가족주의 가치를 공유한 국가들의 입양법 국제비교에 관한 연구
A Comparative Study of Adoption Laws for Countries with Familistic Values
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzed the adoption laws of countries with familistic values. Four countries (Italy, Spain, India, and Ireland) that South Korea shares common values with were selected for comparison. The adoption laws of these countries related to domestic adoption were analyzed in terms of adoptable children, the eligibility of the adoptive parent(s), the consent for adoption by the birth parent(s), and the adoption process (adoption arrangements and adoption orders). After analyzing the adoption laws of each country, the specific items which reflect familistic values in adoption laws were discussed related to the implications for Korean adoption practices. Based on the results of the study, suggestions for a new adoption law system which adheres to the principle of the “best interests of the child” and also reflects the reality of adoption practices in Korea were given. Also, by sharing the experiences of these counties, adoption practices in Korea could be improved upon.
Abstract
This study analyzed the adoption laws of countries with familistic values. Four countries (Italy, Spain, India, and Ireland) that South Korea shares common values with were selected for comparison. The adoption laws of these countries related to domestic adoption were analyzed in terms of adoptable children, the eligibility of the adoptive parent(s), the consent for adoption by the birth parent(s), and the adoption process (adoption arrangements and adoption orders). After analyzing the adoption laws of each country, the specific items which reflect familistic values in adoption laws were discussed related to the implications for Korean adoption practices. Based on the results of the study, suggestions for a new adoption law system which adheres to the principle of the “best interests of the child” and also reflects the reality of adoption practices in Korea were given. Also, by sharing the experiences of these counties, adoption practices in Korea could be improved upon.
참고문헌 (30)
- 안재진, "국내법에 나타난 입양제도의 변천과정 분석: 아동권리의 관점에서", 한국가족복지학, 16(4), pp.71~95 (2011), 한국가족복지학회
- 장복희, "헤이그 국제아동입양 협약과 주요국 입양법에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 23, pp.373~401 (2010), 법학연구소
- 최진섭, "개방입양의 법제화를 위한 연구", 법학연구, 15(2), pp.261~292 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- Chung, K. S., "A study on American adoption law", Journal of Law research, 19, pp.43~66 (2004)
- 정연택, "남유럽과 동아시아의 가족 및 성역할 태도와 상황 비교 연구", 사회복지연구, (38), pp.61~91 (2008), 한국사회복지연구회[DOI]
- Frank, R., "Volladoption oder einfache Adoption? translated by Kim, S. Y. (2002). Full adoption – the only alternative for the well-being of adopted child", Busan National University Law Review, 43(1), pp.345~351 (2002)
- Hernon, M., "Adoption in Japan: The Children Left Behind", Tokyo Weekender, ~ (2015)
- 홍창우, "민법상 親養子 제도에 관하여", 인권과 정의, (381), pp.41~64 (2008), 대한변호사협회
- Hyun, S. H., "Changing child welfare in Korea according to joining in the Hague convention on protection of children and co-operation in respect of inter-country adoption and amendment to adoption law in Korea", 2015 Spring Korean Society of Child Welfare Conference, pp.37~57 (2015)
- "Italian Adoption Law" (2007)[URL]
- 김효진, "국내외 입양 관련 법률 체계와 내용에 관한 비교연구 －한국, 일본, 노르웨이, 스웨덴, 영국을 중심으로－", 한국아동복지학, (34), pp.127~153 (2011), 한국아동복지학회[DOI]
- Kim, J. S., "The law of domestic relation and succession" (2008), Bupmoonsa
- 김미경, "프랑스의 완전양자제도", 비교사법, 17(2), pp.1~34 (2010), 한국비교사법학회
- 김상용, "개정 양자법 해설", 법조, 61(5), pp.5~52 (2012), 법조협회[DOI]
- 김상용, "양자법의 문제점과 개정방향 - 민법상의 쟁점을 중심으로 -", 법조, 58(5), pp.38~78 (2009), 법조협회
- Issues and policy proposal on domestic adoption in Korea, "Kim, Y. K.", The Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, ~ (2010)
- 고형석, "친양자제도에 관한 연구", 저스티스, 108, pp.54~74 (2008), 한국법학원
- "Act on special cases concerning adoption" (2011)[URL]
- Kukmin Ilbo, "500 Churches and Institutions Took the Lead for the Revision of ‘Act on Special Cases concerning Adoption’ to Save the Aborted and Abandoned Babies", ~ (2013)
- Lee, B. H., "A review on the introduction of a full adoption system", The Journal of Comparative Private Law, 9(1), pp.225~254 (2002)
- 이병화, "입양아동의 국제적 보호", 국제법학회논총, 48(2), pp.5~164 (2003), 대한국제법학회
- Lyu, Y. G., "Gender regime and Korean family policy type", The Annual Korean Family Welfare Association Conference (2011)
- 박채복, "EU 젠더레짐의 형성 및 정책결정과정", 정치·정보연구, 16(1), pp.33~58 (2013), 한국정치정보학회
- Park, J. R., "A study on adoption policy in Korea – Analysis and evaluation of its formation process", master, pp.1994
- "Adoption laws in India: reviews and recommendation needed" (2013)[URL]
- "Spain Adoption Law"[URL]
- Suk, K. H., "A study on the Hague convention protection of children and co-operation in respect of intercountry adoption", Ministry of Justice (2010)
- "The Adoption Authority of Ireland, 2013" (2013)[URL]
- 윤진숙, "현행 입양특례법에 대한 소고 - 미국 입양법과 비교를 통한 미혼모와 입양아의 인권 보호 -", 법학연구, 24(4), pp.159~184 (2014), 법학연구원