학부번역전공자의 인간번역과 기계번역 포스트에디팅 품질 비교
Comparing human translation and post-edited machine translation: A case study of Korean undergraduate students
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Sun-Woo Lee and Sang-Bin Lee (2021). Comparing human translation andpost-edited machine translation: A case study of Korean undergraduate students. Thequality of machine translation outputs, including those of Google Translate and NaverPapago, has increased rapidly over the last few years. This development has raisedthe question of whether the current undergraduate translator training program is stillrelevant and feasible. Against this backdrop, a small-scale experiment was conductedin this study to assess the quality of human translation and post-edited machinetranslation undertaken by university students. The participants were two groups of 30Korean undergraduates who attended a basic translation course in the springsemester of 2021. They were asked to translate two Korean texts, Text A (171characters) and Text B (160 characters), both of which were extracted from relativelyeasy newspaper articles, into their B language (English) under two differentconditions. One of the participant groups translated Text A for 10 minutes usingmachine translation outputs and translated Text B for 20 minutes without the help ofany translation machine. The other group performed the same tasks, save that thesource texts were assigned in reverse order. A total of 117 translations were collectedand rated independently on a five-point scale by the two teacher-researchers. Theresults showed that the post-edited translations were much better than the humantranslations and that the human translations contained more errors in vocabulary andgrammar. (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Republic of Korea)
Abstract
Sun-Woo Lee and Sang-Bin Lee (2021). Comparing human translation andpost-edited machine translation: A case study of Korean undergraduate students. Thequality of machine translation outputs, including those of Google Translate and NaverPapago, has increased rapidly over the last few years. This development has raisedthe question of whether the current undergraduate translator training program is stillrelevant and feasible. Against this backdrop, a small-scale experiment was conductedin this study to assess the quality of human translation and post-edited machinetranslation undertaken by university students. The participants were two groups of 30Korean undergraduates who attended a basic translation course in the springsemester of 2021. They were asked to translate two Korean texts, Text A (171characters) and Text B (160 characters), both of which were extracted from relativelyeasy newspaper articles, into their B language (English) under two differentconditions. One of the participant groups translated Text A for 10 minutes usingmachine translation outputs and translated Text B for 20 minutes without the help ofany translation machine. The other group performed the same tasks, save that thesource texts were assigned in reverse order. A total of 117 translations were collectedand rated independently on a five-point scale by the two teacher-researchers. Theresults showed that the post-edited translations were much better than the humantranslations and that the human translations contained more errors in vocabulary andgrammar. (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Republic of Korea)
참고문헌 (50)
- 김순미, "신경망번역기(NMT) 활용 학부 번역교육의 가능성 연구", 통번역교육연구, 15(3), pp.5~37 (2017), 한국통번역교육학회[DOI]
- 김은영, "AI기계번역을 활용한 외국어교육의 방향성- 포스트에디팅 수업 사례를 통해 -", 언어학연구, 26(1), pp.23~42 (2021), 한국언어연구학회
- 김혜림, "학부생 번역자의 중한 기계번역 포스트에디팅 사례연구", 중국언어연구, (91), pp.383~414 (2020), 한국중국언어학회[DOI]
- 남보리, "LSP 관점에서 바라본 기계번역 포스트에디팅의 전략적 지향점: 스타일 가이드 지침 연구 및 LSP 기계번역 서비스 사례", 번역･언어･기술, 2, pp.5~43 (2021)
- 마승혜, "한영 기계번역 포스트 에디팅에 대한 경험적 고찰: 학부 교육 과정 및 결과를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 22(1), pp.53~88 (2018), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 박건영, "정보성 텍스트의 한영 기계번역 포스트에디팅 가이드라인 제시—신경망 기계번역(NMT)을 사용한 뉴스 기사문 번역의 사례", 번역학연구, 22(1), pp.109~137 (2021), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 박옥수, "한영 기계 번역에서 ST의 유형적 특징에 따른 번역 오류 분석", 동아인문학, (41), pp.155~183 (2017), 동아인문학회
- 박옥수, "원천언어의 관점에서 살펴본 기계번역의 오류분석과 수정 원칙: 비문학 텍스트의 통사적 특징에 근거해서", 동아인문학, (44), pp.151~171 (2018), 동아인문학회[DOI]
- 변길자, "기계번역을 활용한 한영번역에서의 번역품질 비교연구", 영어영문학, 26(3), pp.233~259 (2021), 미래영어영문학회[DOI]
- 서보현, "기계번역 결과물의 오류유형 고찰", 번역학연구, 19(1), pp.99~117 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 신지선, "기계번역 포스트에디팅에 관한 해외 연구 동향", 번역학연구, 21(4), pp.87~114 (2020), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 원은하, "국내 기계번역 연구 현황 및 전망", 인문-IT융합논총, 1(1), pp.11~28 (2019)
- 윤미선, "영어-한국어 언어쌍에 적합한 포스트에디팅 가이드라인: 미래 포스트에디터를 위한 가이드라인과 그 실례", 번역학연구, 19(5), pp.43~76 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이상빈, "학부번역전공자의 기계번역 포스트에디팅, 무엇이 문제이고, 무엇을 가르쳐야 하는가?", 통역과 번역, 19(3), pp.37~64 (2017), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 이상빈, "학부 번역전공자의 구글 기계번역 포스트에디팅에 관한 현상학 연구", 통번역학연구, 22(1), pp.117~143 (2018), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 이상빈, "국내학부 번역전공자의 구글 기계번역 포스트에디팅 과정(process) 및 행위 연구", 번역학연구, 19(3), pp.259~286 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이상빈, "기계번역에 관한 KCI 연구논문 리뷰: 인문학 저널 논문(2011∼2020년 초)의 논의내용과 연구방법을 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 22(2), pp.75~104 (2020), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 이준호, "포스트에디팅 교육을 위한 포스트에디팅과 인간번역의 차이 연구", 통역과 번역, 20(1), pp.73~96 (2018), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 이준호, "한영 포스트에디팅, 누구나 수행할 수 있는가?: 포스트에디팅 수업 설계를 위한 예비 연구", 번역학연구, 22(1), pp.171~198 (2021), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이준호, "영한 포스트에디팅 생산성에 대한 고찰- 시간적 노력을 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 25(2), pp.55~83 (2021), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 임희주, "교양영어 수업에서 영어자동번역기 사용에 대한 대학생의 인식 및 태도연구 ― 영작문 수업을 중심으로", 교양교육연구, 11(6), pp.727~751 (2017), 한국교양교육학회
- 조인희, "기계번역을 활용한 영어작문 수업의 효과: 자기 효능감과 글쓰기의 양적 증가를 중심으로", 영어영문학연구, 60(2), pp.253~279 (2018), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
- 조인희, "EFL 대학 작문 수업에서 기계번역 활용의학습 효과", 언어학 연구, (58), pp.385~416 (2021), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- 최문선, "국내 번역학 기계번역 연구 동향:내용 분석과 키워드 분석을 중심으로", 언어학연구, 24(1), pp.275~297 (2019), 한국언어연구학회[DOI]
- 한현희, "한노 기계번역의 오류 유형화 및 품질 개선을 위한 프리에디팅(pre-editing) 규칙 제안", 통번역학연구, 23(3), pp.291~327 (2019), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 한현희, "노한 기계번역의 프리에디팅(pre-editing) 및 포스트에디팅(post-editing) 가이드라인 제안", 노어노문학, 31(4), pp.65~96 (2019), 한국노어노문학회
- 안수진, "Students’ Perceptions of the Use of Online Machine Translation in L2 Writing", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 23(2), pp.10~35 (2020), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
- Bahri, H., "Google Translate as a supplementary tool for learning Malay : A case study at Universiti Sains Malaysia", Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(3), pp.161~167 (2016)
- Briggs, N., "Neural machine translation tools in the language learning classroom: Students’ use, perceptions, and analyses", The JALT CALL Journal, 14(1), pp.2~24 (2018)
- Carl, M., "Psycholinguistic and cognitive inquiries into translation and interpreting", pp.145~174 (2015), John Benjamins
- Doherty, S., "Human issues in translation technology", pp.131~148 (2017), Routledge
- Fiederer, R., "Quality and machine translation: A realistic objective?", The Journal of Specialised Translation, 11, pp.52~74 (2009)
- Flanagan, M., "Testing post-editing guidelines : How translation trainees interpret them and how to tailor them for translator training purposes", The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 8(2), pp.257~275 (2014)
- Garcia, I, "Is machine translation ready yet?", Target, 22(1), pp.7~21 (2010)
- Garcia, I., "Machine translation-assisted language learning : Writing for beginners", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), pp.471~487 (2011)
- Groves, M., "Friend or foe? Google Translate in language for academic purposes", English for Specific Purposes, 37, pp.112~121 (2015)
- Guerberof A., "Correlations between productivity and quality when post-editing in a professional context", Machine Translation, 28(3-4), pp.165~186 (2014)
- Guerberof A., "Machine translation and post-editing training as part of a master’s programme", The Journal of Specialised Translation, 31, pp.217~238 (2019)
- Haque, R., "Analysing terminology translation errors in statistical and neural machine translation", Machine Translation, 34(2), pp.149~195 (2020)
- Hu, K., "A comparative study of post-editing guidelines", Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 4(2), pp.346~353 (2016)
- Koponen, M., "Is machine translation post-editing worth the effort? A survey of research into post-editing and effort", The Journal of Specialised Translation, 25, pp.131~148 (2016)
- Lai, T., "Comparisons of four translation assessment scales", Compilation and Translation Review, 1(1), pp.71~92 (2008)
- 이일재, "A Quality Comparison of English Translations of Korean Literature between Human Translation and Post-Editing", The International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology, 6(4), pp.165~171 (2018), 국제문화기술진흥원[DOI]
- Lee, T., "Translation in language teaching and assessment", pp.3~22 (2013), Cambridge Scholars Publishing
- Mossop, B., "Revising and editing for translators" (2007), St. Jerome.
- O’Brien, S., "Teaching post-editing: A proposal for course content", Proceedings of the 6th EAMT Workshop on Teaching Machine Translation, pp.99~106 (2002)
- Plitt, M., "A productivity test of statistical machine translation post-editing in a typical localisation context", The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 93, pp.7~16 (2010)
- Tezcan, A., "Estimating post-editing time using a gold-standard set of machine translation errors", Computer Speech & Language, 55, pp.120~144 (2019)
- Tsai, S., "Using Google Translate in EFL drafts: A preliminary investigation", Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5-6), pp.510~526 (2019)
- "번역, 인간의 일? 기계의 일?" (2021)[URL]