본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

반응적 교수법이 예비화학교사들의 증발과 끓음에 관한 수업설계 인식에 미친 영향

The Effect of Responsive Teaching Method on the Recognition of Pre-service Chemistry Teachers about Instructional Design related to Evaporation and Boiling

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류화학

초록

이 연구에서는 H대학교 화학교육과 예비교사들을 대상으로 반응적 교수법의 효과를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 토론을 학습자 생각의 본질 존중하기, 학습자 생각에서 학문적 연결 관계 인식하기, 학습자 생각의 본질 확장하기의 3단계로 구 성하였다. 학습자 생각의 본질 존중하기 단계에서는 예비교사 20명을 대상으로 실시한 설문지를 분석하여 증발과 끓음에 관련 된 예비교사들의 생각의 본질을 파악하였다. 이 중에서 5명의 예비교사를 선발하여 자신의 생각과 학문적 연결 관계를 인식하 도록 하였다. 이러한 단계를 통해 예비교사들은 증발과 끓음에 대한 자신들의 생각의 본질을 파악하였으며, 이러한 생각의 본질을 학문적으로 연결하여 사고의 프레임을 수정하거나 확장하는 과정을 경험하였다. 또한 예비교사 스스로 자신의 개념이 역동적인 변화하는 과정을 직접 체험함으로써 반응적 교수법의 효과를 인식하였다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of responsive teaching method for pre-service teachers in Chemistry Education Department of H University. We designed three steps for the discussions: foregrounding the substance of learners’ ideas, recognizing the disciplinary connections within learners’ ideas, taking up and pursing the substance of thinking. In the step of foregrounding the substance of learners’ ideas, we analyzed the questionnaires conducted by the 20 pre-service teachers to understand the nature of their ideas about evaporation and boiling. Among them, five pre-service teachers were selected to recognize the disciplinary connections within learners’ ideas. Through these steps, the pre-service teachers have grasped the nature of their thinking about evaporation and boiling, and have experienced the process of modifying or expanding the frames of thought by the disciplinary connections within learners’ ideas. In addition, the pre-service teachers directly perceived the effect of the responsive teaching method by experiencing dynamic changes of their conceptions.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. National Research Council, "A framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas" (2012), National Academies Press
  2. Watkins, J., , Sci. Ed, 102, pp.548~ (2018)
  3. Ball, D L., , Elem. School J, 93, pp.373~ (1993)
  4. Hammer, D, , Cogn. Instr, 15, pp.485~ (1997)
  5. Colestck, A A., "Responsive Teaching in Science and Mathematics", pp.126~144 (2016), Routledge
  6. Harrer, B W., , Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res, 9, pp.023101~ (2013)
  7. Hammer, D, "Seeing the Science in Children’s Thinking: Case Studies of Student Inquiry in Physical Science" (2012), Heinemann
  8. Radoff J., "Responsive Teaching in Science and Mathematics", pp.189~202 (2016), Routledge
  9. Lineback, J E., , J. Learning Sci, 1 (2014)
  10. Levin, D M., , J. Teach. Educ, 60, pp.142~ (2009)
  11. Maskiewicz, A C., , Paper Presented at the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (2010)
  12. Brodie, K, , Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, pp.174~ (2011)
  13. Carpenter, T P., "Cognitively Guided Instruction: A Researchbased Teacher Professional Development Program for Elementary School Mathematics", Wisconsin Center for Education Research: University of Wisconsin, ~ (2000)
  14. Coffey, J E., , J. Res. Sci. Teach, 48, pp.1109~ (2011)
  15. Duckworth, E, "The Having of Wonderful Ideas and Other Essays on Teaching and Learning" (2006), Teachers College Press
  16. Gallas, K, "Talking Their Way into Science: Hearing Children’s Questions and Theories, Responding with Curricula" (1995), Teachers College Press
  17. Hammer, D., , Re. S M ICT E, 6, pp.51~ (2012)
  18. Russ, R S., , Sci. Educ, pp.875~ (2009)
  19. Chazan, D., , For the Learning of Mathathics, 19, pp.2~ (1999)
  20. Sherin, M G., "Mathematics Teacher Noticing: Seeing Through Teachers’ Eyes" (2011), Routledge
  21. Lau, M, "Understanding the dynamics of teacher attention:Examples of how high school physics and physical science teachers attend to student ideas", doctoral, pp.2010
  22. Wallach, T., , J. Math. Teacher Educ, 8, pp.393~ (2005)
  23. Hutchison, P., , Sci. Ed, 94, pp.506~ (2010)
  24. Levin, D M., "What secondary science teachers pay attention to in the classroom: Situating teaching in institutional and social systems", Doctoral, pp.2008
  25. Colestock, A, , Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (2010)
  26. Levin, D M., "Becoming a Responsive Science Teacher: Focusing on Student Thinking in Secondary Science" (2012), National Science Teachers Association Press
  27. Pierson, J L., "The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning", Doctoral, pp.2008
  28. Jacobs, V R., , J. Res. Math. Educ, 38, pp.258~ (2007)
  29. Jacobs, V R., , J. Res. Math. Educ, 41, pp.169~ (2010)
  30. Sherin, M G., , J. Technology and Teacher Educ, 13, pp.475~ (2005)
  31. Sherin, M G., , J. Teac. Educ, 60, pp.20~ (2009)
  32. van Es, E A., , Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, pp.244~ (2008)
  33. van Es, E A., , J. Math. Teacher Educ, 13, pp.155~ (2010)
  34. Maskiewicz, A C., , J. Res. Sci. Teach, 49, pp.429~ (2012)
  35. Michaels, S, , Human Development, 48, pp.136~ (2005)
  36. Bresser, R, "Becoming scientists: Inquiry-based teaching in Diverse Classrooms" (2013), Stenhouse Publishers
  37. Richards, J, "Exploring what stabilizes teachers’ attention and responsiveness to the substance of students’ scientific thinking in the classroom", Doctoral, pp.2013
  38. Philipp, R A., , Int. J. Educ. Res, 37, pp.195~ (2002)
  39. Rosebery, A S, "Boats, Balloons and Classroom Video: Science Teaching as Inquiry" (1998), Heinemann

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)