본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

2013년부터 2023년까지 외과계 진료과들의 검사 청구량 분석: 재출판본

Analysis of the Volume of Diagnostic Test Claims in Surgical Departments From 2013 to 2023: Secondary Publication

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류이비인후과학

초록

Background and Objectives The relative value scale (RVS) system in Korea categorizes medical services into five types: surgery, treatment, function tests, laboratory tests, and radio- logic examinations. This study aimed to compare changes that took place over the past decade in diagnostic test utilization and relative value unit distribution in the otolaryngology depart- ment compared to that in other surgical departments. Subjects and Method We analyzed the National Health Insurance claims data for all diag- nostic test items billed in 2013, 2018, and 2023. For each test item, we extracted its RVS point value and claim frequency across nine surgical specialties, stratified by institution type. We calculated the total number of test claims, total RVS-weighted test usage, and the average RVS points per test item by specialty. In addition, we assessed specialist-level intensity by calculat- ing the RVS-based test usage per board-certified physician in each specialty. Results From 2013 to 2023, all surgical departments showed an increase in test claims. Gen- eral surgery, orthopedics, and ophthalmology had the highest total claim volumes. While most tests were performed in neurosurgery, thoracic surgery, and urology in tertiary/general hospi- tals, diagnostic testing in ophthalmology remained concentrated in smaller hospitals and clin- ics. In otolaryngology, a minimal growth in test claims was noted in high-level institutions while a marked increase in test claims came from clinics and hospitals. Also observed was relatively low test usage per physician in the otolaryngology sector. By 2023, the average RVS points per test item remained lowest in orthopedics, plastic surgery, and ophthalmology, while thoracic surgery and otolaryngology maintained higher averages. Conclusion The relatively low per-physician test usage in otolaryngology—despite the high average RVS values—may indicate limitations in test scalability and institutional practice en-vironments.

Abstract

Background and Objectives The relative value scale (RVS) system in Korea categorizes medical services into five types: surgery, treatment, function tests, laboratory tests, and radio- logic examinations. This study aimed to compare changes that took place over the past decade in diagnostic test utilization and relative value unit distribution in the otolaryngology depart- ment compared to that in other surgical departments. Subjects and Method We analyzed the National Health Insurance claims data for all diag- nostic test items billed in 2013, 2018, and 2023. For each test item, we extracted its RVS point value and claim frequency across nine surgical specialties, stratified by institution type. We calculated the total number of test claims, total RVS-weighted test usage, and the average RVS points per test item by specialty. In addition, we assessed specialist-level intensity by calculat- ing the RVS-based test usage per board-certified physician in each specialty. Results From 2013 to 2023, all surgical departments showed an increase in test claims. Gen- eral surgery, orthopedics, and ophthalmology had the highest total claim volumes. While most tests were performed in neurosurgery, thoracic surgery, and urology in tertiary/general hospi- tals, diagnostic testing in ophthalmology remained concentrated in smaller hospitals and clin- ics. In otolaryngology, a minimal growth in test claims was noted in high-level institutions while a marked increase in test claims came from clinics and hospitals. Also observed was relatively low test usage per physician in the otolaryngology sector. By 2023, the average RVS points per test item remained lowest in orthopedics, plastic surgery, and ophthalmology, while thoracic surgery and otolaryngology maintained higher averages. Conclusion The relatively low per-physician test usage in otolaryngology—despite the high average RVS values—may indicate limitations in test scalability and institutional practice en-vironments.

관련 논문AI추천

최근 18년간 외과계 수술 및 처치 행위 항목 상대가치점수와 시행 빈도 변화 분석: 재출판본문석균, 박찬순, 이세영, 이승훈, 장정현, 조재훈대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2025 · 제68권 제2호국민건강보험공단 데이터베이스를 이용한 국내 이비인후과 수술 전 검사 현황 분석김정하, 박성준, 이세영, 장정현, 전성연, 정효진대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2022 · 제65권 제9호건강보험 심사평가원 자료로 본 Diagnosis Related Group 시행 후 편도적출수술 청구 비용의 변화 평가김진평, 박정제, 우승훈, 원성준, 이형주, 임채동대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2016 · 제59권 제9호이비인후-두경부외과 관점에서 본 ‘의료개혁 1차 실행방안’의 고려 사항김계현, 문석균, 윤지민대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2025 · 제68권 제5호건강보험심사평가원 보건의료빅데이터개방시스템을 활용한 코로나-19 유행 전‧후의 이과 질환 진료 변화 분석공수근, 김석현, 엄태웅, 오세준, 이일우, 이현민대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회 · 임상이비인후과2024 · 제35권 제2호Assessing Hospital Surgical Functions in Korea: A Functional Analysis Using the Disease Control Priorities, 3rd Edition Essential Surgery List (2013-2022)김진환, Bai Haibin, Park Yukyung대한예방의학회 · 예방의학회지2025 · 제58권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)