다중기기 취약도곡선의 지진상관계수 조합 절차
Combination Procedure for Seismic Correlation Coefficient in Fragility Curves of Multiple Components
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
For the important safety system, two or more units of identical equipment or redundant components with similar function were installed to prevent abnormal failure. If the failure probability of such equipment is independent, this redundancy could increase the system safety remarkably. However, if the failure of each component is highly correlated by installing in a structure or experiencing an earthquake event, the expected redundancy effect will decrease. Therefore, the seismic correlation of the equipment should be evaluated quantitatively for the seismic probabilistic safety assessment. The correlation effect can be explained in the procedure of constructing fragility curves. In this study, several methodologies to quantify the seismic correlation in the failure probability calculation for multiple components were reviewed and two possible ways considering the realistic situation were selected. Simple examples were tested to check the applicability of these methods. The conversion method between these two methods was suggested to render the evaluation using the advantages of each method possible.
Abstract
For the important safety system, two or more units of identical equipment or redundant components with similar function were installed to prevent abnormal failure. If the failure probability of such equipment is independent, this redundancy could increase the system safety remarkably. However, if the failure of each component is highly correlated by installing in a structure or experiencing an earthquake event, the expected redundancy effect will decrease. Therefore, the seismic correlation of the equipment should be evaluated quantitatively for the seismic probabilistic safety assessment. The correlation effect can be explained in the procedure of constructing fragility curves. In this study, several methodologies to quantify the seismic correlation in the failure probability calculation for multiple components were reviewed and two possible ways considering the realistic situation were selected. Simple examples were tested to check the applicability of these methods. The conversion method between these two methods was suggested to render the evaluation using the advantages of each method possible.
참고문헌 (14)
- Kennedy RP, "Seismic for Nuclear Power Plant Risk Studies", Nuclear Engineering and Design, 79, pp.47~68 (1984)
- Seismic Safety Margins Research Program; Systems Analysis (Project VIII), "Wells JE", Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, ~, pp.NUREG (1983), CR-2015
- Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment for Five U.S. Nuclear Power Plants, "USNRC", U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ~, pp.NUREG-1150 (1990)
- Sensitivity Studies of Seismic Risk Models, "Ravindra MK", Electric Power Research Institute, ~, pp.Report EPRI-NP-3562 (1984)
- Watanabe Y, "Development of the DQFM Method to Consider the Effect of Correlation of Component Failures in Seismic PSA of Nuclear Power Plant", Journal of Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 79, pp.265~279 (2003)
- Correlation of Seismic Performance in Similar SSCs (Structures, Systems, and Components), "Budnitz RJ", U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ~, pp.No. NUREG (2017), CR-7237
- Reed JW, "Analytical Techniques for Performing Probabilistic Seismic Risk Assessment of Nuclear Power Plants", ICOSSAR ’85, 4th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, pp.253~263 (1985)
- Procedures for the External Event Core Damage Frequency Analyses for NUREG-1150, "Bohn MP", Sandia National Laboratories, ~, pp.NUREC (1990), CR-4840
- Iman RL, "A Distribution-free Approach to Inducing Rank Correlation Among Input Variables", Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 11(3), pp.311~334 (1982)
- Pellissetti MF, "Integration of Correlation Models for Seismic Failures into Fault Tree Based Seismic PSA", Transactions of Twenty-First SMiRT Conference (2011)
- Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment Implementation Guide, "Wakefield D", EPRI, ~, pp.EPRI TR-1002989 (2003)
- Ebisawa K, "Concept and Methodology for Evaluating Core Damage Frequency Considering Failure Correlation at Multi Units and Sites and Its Application", Nuclear Engineering and Design, 288, pp.82~97 (2015)
- Seismic Fragility Applications Guide Update, "EPRI", EPRI, ~, pp.EPRI 1019200 (2009)
- Seismic Fragility and Seismic Margin Guidance for Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessments, "EPRI", EPRI, ~, pp.EPRI 3002012994 (2018)