychometric properties of the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale", Psychol Sport Exerc, 10(3), pp.390~396 (2009)
- Petróczi A, "Attitudes and doping : a structural equation analysis of the relationship between athletes’ attitudes, sport orientation and doping behavior", Subst Abuse : Treat Prev Policy, 2(1), pp.1~15 (2007)
- Kim TG, "Attitudes and dispositions toward doping in adolescent elite athletes", Korean J Sports Med, 31(2), pp.99~106 (2013)
- Jackson GB, "Methods for integrative reviews", Rev Educ Res, 50(3), pp.438~460 (1980)
- Halsey LG, "The fickle P value generates irreproducible results", Nat Methods, 12(3), pp.179~185 (2015)
- Moher D, "Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses : the PRISMA statement", Ann Intern, 151(4), pp.264~269 (2009)
- Schmitt N, "Research methods in human resources management" (1991), South-Western Pub
- Higgins JPT, "Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.4(updated September 2023)", Cochrane, ~ (2023)
- Bernard RM, "A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education", Rev Educ Res, 79(3), pp.1243~1289 (2009)
- Cohen J, "Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences" (1988), Lawrence Earlbaum Associates
- Egger M, "Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test", BMJ, 315(7109), pp.629~634 (1997)
- Alaranta A, "Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping : differences between type of sport", Int J Sports Med, 27(10), pp.842~846 (2006)
- Lucidi F, "The social-cognitive mechanisms regulating adolescents’use of doping substances", J Sports Sci, 26(5), pp.447~456 (2008)
- Peretti-Watel P, "Attitudes toward doping and recreational drug use among French elite student-athletes", Sociol Sport J, 21(1), pp.1~17 (2004)
- Waldron JJ, "Whatever it takes : Health compromising behaviors in female athletes", Quest, 57(3), pp.315~329 (2005)
- Moran A, "The development and validation of a doping attitudes and behavior scale", ~ (2008)
- Won YI, "A Study on the Attitudes and Dispositions of Doping in Professional and University Soccer Players", Korean J Sports Sci, 28(1), pp.1093~1102 (2019)
- Kim EK, "Relationship between attitudes toward doping and sports orientations in achievement motivation among racket sports players", Korean J Sport, 14(4), pp.875~883 (2016)
- Park J, "The Investigation of Influencing Factors to Attitude toward Doping in Korean Athletic Players", J Digit Converg, 17(5), pp.391~398 (2019)
- Dunn M, "Elite athletes’ estimates of the prevalence of illicit drug use : evidence for the false consensus effect", Drug Alcohol Rev, 31(1), pp.27~32 (2012)
- Kim EK, "Beliefs, Knowledge and Attitudes of Doping among Korea National Sport University Students", Sport Sci, 32(2), pp.43~50 (2015)
- Kim EK, "Relation and Difference in Attitudes, Beliefs and Knowledge for Doping between Elite and Elite Adolescent Athletes in Korea", Korean Soc Sports Sci, 23(4), pp.377~389 (2014)
- Hauw D, "Patterns in the situated activity of substance use in the careers of elite doping athletes", Psychol Sport Exerc, 16, pp.156~163 (2015)
- Wiefferink CH, "Social psychological determinants of the use of performance-enhancing drugs by gym users", Health Educ Res, 23(1), pp.70~80 (2008)
- Sas-Nowosielski K, "The knowledge of the world anti-doping code among Polish athletes and their attitudes toward doping and anti-doping policy", Human (2007)
- Wolff W, "The effect of implicitly incentivized faking on explicit and implicit measures of doping attitude : when athletes want to pretend an even more negative attitude to doping", PloS One, 10(4), pp.e0118507~ (2015)