지오지브라를 활용한 금속의 결정 구조 모델링 교육 자료 개발

키워드

참고문헌 (64)

1. 기연진, "GeoGebra 자료를 활용한 융합교육에서 M-STEAM 수업의효과에 대한 연구 - 일반계 고등학생을 대상으로 -", 현장과학교육, 8(1), pp.43~61 (2014), 한국현장과학교육학회[DOI]
2. 노태희, "원자 및 분자 개념을 표상한 시각자료에 대한 중학생들의 이해 및 해석 과정", 대한화학회지, 53(3), pp.355~367 (2009), 대한화학회
3. 박종석, "화학 II" (2019), 비상교육
4. 배중연, "고등학교 화학II 고체 단원에서 최조밀 채움(closest packing) 설명 방법", 현장과학교육, 9(3), pp.225~232 (2015), 한국현장과학교육학회[DOI]
5. 심혜진, "GeoGebra를 활용한 STEAM 수학 수업 지도방안 연구", 석사, pp.2015
6. 이승우, "융합인재교육(STEAM)을 적용한 초등 수학영재 교육 프로그램의 개발과 적용 효과", 초등수학교육, 16(1), pp.35~55 (2013), 한국수학교육학회
7. 임용근, "융합교육을 위한 수학교육적 도구인 ‘GeoGebra’를 활용한 수업활동 개발 및 적용: 중학교 2학년 대상으로", 석사, pp.2015
8. Albanese A, "Why do we believe that an atom is colourless? Reflections about the teaching of the particle model", Science & Education, 6(3), pp.251~261 (1997)
9. Axelrod R, "The Complexity of Cooperation : Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration" (1997), Princeton University Press
10. Balmer M, "Large-scale multi-agent simulations for transportation applications", Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 8(4), pp.205~221 (2004)
11. Brady C, "Sandboxes for model-based inquiry", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2), pp.265~286 (2015)
12. Buckley BC, "Modelbased teaching and learning with biologica: What do they learn? how do they learn? How do we know?", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), pp.23~41 (2004)
13. Chi MT, "Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes:Why some misconceptions are robust?", J. Learn. Sci, 14(2), pp.161~199 (2005)
14. Epstein JM, "Growing Artificial Societies : Social Science from the Bottom Up" (1996), Brookings Institution Press
15. Furio C, "Difficulties with the geometry and polarity of molecules : Beyond misconceptions", Journal of Chemical Education, 73(1), pp.36~ (1996)
16. Gilbert JK, "Models and modelling : Routes to more authentic science education", Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ, 2(2), pp.115~130 (2004)
17. Gilbert JK, "Multiple Representations in Chemical Education" (2009), Springer
18. Helbing D, "The physics of traffic and regional development", Contemp. Phys, 45(5), pp.405~426 (2004)
19. Hohenwarter M, "Ways of linking geometry and algebra: The case of geogebra", Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 27, pp.126~131 (2007)
20. The second metamorphosis of science: A second view, "Jackson EA", Santa Fe Institute, ~, pp.Papers 9039-9606 (1996)
21. Jackson SL, "Making dynamic modeling accessible to precollege science students", Interact. Learn. Envir, 4(3), pp.233~257 (1994)
22. Jensen WB, "Logic, history, and the chemistry textbook: I. Does chemistry have a logical structure?", J. Chem. Educ, 75(6), pp.679~687 (1998)
23. Johnstone AH, "Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem", J. Comput. Assist. Learn, 7(2), pp.75~83 (1991)
24. Johnstone AH, "Teaching of chemistry-logical or psychological? Chem", Educ. Res. Pract, 1(1), pp.9~15 (2000)
25. Kim SK, "Hands-on experiment to verify consistency from bulk density to atomic and ionic radii with lumps of metals and ionic compounds", J. Chem. Educ, 96(10), pp.2271~2278 (2019)
26. Klopfer E, "Technologies to support the creation of complex systems models—using StarLogo software with students", Biosystems, 71(1-2), pp.111~122 (2003)
27. Kostić VD, "Sekulić TM & Takači DB(2016)Visualization of problem solving related to the quantitative composition of solutions in the dynamic geogebra environment", Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), pp.120~138 (2016)
28. Lee O, "Changing middle school students’ conceptions of matter and molecules", J. Res. Sci. Teach, 30(3), pp.249~270 (1993)
29. Liguori L, "A tasty approach to statistical experimental design in high school chemistry : The best lemon cake", Journal of Chemical Education, 94(4), pp.465~470 (2017)
30. Lucic D, "Simulation of the two-body problem in GeoGebra", Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica, 12(3), pp.47~50 (2012)
31. Luisi PL, "Emergence in chemistry : Chemistry as the embodiment of emergence", Foundations of Chemistry, 4, pp.183~200 (2002)
32. Maas K, "Modeling Students’ Mathematical Modeling Competencies" (2010), Springer
33. Malgieri M, "Teaching quantum physics by the sum overpaths approach and geogebra simulations", European Journal of Physics, 35(5), pp.055024~ (2014)
34. McMurry JE, "General Chemistry" (2014), Peason
35. National Research Council, "Report of a Workshop on the Pedagogical Aspects of Computational Thinking" (2011), The National Academies Press
36. Noth M, "An extensible, modular architecture for simulating urban development, transportation, and environmental impacts", Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27(2), pp.181~203 (2003)
37. Oxtoby D, "Principles of Modern Chemistry" (2011), Cengage Learning
38. Pagels HR, "The Dreams of Reason : The Computer and the Rise of the Sciences of Complexity" (1988), Simon & Schuster
39. Parnafes O, "What does"fast"mean? Understanding the physical world through computational representations", J. Learn. Sci, 16(3), pp.415~450 (2007)
40. Penner DE, "Explaining systems : Investigating middle school students’ understanding of emergent phenomena", J. Res. Sci. Teach, 37(8), pp.784~806 (2000)
41. Reiner M, "Naive physics reasoning : A commitment to substance-based conceptions", Cogn. Inst, 18(1), pp.1~34 (2000)
42. Sanmarti N, "The substantialisation of properties", Sci. Educ, 4(4), pp.349~369 (1995)
43. Schwarz CV, "Technology, pedagogy, and epistemology: opportunities and challenges of using somputer modeling and simulation tools in elementary science methods", J. Sci. Teach. Educ, 18(2), pp.243~269 (2007)
44. Sengupta P, "Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation : A theoretical framework", Educ. Info. Technol, 18(2), pp.351~380 (2013)
45. Sherin BL, "A comparison of programming languages and algebraic notation as expressive language for physics", Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn, 6(1), pp.1~61 (2001)
46. Sherin BL, "Dynaturtle revisited : learning physics through collaborative design of a computer model", Interact. Learn. Envir, 3(2), pp.91~118 (1993)
47. Talanquer V, "Progressions in reasoning about structureproperty relationships", Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), pp.998~1009 (2018)
48. Taub R, "The effect of computer science on physics learning in a computational science environment", Comput. Educ, 87, pp.10~23 (2015)
49. Tuckey H, "Identification and rectification of student difficulties concerning three-dimensional structures, rotation, and reflection", J. Chem. Educ, 68(6), pp.460~ (1991)
50. Tumay H, "Emergence, learning difficulties, and misconceptions in chemistry undergraduate students’ conceptualizations of acid strength", Sci. Educ, 25(1), pp.21~46 (2016)
51. Wagh A, "Building v", s Exploring Models: Comparing Learning of Evolutionary Processes through Agent-based Modeling, Northwestern University, 2016
52. Wagh S, "Review on wind-solar hybrid power system", Int. J. Res. Sci. Eng, 3(2), pp.71~76 (2017)
53. Walsh T, "Creating interactive physics simulations using the power of GeoGebra", The Physics Teacher, 55(5), pp.316~317 (2017)
54. Weintrop D, "Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms", J. Sci. Educ. Technol, 25(1), pp.127~147 (2015)
55. West JJ, "Climate Change and Risk", pp.205~ (1999), Routledge
56. White BY, "Thinker tools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education", Cogn. Instr, 10(1), pp.1~100 (1993)
57. White BY, "Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students", Cogn. Instr, 16(1), pp.3~118 (1998)
58. Wilensky U, "Paradox, programming, and learning probability:A case study in a connected mathematics framework", J. Math. Behav, 14(2), pp.253~280 (1995)
59. Wilensky U, "What is normal anyway? Therapy for epistemological anxiety", Educ. Stud. Math, 33(2), pp.171~202 (1997)
60. Wilensky U, "Statistical mechanics for secondary school : The gasLab multi-agent modeling toolkit", Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn, 8(1), pp.1~41 (2003)
61. Wilensky U, "Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories-An embodied modeling approach", Cogn. Instr, 24(2), pp.171~209 (2006)
62. Wilkerson-Jerde MH, "Construction, categorization, and consensus: Student generated computational artifacts as a context for disciplinary reflection", Educ. Technol. Res. Dev, 62(1), pp.99~121 (2014)
63. Wilkerson-Jerde MH, "Patterns, probabilities, and people: Making sense of quantitative change in complex systems", J. Learn. Sci, 24(2), pp.204~251 (2015)
64. Zumdahl SS, "Chemistry" (2010), Cengage Learning

관련 논문AI추천