법률 특화 번역엔진 성능 평가 - 한영 계약서 번역을 중심으로 -
A Study on Performance Evaluation of an Specialized Machine Translation Engine in the Legal Domain: Focusing on the Korean-to-English translation
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to examine the possibility to enhance the performance of a machine translation engine in Korean-to-English legal translation. With the rise of neural machine translation, translation scholars quickly responded to investigate the output and limitations of machine translation. However, there has been little research to date on enhancing the quality of raw machine translation itself. As the legal field generates vast demand for machine translation post-editing, any improvement in machine translation engine performance can be of significant contribution. Hence, this paper will introduce an experimental machine translation engine trained with a bilingual legal corpus and verify whether it is possible to create a domain-specific engine that can outperform a freely available general purpose translation service. To that end, the output from the experimental engine and Google Translate will be compared and analyzed in terms of accuracy, fluency, usability, and essential changes. Last but not least, this paper will examine the potential contribution that translators can make and areas of collaboration between translation scholars and translation engine developers. (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Korea)
Abstract
This study aims to examine the possibility to enhance the performance of a machine translation engine in Korean-to-English legal translation. With the rise of neural machine translation, translation scholars quickly responded to investigate the output and limitations of machine translation. However, there has been little research to date on enhancing the quality of raw machine translation itself. As the legal field generates vast demand for machine translation post-editing, any improvement in machine translation engine performance can be of significant contribution. Hence, this paper will introduce an experimental machine translation engine trained with a bilingual legal corpus and verify whether it is possible to create a domain-specific engine that can outperform a freely available general purpose translation service. To that end, the output from the experimental engine and Google Translate will be compared and analyzed in terms of accuracy, fluency, usability, and essential changes. Last but not least, this paper will examine the potential contribution that translators can make and areas of collaboration between translation scholars and translation engine developers. (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Korea)
참고문헌 (29)
- 강청웅, "숫자 기호화를 통한 신경기계번역 성능 향상", 디지털콘텐츠학회논문지, 19(6), pp.1161~1167 (2018), 한국디지털콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- 김순미, "번역학계와 언어서비스업체(LSP)간 산학협력연구: ‘포스트에디팅 생산성’과 ‘기계번역 엔진 성능 비교’", 번역학연구, 20(1), pp.41~76 (2019), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 박찬준, "인공신경망 기계번역에서 말뭉치 간의 균형성을 고려한 성능 향상 연구", 한국융합학회논문지, 12(5), pp.23~29 (2021), 한국융합학회[DOI]
- 박찬준, "Coronavirus Disease-19(COVID-19)에 특화된 인공신경망 기계번역기", 한국융합학회논문지, 11(9), pp.7~13 (2020), 한국융합학회[DOI]
- 박찬준, "공공 한영 병렬 말뭉치를 이용한 기계번역 성능 향상 연구", 디지털융복합연구, 18(6), pp.271~277 (2020), 한국디지털정책학회[DOI]
- 서보현, "기계번역 결과물의 오류유형 고찰", 번역학연구, 19(1), pp.99~117 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 신지선, "기계번역 포스트에디팅에 관한 해외 연구 동향", 번역학연구, 21(4), pp.87~114 (2020), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 윤미선, "영어-한국어 언어쌍에 적합한 포스트에디팅 가이드라인: 미래 포스트에디터를 위한 가이드라인과 그 실례", 번역학연구, 19(5), pp.43~76 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이상빈, "국내학부 번역전공자의 구글 기계번역 포스트에디팅 과정(process) 및 행위 연구", 번역학연구, 19(3), pp.259~286 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이상빈, "기계번역에 관한 KCI 연구논문 리뷰: 인문학 저널 논문(2011∼2020년 초)의 논의내용과 연구방법을 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 22(2), pp.75~104 (2020), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 이준호, "문학번역 적용을 위한 기계번역의 현주소", 통번역학연구, 23(1), pp.143~167 (2019), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 이준호, "신경망기계번역의 객관적 평가를 위한 예비연구: 자동평가와 수동평가의 균형점", 통번역학연구, 23(3), pp.171~202 (2019), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 정혜연, "번역의 자동평가: 기계번역 평가를 인간번역 평가에 적용해보기", 통번역학연구, 22(4), pp.265~287 (2018), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 최문선, "국내 번역학 기계번역 연구 동향:내용 분석과 키워드 분석을 중심으로", 언어학연구, 24(1), pp.275~297 (2019), 한국언어연구학회[DOI]
- 최승권, "영어 특허문서 자동번역을 위한 특허번역패턴 연구", 번역학연구, 8(1), pp.301~322 (2007), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 최승권, "번역 말뭉치로부터 추출한 어휘 번역 패턴의 의미 분류와 자동번역시스템에의 활용", 번역학연구, 11(3), pp.277~301 (2010), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 최승권, "제한된 도메인에 특화된 기계번역 기술 개발-특허 전문 영한 번역기를 중심으로", 한국정보처리학회 학술대회 발표논문 (2007)
- Bhatia, V. K., "Benjamins Translation Library 26", pp.203~216 (1997), John Benjamins
- Bentivogli, L., "Neural versus phrase-based machine translation quality: a case study", The 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Proceedings (2016)
- de Almeida, G., "Translating the Post-editor: An Investigation of Post-editing Changes and Correlations with Professional Experience across Two Romance Languages", PhD, pp.2013
- Harvey, M., "What's so special about legal translation?", Meta : Translators’ Journal, 47(2), pp.177~185 (2002)
- Koponen, M., "Comparing human perceptions of post-editing effort with post-editing operations", The 7th Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation Proceedings (2012)
- Luong, M. T., "Addressing the rare word problem in neural machine translation", The 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing Proceedings (2014)
- Müller, M., "Domain robustness in neural machine translation", The 14th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas Proceedings (2019)
- Vaswani, A., "Attention is all you need", The 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Proceedings (2017)
- Wang, X., "Domain-specific machine translation with recurrent neural network for software localization", Empirical Software Engineering, 24(6), pp.3514~3545 (2019)
- Wu, Y., "Google's neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation", arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08144, ~ (2016)
- Zhang, X., "Curriculum learning for domain adaptation in neural machine translation", The 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies Proceedings (2019)
- "연 매출 2000~3000억 규모… ‘법률번역 시장’ 선점 경쟁" (2019)[URL]
