Is Double J Stenting or Percutaneous Nephrostomy More Suitable for Maximizing the Clinical Effects of Temporary Urinary Diversion for Acute Pyelonephritis with a Complicated Ureteral Stone?
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study compared the clinical benefits of double J (DJ) ureteral stenting with percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) for the management of acute pyelone-phritis (APN) with complicated ureteral stones.Materials and Methods: The records of 85 patients with complicated APN between December 2006 and July 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Sixty one patients who underwent DJ or PCN for the management of acute urinary obstruction were enrolled in this study. Some of the participants were excluded for concurrent renal stones, multiple ureteral stones, ureteral stricture, malignancy, and anatomical anomalies. The patient and stone characteristics and peri-procedural laboratory test results of the groups were compared. The success rate, depending on the type of urinary diversion and the presence of immediate complications, were also anal-yzed.Results: In this study, 19 patients underwent DJ stenting, and 42 patients underwent PCN as a transient urinary diversion. No failed procedures or immediate com-plications requiring subsequent intervention were encountered (Clavien–Dindo grade II-V). Urologists preferred PCN to DJ stenting in cases with an elevated serum creatinine level (p=0.001) and higher C-reactive protein (CRP) level (p＜0.001). The indicative parameters for renal injury and septic conditions (white blood cell count, segment neutrophil, and creatinine levels) tended to show immediate improvement, whereas CRP did not; however, the differences in markers were not significant (p=0.701, 0.962, 0.288, and 0.360, respectively).Conclusions: Both DJ stenting and PCN were safe and feasible methods for the management of complicated APN. With experienced urologists or radiologists, there may be little danger of prolonged renal failure or other procedure-related complications.
Abstract
Purpose: This study compared the clinical benefits of double J (DJ) ureteral stenting with percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) for the management of acute pyelone-phritis (APN) with complicated ureteral stones.Materials and Methods: The records of 85 patients with complicated APN between December 2006 and July 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Sixty one patients who underwent DJ or PCN for the management of acute urinary obstruction were enrolled in this study. Some of the participants were excluded for concurrent renal stones, multiple ureteral stones, ureteral stricture, malignancy, and anatomical anomalies. The patient and stone characteristics and peri-procedural laboratory test results of the groups were compared. The success rate, depending on the type of urinary diversion and the presence of immediate complications, were also anal-yzed.Results: In this study, 19 patients underwent DJ stenting, and 42 patients underwent PCN as a transient urinary diversion. No failed procedures or immediate com-plications requiring subsequent intervention were encountered (Clavien–Dindo grade II-V). Urologists preferred PCN to DJ stenting in cases with an elevated serum creatinine level (p=0.001) and higher C-reactive protein (CRP) level (p＜0.001). The indicative parameters for renal injury and septic conditions (white blood cell count, segment neutrophil, and creatinine levels) tended to show immediate improvement, whereas CRP did not; however, the differences in markers were not significant (p=0.701, 0.962, 0.288, and 0.360, respectively).Conclusions: Both DJ stenting and PCN were safe and feasible methods for the management of complicated APN. With experienced urologists or radiologists, there may be little danger of prolonged renal failure or other procedure-related complications.
참고문헌 (13)
- Hamasuna R, "Obstructive pyelonephritis as a result of urolithiasis in Japan : diagnosis, treatment and prognosis", Int J Urol, 22, pp.294~300 (2015)
- 김봉영, "Descriptive Epidemiology of Acute Pyelonephritis in Korea, 2010–2014: Population-based Study", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 33(49), pp.1~11 (2018), 대한의학회
- 이동기, "Acute Pyelonephritis: Clinical Characteristics and the Role of the Surgical Treatment", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 24(2), pp.296~301 (2009), 대한의학회
- Richter S, "The indwelling ureteric stent : a 'friendly' procedure with unfriendly high morbidity", BJU Int, 85, pp.408~411 (2000)
- Ku JH, "Percutaneous nephrostomy versus indwelling ureteral stents in the management of extrinsic ureteral obstruction in advanced malignancies : are there differences?", Urology, 64, pp.895~899 (2004)
- Baishya RK, "Percutaneous nephrostomy under ultrasound guidance", Indian J Nephrol, 21, pp.67~ (2011)
- Preminger GM, "EAU", AUA Nephrolithiasis Guideline Panel. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi, 2007, pp.178, 2418~2434
- Goldsmith ZG, "Emergent ureteric stent vs percutaneous nephrostomy for obstructive urolithiasis with sepsis: patterns of use and outcomes from a 15-year experience", BJU Int, 112, pp.E122~E128 (2013)
- Mokhmalji H, "Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteral stents for diversion of hydronephrosis caused by stones : a prospective, randomized clinical trial", J Urol, 165, pp.1088~1092 (2001)
- Pearle MS, "Optimal method of urgent decompression of the collecting system for obstruction and infection due to ureteral calculi", J Urol, 160, pp.1260~1264 (1998)
- Van Glabeke E, "Treatment of complicated renal colic in patients treated with indinavir : value of double J stents", Prog Urol, 9, pp.470~473 (1999)
- Stables DP, "Percutaneous nephrostomy : techniques, indications, and results", Urol Clin North Am, 9, pp.15~29 (1982)
- Stanley P, "Percutaneous nephrostomy in infants and children", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 141, pp.473~477 (1983)