Advances in Markerless Motion Capture Systems: A Review of OpenCap and Its Applications
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Motion capture technology has long been a cornerstone of biomechanical research and analysis, traditionally relying on marker-based systems. However, these systems have inherent limitations, including high costs, time-consuming setup, and constraints on natural movement. Recent advancements in computer vision and machine learning have paved the way for markerless motion capture systems, such as OpenCap, which offer a more accessible and natural approach to biomechanical analysis. This review focuses on OpenCap, exploring its accuracy, challenges, and future potential, while comparing it with traditional motion capture technologies and discussing its applications in sports, clinical rehabilitation, and everyday use. Areas in need of refinement, such as improving pose estimation algorithms and addressing inter-trial variability, are identified as key future research directions. Other markerless systems are also compared in terms of advantages, limitations, and application. The findings suggest that while OpenCap and similar systems hold significant promise, further research and refinement are necessary to fully realize their potential and integrate them seamlessly into various biomechanical applications.
Abstract
Motion capture technology has long been a cornerstone of biomechanical research and analysis, traditionally relying on marker-based systems. However, these systems have inherent limitations, including high costs, time-consuming setup, and constraints on natural movement. Recent advancements in computer vision and machine learning have paved the way for markerless motion capture systems, such as OpenCap, which offer a more accessible and natural approach to biomechanical analysis. This review focuses on OpenCap, exploring its accuracy, challenges, and future potential, while comparing it with traditional motion capture technologies and discussing its applications in sports, clinical rehabilitation, and everyday use. Areas in need of refinement, such as improving pose estimation algorithms and addressing inter-trial variability, are identified as key future research directions. Other markerless systems are also compared in terms of advantages, limitations, and application. The findings suggest that while OpenCap and similar systems hold significant promise, further research and refinement are necessary to fully realize their potential and integrate them seamlessly into various biomechanical applications.
참고문헌 (28)
- Baker R, "Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 3, pp.4~ (2006)
- Richards J, "Biomechanics in Clinic and Research: An Interactive Teaching and Learning Course", pp.2008, Churchill Livingstone
- Colyer SL, "A review of the evolution of vision-based motion analysis and the integration of advanced computer vision methods towards developing a markerless system", Sports Med Open, 4(1), pp.24~ (2018)
- Uhlrich SD, "OpenCap : Human movement dynamics from smartphone videos", PLoS Comput Biol, 19(10), pp.e1011462~ (2023)
- Turner JA, "Validation of OpenCap : A low-cost markerless motion capture system for lower-extremity kinematics during return-to-sport tasks", J Biomech, 171, pp.112200~ (2024)
- Horsak B, "Concurrent validity of smartphone-based markerless motion capturing to quantify lower-limb joint kinematics in healthy and pathological gait", J Biomech, 159, pp.111801~ (2023)
- Horsak B, "Inter-trial variability is higher in 3D markerless compared to marker-based motion capture : Implications for data post-processing and analysis", J Biomech, 166, pp.112049~ (2024)
- Richards JG, "The measurement of human motion : A comparison of commercially available systems", Hum Mov Sci, 18(5), pp.589~602 (1999)
- Cappozzo A, "Position and orientation in space of bones during movement : experimental artefacts", Clin Biomech(Bristol, Avon), 11(2), pp.90~100 (1996)
- Reinschmidt C, "Tibiofemoral and tibiocalcaneal motion during walking:external vs. skeletal markers", Gait Posture, 6(2), pp.98~109 (1997)
- Holden JP, "Surface movement errors in shank kinematics and knee kinetics during gait", Gait Posture, 5(3), pp.217~227 (1997)
- Hume DR, "Comparison of marker-based and stereo radiography knee kinematics in activities of daily living", Ann Biomed Eng, 46(11), pp.1806~1815 (2018)
- Kessler SE, "A direct comparison of biplanar videoradiography and optical motion capture for foot and ankle kinematics", Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 7, pp.199~ (2019)
- Li K, "The inaccuracy of surface-measured model-derived tibiofemoral kinematics", J Biomech, 45(15), pp.2719~2723 (2012)
- Chiari L, "Cappozzo A. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 2:instrumental errors", Gait Posture, 21(2), pp.197~211 (2005)
- Ueno R, "Calibrationless monocular vision musculoskeletal simulation during gait", Heliyon, 10(11), pp.e32078~ (2024)
- Yu J, "Key transition technology of ski jumping based on inertial motion unit, kinematics and dynamics", Biomed Eng Online, 22(1), pp.21~ (2023)
- Li Z, "Real-time capture of snowboarder’s skiing motion using a 3D vision sensor", Wirel Commun Mob Comput, 2021(1), pp.8517771~ (2021)
- Kim H, "Approaches for hybrid coregistration of marker-based and markerless coordinates describing complex body", object interactions, 2023, pp.23(14), ~
- Kanko RM, "Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture", J Biomech, 127, pp.110665~ (2021)
- Kanko RM, "Assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters using a deep learning algorithm-based markerless motion capture system", J Biomech, 122, pp.110414~ (2021)
- Mathis A, "DeepLabCut : Markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning", Nat Neurosci, 21(9), pp.1281~1289 (2018)
- Nath T, "Using DeepLabCut for 3D markerless pose estimation across species and behaviors", Nat Protoc, 14(7), pp.2152~2176 (2019)
- Harsted S, "Concurrent validity of lower extremity kinematics and jump characteristics captured in pre-school children by a markerless 3D motion capture system", Chiropr Man Therap, 27, pp.39~ (2019)
- Harsted S, "Test-retest reliability and agreement of lower-extremity kinematics captured in squatting and jumping preschool children using markerless motion capture technology", Front Digit Health, 4, pp.1027647~ (2022)
- Hewett TE, "Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes : a prospective study", Am J Sports Med, 33(4), pp.492~501 (2005)
- Larwa J, "Stiff landings, core stability, and dynamic knee valgus : A systematic review on documented anterior cruciate ligament ruptures in male and female athletes", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(7), pp.3826~ (2021)
- Shin CS, "Valgus plus internal rotation moments increase anterior cruciate ligament strain more than either alone", Med Sci Sports Exerc, 43(8), pp.1484~1491 (2011)