본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대규모 언어모델 기반 학술 토픽 설명 생성의 정량․정성 평가 연구: OpenAlex 사례

Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Scholarly Topic Description Generation Using Large Language Models: A Case Study on OpenAlex

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산업공학

초록

This study develops a generative AI-based system for automatically generating scholarly topic descriptions within the OpenAlex database and evaluates its performance. Although OpenAlex provides concise topic descriptions, they lack contextual richness and informational coverage, limiting researchers’ ability to quickly grasp the semantic relevance of each topic. To address this issue, this study generated new descriptions for a total of 4,516 topics by utilizing metadata attributes— topic_id, topic_name, description, and keywords— and compared them with the original descriptions. Multiple large language models (LLMs), including GPT, LLaMA, and Mistral, were employed, and a consistent prompt-en- gineering scheme was designed to ensure the reproducibility of model comparison. A standardized evaluation framework integrating quantitative and qualitative indicators was proposed. Quantitative evaluation included keyword-based Precision, Recall, and F1 scores, ROUGE-L, Specter2 embedding-based cosine similarity, and BERTScore. Qualitative evaluation was conducted using LLM-based pairwise comparison, assessing Relevance, Coverage, and Clarity, with relative rankings determined through the Elo rating system. Furthermore, the Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were applied to verify statistical significance. Experimental results revealed distinctive strengths and weaknesses across models, providing a benchmarking foundation for improving automated content generation in scholarly databases such as OpenAlex. The proposed evalua- tion framework also offers a reproducible and consistent basis for assessing various generative models, contributing to both academic research and practical system development.

Abstract

This study develops a generative AI-based system for automatically generating scholarly topic descriptions within the OpenAlex database and evaluates its performance. Although OpenAlex provides concise topic descriptions, they lack contextual richness and informational coverage, limiting researchers’ ability to quickly grasp the semantic relevance of each topic. To address this issue, this study generated new descriptions for a total of 4,516 topics by utilizing metadata attributes— topic_id, topic_name, description, and keywords— and compared them with the original descriptions. Multiple large language models (LLMs), including GPT, LLaMA, and Mistral, were employed, and a consistent prompt-en- gineering scheme was designed to ensure the reproducibility of model comparison. A standardized evaluation framework integrating quantitative and qualitative indicators was proposed. Quantitative evaluation included keyword-based Precision, Recall, and F1 scores, ROUGE-L, Specter2 embedding-based cosine similarity, and BERTScore. Qualitative evaluation was conducted using LLM-based pairwise comparison, assessing Relevance, Coverage, and Clarity, with relative rankings determined through the Elo rating system. Furthermore, the Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were applied to verify statistical significance. Experimental results revealed distinctive strengths and weaknesses across models, providing a benchmarking foundation for improving automated content generation in scholarly databases such as OpenAlex. The proposed evalua- tion framework also offers a reproducible and consistent basis for assessing various generative models, contributing to both academic research and practical system development.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)