좁은 직경 임플란트의 후향적 관찰 연구
Retrospective Observational Study of Narrow Diameter Implants
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To Analyse clinical treatment outcomes and prognosis of patients who have received narrow diameter implants due to anterior tooth loss, and to assess long-term success measured through radiological examination. Material and Methods: From December 2006 to June 2017, Thirty-six patients were selected, and fifty-two narrow diameter implants were inserted by 1 surgeon. All prosthetic appliance were fabricated by the two prosthodontist. The dental records of each patient were reviewed. Measuring of marginal bone loss and accessing implant success rate were performed. Results: Thirty-nine NR lines (Dentium, Suwon, Korea) and thirteen Slim lines (Dentium, Suwon, and Korea) were inserted. The implant used was 2mm to 4.3mm in diameter and 9mm to 12mm in length. NR line implant success rate was 87.2%, survival rate was 92.1%, and Slimline line implant success rate was 92.3%, and survival rate was 92.3%. The average marginal bone loss was 0.22±0.4 mm and 0.07 ± 0.23 mm respectively. Conclusion: The narrow diameter implant is a reliable implant treatment that can be used in patients with problems with tooth loss. The success rate between the NR line and the slim lines implant was not significantly different and was clinically acceptable.
Abstract
Purpose: To Analyse clinical treatment outcomes and prognosis of patients who have received narrow diameter implants due to anterior tooth loss, and to assess long-term success measured through radiological examination. Material and Methods: From December 2006 to June 2017, Thirty-six patients were selected, and fifty-two narrow diameter implants were inserted by 1 surgeon. All prosthetic appliance were fabricated by the two prosthodontist. The dental records of each patient were reviewed. Measuring of marginal bone loss and accessing implant success rate were performed. Results: Thirty-nine NR lines (Dentium, Suwon, Korea) and thirteen Slim lines (Dentium, Suwon, and Korea) were inserted. The implant used was 2mm to 4.3mm in diameter and 9mm to 12mm in length. NR line implant success rate was 87.2%, survival rate was 92.1%, and Slimline line implant success rate was 92.3%, and survival rate was 92.3%. The average marginal bone loss was 0.22±0.4 mm and 0.07 ± 0.23 mm respectively. Conclusion: The narrow diameter implant is a reliable implant treatment that can be used in patients with problems with tooth loss. The success rate between the NR line and the slim lines implant was not significantly different and was clinically acceptable.
참고문헌 (26)
- Hak-Kyun Kim, "Five-year retrospective radiographic follow-up study of dental implants with sandblasting with large grit, and acid etching-treated surfaces", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 41(6), pp.317~321 (2015), 대한구강악안면외과학회
- Jun-Yu Shi, "Long-term outcomes of narrow diameter implants in posterior jaws: A retrospective study with at least 8-year follow-up", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29, pp.76~81 (2018)
- Mohammed Alrabiah, "Comparison of survival rate and crestal bone loss of narrow diameter dental implants versus regular dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis", J Invest Clin Dent, pp.e12367~ (2018)
- Eik Schiegnitz, "Narrow-diameter implants: A systematic review and metaanalysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29(Suppl. 16), pp.21~40 (2018)
- Marcello-Machado RM, "Mini-implants and narrow diameter implants as mandibular overdenture retainers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes", J Oral Rehabil, 45, pp.161~183 (2018)
- Degidi M, "Clinical outcome of narrow diameter implants: a retrospective study of 510 implants", J Periodontol, 79, pp.49~54 (2008)
- Chia-Yun Tsai, "Application of narrow-diameter implant in a limited space", J Dent Sci, 5, pp.114~120 (2010)
- Hallman M, "A prospective study of treatment of severely resorbed maxillae with narrow nonsubmerged implants: Result after 1 year of loading", Int. J Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 16, pp.731~736 (2001)
- Schiegnitz E, "Oral rehabilitation with dental implants in irradiated patients: A meta-analysis on implant survival", Clin Oral Investig, 18, pp.687~698 (2014)
- Walter C, "Dental implants in patients treated with antiresorptive medication - a systematic literature review", Int J Implant Dent, 2, pp.9~ (2016)
- Sarra Jawad, "A pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating mini and conventional implant retained dentures on the function and quality of life of patients with an edentulous mandible", BMC Oral Health, 17, pp.53~ (2017)
- Romeo E, "Clinical and radiographic evaluation of small-diameter (3.3-mm) implants followed for 1-7 years: a longitudinal study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 17, pp.139~148 (2006)
- Osvaldo Moraguez, "Four-unit fixed dental prostheses replacing the maxillary incisors supported by two narrow-diameter implants - a five-year case series", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28, pp.887~892 (2017)
- Jagjit S. Dhaliwal, "Osseointegration of standard and mini dental implants; A histomorphometric comparison", Int J Implant Dent, 3, pp.15~ (2017)
- Marc O Klein, "Systemic review on success of narrow-diameter dental Implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 29, pp.43~54 (2014)
- Avinash S. Bidra, "Mini implants for definitive prosthodontic treatment: A systemic review", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.156~164 (2013)
- Marco Degidi, "Clinical outcome of narrow diameter Implants:A retrospective study of 510 Implants", J Periodontol, 79, pp.49~54 (2008)
- Paolo Vigolo, "Clinical evaluation of small-diameter implants in single-tooth and multiple-implant restorations: A 7-year retrospective studu", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.703~709 (2004)
- 배민수, "좁은 결손부위에 One-piece narrow diameter implant를 이용한 즉시보철: 증례보고", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 35(4), pp.276~279 (2009), 대한구강악안면외과학회
- Paolo Vigolo, "Clinical Evaluation of single-tooth mini-implant restorations: A fiveyear retrospective strudy", J Prosthet Dent, 84, pp.50~54 (2000)
- Malo P, "Implants(3.3mm diameter) for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior regions: A retrospective clinical study with up to 11 years of follow-up", Clin Implants Res, 13, pp.95~103 (2011)
- Baggi L, "The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: A three-dimensional finite element analysis", J Prosthet Dent, 100, pp.422~431 (2008)
- Ding X, "Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: A three-dimensional finite element analysis", J Prosthodont, 18, pp.393~402 (2009)
- Albrektsson T, "The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants:A review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
- Sohn DS, "Retrospective multicenter analysis of immediate provisionalization using one-piece narrow-diameter(3.0 mm) implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.163~168 (2011)
- Arisan V, "Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5-10 years: A clinical and radiographic retrospective study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp.296~307 (2010)