AHP 기법을 이용한 하천 친수공간 평가항목 중요도 분석 연구– 경기도 경안천을 중심으로 -
A Study on Analysis of Importance Weights of Riverfront Assessment Items Using Analytic Hierarchy Process- Focused on the Gyeong-An Stream in Gyeonggi Province -
1
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
he purposes of this study are to identify assessment items to evaluate riverfront for amenity and recreation and to analyze the relative importance of the items using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). Total 15 items of 5 categories were identified through literature review and panel discussion. Based on the AHP analysis results, a weighted value was set for each of the layers in the hierachy. ‘Ecological Characteristics’ (0.333) was rated with the highest weighted value. followed by ‘Landscape Characteristics’(0.190) and ‘Physical Characteristics’(0.166). Among the assessment items, ‘Water Quality’ (0.152) and ‘River Naturality’(0.118) had higher weighted values. With the set of assessment items field assessments were carried out for Gyung-An Stream of Gyeonggi-Do to exam its applicability. Total 6 segments and 31 reaches out of the 22.5 km long river were evaluated and the mean scores of the five categories were converted into a percentile score for comparison. Overall, the segments which had higher scores were located close to neighborhood areas and had better connections with other historical and cultural amenities. Also, existing facilities was an important factor and needs to be considered for waterfront development.
Abstract
he purposes of this study are to identify assessment items to evaluate riverfront for amenity and recreation and to analyze the relative importance of the items using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). Total 15 items of 5 categories were identified through literature review and panel discussion. Based on the AHP analysis results, a weighted value was set for each of the layers in the hierachy. ‘Ecological Characteristics’ (0.333) was rated with the highest weighted value. followed by ‘Landscape Characteristics’(0.190) and ‘Physical Characteristics’(0.166). Among the assessment items, ‘Water Quality’ (0.152) and ‘River Naturality’(0.118) had higher weighted values. With the set of assessment items field assessments were carried out for Gyung-An Stream of Gyeonggi-Do to exam its applicability. Total 6 segments and 31 reaches out of the 22.5 km long river were evaluated and the mean scores of the five categories were converted into a percentile score for comparison. Overall, the segments which had higher scores were located close to neighborhood areas and had better connections with other historical and cultural amenities. Also, existing facilities was an important factor and needs to be considered for waterfront development.
참고문헌 (25)
- "광주시 통계정보시스템"[URL]
- 경안천 하천기본계획(변경)보고서, "국토교통부", ~ (2011)
- 김병찬, "다기준의사결정을 이용한 친수공간 이용지수 분석", 한국수자원학회2011 학술대회논문집, pp.195~ (2011)
- 김성만, "다기준의사결정법(CP)을 이용한 도심 친수공간 적지선정 방법개발", 박사, 환경공학과, pp.2012
- 변금옥, "하천 어메너티 유형복원 계획가이드", ECORIVER21, ~ (2011)
- 박봉진, "하천공간정비계획을 위한 하천구역구분과 기능공간배치 평가방법의 제안", 38(2), pp.78~88 (2005), 한국수자원학회
- 박성룡, "광주 도심내 친수공간 적지 선정 방법에 관한 연구", 석사, 환경공학, pp.2011
- 박창석, "하천과의 거리 및 수변구역 지정에 따른 경관특성 비교", 한국조경학회 추계학술대회 논문집, pp.71~75 (2009)
- 성연주, "도시하천의 이용지수개발", 한국콘텐츠학회 춘계 종합학술대회, pp.641~643 (2010)
- 변금옥, "하천복원모델 개발에 대하여:어메니티를 중심으로", 43(11), pp.106~112 (2010), 한국수자원학회
- 송주일, "도시하천의 복원과 관리를 위한 하천평가기법 개발", 대한토목학회 논문집B, 28(3B), pp.283~296 (2008), 대한토목학회
- 송주일, "하천공간관리를 위한 하천구역 구분 기법 연구", 국토연구, 59, pp.61~78 (2008), 국토연구원
- 송주일, "하천구역구분의 기준에 관한 연구", 대한토목학회 논문집B, 32(2), pp.131~137 (2012), 대한토목학회
- 오승현, "하천 어메니티 향상을 위한 계획기법에 관한 연구", 석사, 생태조경, pp.2010
- 양진우, "부산지역 해안 친수공간의 이용만족도 특성 및 영향요인에 관한 연구", 환경정책, 17(1), pp.5~24 (2009), 한국환경정책학회
- 전승훈, "한국형 하천환경 평가체계 정립을 위한 유형화 및 적용성 검토", 한국조경학회 춘계학술대회 논문집, pp.106~108 (2013)
- 정정채, "중소도시 하천의 친환경적활용 잠재력 평가에 관한 연구: 전남 순천시 하천을 사례로", 한국조경학회지, 69, pp.96~112 (1998)
- 조현주, "친수 휴양활동공간 계획을 위한 광역수준의 부지 적합성 평가", 한국조경학회지, 37(2), pp.1~13 (2009), 한국조경학회
- 최형선, "노인요양시설 평가지표 개발 및 적용에 관한 연구", 부동산학연구, 18(4), pp.131~147 (2012), 한국부동산분석학회
- 수생태계 건강성 및 조사평가, "환경부", ~ (2009)
- 하천자연도 평가기법 개발 및 적용방안 연구, "환경부", ~ (2010)
- "환경부 물환경정보시스템"[URL]
- Frissell, C. A., "A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context", Environmental Management, 10(2), pp.199~214 (1986)
- Fry, J., "Riparian evaluation and site assessment in arizona", Landscape Urban Planning, 28(2-3), pp.179~199 (1994)
- USDA, "Stream Visual Assessment Protocal", National water and climate center technical note, 99(1), pp.3~ (1998)