원자력 QA의 능력수준 평가를 위한 SE-CMM과 KEPIC QAP-1간의 비교
Comparison of SE-CMM and KEPIC QAP-1 for Assessing Capability Level of Nuclear QA
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
Nuclear project company establishes and maintains its QA system in the conformance with applicable Codes & Standards and contract provisions. Certifying agency(e.g., Korea Electric Association) or project owner appraises the effectiveness of the company QA system by surveying or auditing it. However, although the company fulfills the requirements of this survey/audit, the capability level of its nuclear QA system is not appraised numerically and developed in that KEPIC QAP-1, used by the company as a nuclear QA guidebook, does not describe an approach for managing the capability level of the QA system. This study evaluates the characteristics of QAP-1 from the viewpoint of SE-CMM(Capability Maturity Model for Systems Engineering) in order to suggest a possible solution.
참고문헌 (10)
- "소프트웨어 프로세스 개선을 위한 CMM과 ISO9001 간의 비교 연구", 31(1), pp.76~89 (2003)
- "CMM개념을 활용한 건설PMIS평가모델개발" (2002), 건축공학과동국대학교.
- ". 개발프로젝트 시스템의 기술관리 설계모델" (2004), 아주대학교. 시스템공학과
- "KEPIC 교재(미출판" (2002), 엘리스컨설팅.
- "시스템엔지니어링 적용환경 능력평가모델 개발방안 연구", pp.9~13 (2002), 한국시스템엔지니어링협회
- "원전 건설 및 운영과 KEPIC의 역할", pp.66~ (2003), 대한전기협회
- "ISO9001 and the SE-CMM" (1996)
- "Systems Engineering Guidebook" (1997), , CRC Press.
- "CMMISM-The Evolution Continues!", 5(1), pp.7~18 (2002)
- "A Systems Engineering Capability Maturity Model Version 1.1CMU", SEI-MM-003,, 1995, ~[DOI]