본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

WANT in American Voyage Narratives in the Early 19th Century: A Corpus-based Approach

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The English verb WANT, which has a vast use in our daily lives, has undergone dramatic changes semantically and syntactically over time. This paper investigated from a construction grammar perspective the semantic and syntactic use of WANT in American voyage narratives in the early 19th century to discover patterns of usage differences, particularly between nonfiction and fiction. It also examined differing the co-occurrence preferences between WANT and constructions in which WANT filled a slot, utilizing a collostuctional analysis method. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses have been implemented. It was found that there were semantic and syntactic differences in the use of WANT between nonfiction and fiction. Nonfiction showed significantly more use of WANT than did fictional works, and more nominal use (meaning either ‘lack’ or ‘lack/need’) than verbal use (meaning ‘need/desire’). As usage of the noun WANT declined in fiction, the verb WANT increased accompanying semantic change from ‘lack’ to ‘need/desire’. The progressive BE want+ing form occurred in the intransitive pattern in both nonfiction and fiction. WANT was strongly associated with the idiomatic expressions of in want (of) and for (the) want of in nonfiction. Occurrences of these constructions were scarce in fiction as the nominal use of WANT declined. (200 words)

Abstract

The English verb WANT, which has a vast use in our daily lives, has undergone dramatic changes semantically and syntactically over time. This paper investigated from a construction grammar perspective the semantic and syntactic use of WANT in American voyage narratives in the early 19th century to discover patterns of usage differences, particularly between nonfiction and fiction. It also examined differing the co-occurrence preferences between WANT and constructions in which WANT filled a slot, utilizing a collostuctional analysis method. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses have been implemented. It was found that there were semantic and syntactic differences in the use of WANT between nonfiction and fiction. Nonfiction showed significantly more use of WANT than did fictional works, and more nominal use (meaning either ‘lack’ or ‘lack/need’) than verbal use (meaning ‘need/desire’). As usage of the noun WANT declined in fiction, the verb WANT increased accompanying semantic change from ‘lack’ to ‘need/desire’. The progressive BE want+ing form occurred in the intransitive pattern in both nonfiction and fiction. WANT was strongly associated with the idiomatic expressions of in want (of) and for (the) want of in nonfiction. Occurrences of these constructions were scarce in fiction as the nominal use of WANT declined. (200 words)

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Akimoto, M., "Rivalry among the verbs of wanting", English Historical Linguistics, 2, pp.117~138 (2008)
  2. Bertschinger, M., "To want, an essay in semantics", Swiss Studies in English, 12 (1941)
  3. Bybee, J., "Language change (Cambridge textbooks in Linguistics)" (2015), Cambridge University Press
  4. "Citation"[URL]
  5. Chomsky, N., "Syntactic structures" (1957), Mouton de Gruyter
  6. "The Pilot: A tale of the sea" (1824)[URL]
  7. "International Conference on English Historical Linguistics", 2018, ~
  8. De Smet, H., "The changing functions of competing forms : Attraction and differentiation", Cognitive Linguistics, 29(2), pp.197~234 (2018)[DOI]
  9. "Two years before the mast: A personal narrative of life at sea" (1840)[URL]
  10. Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
  11. Goldberg, A. E., "Concise encyclopedia of syntactic theories", pp.68~71 (1996), Pergamon
  12. Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language" (2006), Oxford University Press
  13. functional research, "Empirical and experimental methods in cognitive", pp.2010, Gries, S. T. H.
  14. Groom, N., "Construction grammar and the corpus-based analysis of discourses: the case of the WAY IN WHICH construction", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 24(3), pp.335~367 (2019)[DOI]
  15. Hampe, B., "Discovering constructions by means of collostruction analysis: The English denominative construction", Cognitive Linguistics, 22(2), pp.211~245 (2011)[DOI]
  16. Hilpert, M., "Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy", pp.391~404 (2014), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  17. Hirano, H., "Captain David Porter and Melville’s Anti-colonialism", Human Science Research, 3, pp.117~165 (2007)
  18. Krug, D. F., "Topics English Linguistics 32", pp.117~166 (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
  19. Krug, D. F., "English historical syntax and morphology", pp.131~156 (2002), John Benjamins
  20. Lenz, W. E., "Narratives of exploration, sea fiction, mariners’ chronicles, and the rise of American nationalism: “To cast anchor on that point where all meridians terminate”", American Studies, 32(2), pp.41~61 (1991)
  21. "Typee: A pee at Polynesian life" (1846)[URL]
  22. "Citation" (2022)[URL]
  23. Perek, F., "Using distributional semantics to study syntactic productivity in diach-rony : A case study", Linguistics, 54(1), pp.149~188 (2016)[DOI]
  24. Poe, E. A., "The Project Gutenberg" (1838)
  25. "Journal of a cruise made to the Pacific Ocean in the years 1812, 1813, and 1814" (1815)[URL]
  26. Stefanowitsch, A., "The Oxford handbook of construction grammar", pp.290~306 (2013), Oxford University Press
  27. Stefanowitsch, A., "Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), pp.209~243 (2003)
  28. Stefanowitsch, A., "Covarying collexemes", Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(1), pp.1~43 (2005)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)