본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

건강보험 심사평가원 자료로 본 Diagnosis Related Group 시행 후 편도적출수술 청구 비용의 변화 평가

The Analysis of Changes of Tonsillectomy after Diagnosis Related Group Based Payment System: Review of the Data Given by the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류이비인후과학

초록

Background and Objectives Diagnosis by Related Groups (DRG), a system forcibly implemented in all medical institutions from July 2013, was applied to tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in the field of Otorhinolaryngology. We analyzed the changes in medical costs and evaluated the efficiency of the DRG system by analyzing the data collected before and after the DRG implementation. Materials and Method We analyzed the total number of cases, total medical costs and per charge for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy using the data from the Korean National Health Insurance from 2011 to 2014. We compared the number and cost of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy by hospital type, region, and patient age. Results The total number of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy after the application of DRG systems in July 2013 in all medical institutions was reduced, but the total costs showed a tendancy to increase, resulting in an increase per charge of case. The number of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy was decreased in general and specialized hospitals, but the costs were increased after DRG systems. Conclusion Medical costs per charge of case related to tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy was higher in the DRG system than in the ‘fee for service’ system. Increased medical costs, considered to be the most likely cause of patient copayments, are recognized in the DRG system. The results showed that saving effect of medical costs was not significant in the DRG system; it may appear to relieve patient burden in the short term, but the financial state of national health insurance is worsening. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2016;59(9):661-7

Abstract

Background and Objectives Diagnosis by Related Groups (DRG), a system forcibly implemented in all medical institutions from July 2013, was applied to tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in the field of Otorhinolaryngology. We analyzed the changes in medical costs and evaluated the efficiency of the DRG system by analyzing the data collected before and after the DRG implementation. Materials and Method We analyzed the total number of cases, total medical costs and per charge for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy using the data from the Korean National Health Insurance from 2011 to 2014. We compared the number and cost of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy by hospital type, region, and patient age. Results The total number of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy after the application of DRG systems in July 2013 in all medical institutions was reduced, but the total costs showed a tendancy to increase, resulting in an increase per charge of case. The number of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy was decreased in general and specialized hospitals, but the costs were increased after DRG systems. Conclusion Medical costs per charge of case related to tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy was higher in the DRG system than in the ‘fee for service’ system. Increased medical costs, considered to be the most likely cause of patient copayments, are recognized in the DRG system. The results showed that saving effect of medical costs was not significant in the DRG system; it may appear to relieve patient burden in the short term, but the financial state of national health insurance is worsening. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2016;59(9):661-7

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Park BW, "A Study on the noncompliance of D.R.G", pp.2013
  2. Chung EY, "Impact of Mandatory DRG payment system on Medical cost and Length of Stay", pp.2014
  3. OECD, "OECD Review of Health Care Quality: Korea-Raising Standards" (2013), OECD publishing
  4. Burns LR, "The effects of patient, hospital, and physician characteristics on length of stay and mortality", Med Care, 29(3), pp.251~271 (1991)
  5. Rogers WH, "Quality of care before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. A summary of effects", JAMA, 264(15), pp.1989~1994 (1990)
  6. Siess M, "Effects of the DRG-based payment system. What action requirement exists for the surgeon?", Chirurg, 72(2), pp.30~35 (2001)
  7. Campbell PM, "A study and analysis of Medicare diagnosis related group (DRG) prices and implications for manufacturers" (1984), Health Industry Manufacturers Association
  8. Carter GM, "How much change in the case mix index is DRG creep?", J Health Econ, 9(4), pp.411~428 (1990)
  9. Fitzgerald JF, "Changing patterns of hip fracture care before and after implementation of the prospective payment system", JAMA, 258(2), pp.218~221 (1987)
  10. Kahn KL, "Comparing outcomes of care before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system", JAMA, 264(15), pp.1984~1988 (1990)
  11. Kahn KL, "Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system", JAMA, 264(15), pp.1969~1973 (1990)
  12. Feinglass J, "The initial impact of the Medicare prospective payment system on U.S. health care: a review of the literature", Med Care Rev, 48(1), pp.91~115 (1991)
  13. Analysis of changes in Medicare, Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) weights, discharges, and rates from fiscal year 1985 to fiscal year 1986, "Health Industry Manufacturers Association", Health Industry Manufacturers Association, 33~ (1985)
  14. Klein-Hitpaß U, "Policy trends and reforms in the German DRG-based hospital payment system", Health Policy, 119(3), pp.252~257 (2015)
  15. Rau F, "Introduction of the DRG system in Germany: objectives, problems and perspectives on the basis of a lump sum payment from the perspective of the Federal Ministry of Health", Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich, 96(8), pp.498~504 (2002)
  16. Idezuki Y, "Introduction of new payment system (DRG", PPS) to university hospitals, 2003, pp.104(3), 312~319
  17. Sakurai RY, "Pilot trial of the Diagnosis Related Group and Prospective Payment System (DRG-PPS) in japan. No. 14, in series of articles:controversy and reform proposals concerning insured medical care in neurosurgery", No Shinkei Geka, 31(3), pp.339~342 (2003)
  18. Korea health industry development institute, "DRG payment systemt Q&A sourse", Korea Health Industry Development Institute, ~ (2001)
  19. Insurance policy survey center. DRG management, "Jeong HJ", National Health Insurance Service Health. Insurance Policy Survey Center, ~ (2012)
  20. Seven diseases DRG development plan survey, "Kang GW", Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, 31~48 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

의료원가분석을 통한 편도 및 아데노이드 절제술의 경제적 적정성 연구김창용, 장정현, 정세원, 최현승대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2015 · 제58권 제9호최근 18년간 외과계 수술 및 처치 행위 항목 상대가치점수와 시행 빈도 변화 분석: 재출판본문석균, 박찬순, 이세영, 이승훈, 장정현, 조재훈대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2025 · 제68권 제2호이비인후-두경부외과 관점에서 본 ‘의료개혁 1차 실행방안’의 고려 사항김계현, 문석균, 윤지민대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2025 · 제68권 제5호국민건강보험공단 데이터베이스를 이용한 국내 이비인후과 수술 전 검사 현황 분석김정하, 박성준, 이세영, 장정현, 전성연, 정효진대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2022 · 제65권 제9호수면호흡장애와 관련한 편도 절제술 적응증의 변화구수권, 김양재, 김영중, 박홍석, 최장원대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회 · 임상이비인후과2012 · 제23권 제1호시계열 분석을 통한 7개질병군 포괄수가제의 환자 비용 변화 분석 -의료기관의 유형별 특성을 중심으로-윤혜지, 이창민보건의료산업학회 · 보건의료산업학회지2017 · 제11권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)