Korean Translation of the GRADE Series Published in the BMJ, ‘Use of GRADE Grid to Reach Decisions on Clinical Practice Guidelines When Consensus Is Elusive’ (A Secondary Publication)
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article is the last of a series providing guidance for the use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system for rating the quality of evidence and grading the strength of recommendations in systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. Formulating recommendations with the applicable evidence can be difficult due to the large and diverse nature of guideline committees. This article describes a simple technique called the GRADE grid for clarifying the opinions from guideline panels, dealing with disagreement, and achieving consensus among guideline panels. The grid may be helpful for any guideline groups who want to use GRADE to develop their guidelines and achieve consensus or understand the patterns of uncertainty that surround the interpretation of scientific evidence.
Abstract
This article is the last of a series providing guidance for the use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system for rating the quality of evidence and grading the strength of recommendations in systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. Formulating recommendations with the applicable evidence can be difficult due to the large and diverse nature of guideline committees. This article describes a simple technique called the GRADE grid for clarifying the opinions from guideline panels, dealing with disagreement, and achieving consensus among guideline panels. The grid may be helpful for any guideline groups who want to use GRADE to develop their guidelines and achieve consensus or understand the patterns of uncertainty that surround the interpretation of scientific evidence.
참고문헌 (16)
- Schünemann HJ, "An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations", Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 174, pp.605~614 (2006)
- Guyatt GH, "GRADE : an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations", BMJ, 336, pp.924~926 (2008)
- Guyatt GH, "What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?", BMJ, 336, pp.995~998 (2008)
- Guyatt GH, "Going from evidence to recommendations", BMJ, 336, pp.1049~1051 (2008)
- Schünemann HJ, "Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies", BMJ, 336, pp.1106~1110 (2008)
- Guyatt GH, "Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations", BMJ, 336, pp.1170~1173 (2008)
- Fretheim A, "Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. group composition and consultation process", Health Res Policy Syst, 4, pp.15~ (2006)
- Fretheim A, "Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. group processes", Health Res Policy Syst, 4, pp.17~ (2006)
- Murphy MK, "Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development", Health Technol Assess, 2, pp.1~88 (1998)
- Thangaratinam S, "The Delphi technique", Obstet Gynaecol, 7, pp.120~125 (2005)
- Vella K, "Use of consensus development to establish national research priorities in critical care", BMJ, 320, pp.976~980 (2000)
- Bion JF, "Development of core competencies for an international training programme in intensive care medicine", Intensive Care Med, 32, pp.1371~1383 (2006)
- Raine R, "Developing clinical guidelines : a challenge to current methods", BMJ, 331, pp.631~633 (2005)
- Dellinger RP, "Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008", Crit Care Med, 36, pp.296~327 (2008)
- Eichacker PQ, "Surviving sepsis--practice guidelines, marketing campaigns, and Eli Lilly", N Engl J Med, 355, pp.1640~1642 (2006)
- Jaeschke R, "Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive", BMJ, 337, pp.a744~ (2008)