본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Prosodic licensing in Korean wh-questions: De-phrasing and pitch reduction

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper discusses the prosody of Korean wh-questions and prosodic grouping accompanied by de-phrasing and pitch reduction. Our findings show that Jun and Oh’s (1996) observation on the wh-phrasing needs to be clarified. While they proposed a phonological condition of a wh-word forming an AP with the following word, Experiment 1 reveals wh-elements tend to be grouped with an IP boundary, ignoring any elements situated between them. Experiment 2 further clarifies that, instead of just an IP boundary, Korean wh-phrasing actually reacts to the Q-features. This can be inferred from the empirical data showing that the embedded C head of that-clause is prosodically not realized while that of if-clause is realized. Specifically, the elements between the wh-element and its licensor are prosodically reduced/deleted, indicating a possible prosodic grouping in Seoul Korean wh-questions. To explain this phenomenon, we adopt Richards’ (2016) Generalized Contiguity Theory and its notion of agreeing/selecting elements being dominated by a single prosodic node. We propose that in Korean, wh-element must also agree with its licensor by forming a unified prosodic unit, which we term Basin formation.

Abstract

This paper discusses the prosody of Korean wh-questions and prosodic grouping accompanied by de-phrasing and pitch reduction. Our findings show that Jun and Oh’s (1996) observation on the wh-phrasing needs to be clarified. While they proposed a phonological condition of a wh-word forming an AP with the following word, Experiment 1 reveals wh-elements tend to be grouped with an IP boundary, ignoring any elements situated between them. Experiment 2 further clarifies that, instead of just an IP boundary, Korean wh-phrasing actually reacts to the Q-features. This can be inferred from the empirical data showing that the embedded C head of that-clause is prosodically not realized while that of if-clause is realized. Specifically, the elements between the wh-element and its licensor are prosodically reduced/deleted, indicating a possible prosodic grouping in Seoul Korean wh-questions. To explain this phenomenon, we adopt Richards’ (2016) Generalized Contiguity Theory and its notion of agreeing/selecting elements being dominated by a single prosodic node. We propose that in Korean, wh-element must also agree with its licensor by forming a unified prosodic unit, which we term Basin formation.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Branan, Kenyon Garrett, "Relationship preservation", PhD, pp.2018
  2. Breiss, Canaan, "Phonological markedness effects in sentence formation", Language, 96(2), pp.338~370 (2020)
  3. Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), The MIT Press
  4. Compton, Richard, "Word-formation by phase in Inuit", Lingua, 120(9), pp.2167~2192 (2010)
  5. Deguchi, Masanori, "Prosody and wh-questions", Proceedings of North East Linguistics Society, 32, pp.73~92 (2002)
  6. Elfner, Emily, "Recursion in prosodic phrasing : Evidence from Connemara Irish", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33(4), pp.1169~1208 (2015)
  7. Jun, Sun-Ah, "The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody", PhD, pp.1993
  8. Jun, Sun-Ah, "The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy", Phonology, 15(2), pp.189~226 (1998)
  9. Jun, Sun-Ah, "K-Tobi (Korean ToBI) labelling conventions", Speech Sciences, 7(1), pp.162~188 (2000)
  10. Jun, Sun-Ah, "A prosodic analysis of three types of wh-phrases in Korean", Language and Speech, 39(1), pp.37~61 (1996)
  11. 정연진, "On the Nature of Wh-Prosody and Its Syntactic Dependency", 언어, 37(2), pp.417~444 (2012), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  12. 정연진, "On the Syntactic Grounding of the Prosodic Interpretation of Wh-questions", 생성문법연구, 24(1), pp.105~132 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  13. Kawahara, Shigeto, "Assessing the prosodic licensing of wh-in-situ in Japanese: A computational-experimental approach", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 40, pp.103~122 (2022)
  14. Kratzer, Angelika, "Phase theory and prosodic spellout : The case of verbs", The Linguistic Review, 24(1), pp.93~135 (2007)
  15. Lee, Chung-hoon, "Proceedings of the 22nd Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar", Proceedings of the 22nd Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar (2020), Gyeongsang National University
  16. Newell, Heather, "Interactions at the syntax-phonology interface: Evidence from Ojibwe", Lingua, 150, pp.332~362 (2014)
  17. Newell, Heather, "The structure of words at the interfaces" (2017), Oxford University Press
  18. Richards, Norvin, "Uttering trees" (2010), The MIT Press
  19. Richards, Norvin, "Contiguity theory" (2016), The MIT Press
  20. Richards, Norvin, "Contiguity-prominence: A prosodic parameter with syntactic consequences", Presented at the Forty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society (2018), Cornell University
  21. Selkirk, Elisabeth, "On clause and intonational phrase in Japanese: The syntactic of prosodic constituent structure", Gengo Kenkyui, 136, pp.35~75 (2009)
  22. Selkirk, Elisabeth, "The handbook of phonological theory", pp.435~484 (2011), Wiley-Blackwell
  23. complementizers drive phonological phrasing in Fukuoka Japanese, "Natural Language and Linguistic Theory", 2011, 545~559
  24. Weber, Natalie, "Syntax, prosody, and metrical structure in Blackfoot", PhD, pp.2020

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)