본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

치은의 biotype이 결합조직이식 후 치근피개도에 미치는 영향

Influence of gingival biotype on the amount of root coverage following the connective tissue graft

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류치의학

초록

Purpose: The integrity of interproximal hard/soft tissue has been widely accepted as the key determinant for success or degree of root coverage following the connective tissue graft. However, we reason that the gingival biotype of an individual, defined as the distance from the interproximal papilla to gingiva margin, may be the key determinant that influence the extent of root coverage regardless of traditional classification of gingival recession. Hence, the present study was performed with an aim to verify that individual gingival scalloping pattern inherent from biotype influence the level of gingival margin following the connective tissue graft for root coverage. Methods: Test group consisted of 43 single-rooted teeth from 21 patients (5 male and 16 female patients, mean age: 36.6 years) with varying degrees of gingival recession requiring connective tissue graft; 20 teeth of Miller class Ⅰ and 23 teeth of Miller class Ⅲ gingival recession, respectively. The control group consisted of contralateral teeth which did not demonstrate apparent gingival recession, and thus not requiring root coverage. For a biotype determination, an imaginary line connecting two adjacent papillae of a test tooth was drawn. The distance from this line to gingival margin at mid-buccal point and this distance (P-M distance) was designated as “gingival biotype” for a given individual. The distance was measured at baseline and 3 to 6 months examinations postoperatively both in test and control groups. The differences in the distance between Miller class Ⅰ and Ⅲ were subject to statistical analysis by using Student's t-test while those between the test and control groups within a given patient were by using paired t-test. Results: The P-M distance at 3 to 6 months postoperatively was not significantly different between Miller classⅠ and Miller class Ⅲ. It was not significantly different between the test and control group in a given patient, either, both in Miller classⅠ and Ⅲ. Conclusions: The amount of root coverage following the connective tissue graft was not dependent on Miller's classification, but rather was dependent on P-M distance, strongly implying that the gingival biotype of a given patient may play a critical impact on the level of gingival margin following connective tissue graft. (J Korean Acad Periodontol 2009;39:111-118)

Abstract

Purpose: The integrity of interproximal hard/soft tissue has been widely accepted as the key determinant for success or degree of root coverage following the connective tissue graft. However, we reason that the gingival biotype of an individual, defined as the distance from the interproximal papilla to gingiva margin, may be the key determinant that influence the extent of root coverage regardless of traditional classification of gingival recession. Hence, the present study was performed with an aim to verify that individual gingival scalloping pattern inherent from biotype influence the level of gingival margin following the connective tissue graft for root coverage. Methods: Test group consisted of 43 single-rooted teeth from 21 patients (5 male and 16 female patients, mean age: 36.6 years) with varying degrees of gingival recession requiring connective tissue graft; 20 teeth of Miller class Ⅰ and 23 teeth of Miller class Ⅲ gingival recession, respectively. The control group consisted of contralateral teeth which did not demonstrate apparent gingival recession, and thus not requiring root coverage. For a biotype determination, an imaginary line connecting two adjacent papillae of a test tooth was drawn. The distance from this line to gingival margin at mid-buccal point and this distance (P-M distance) was designated as “gingival biotype” for a given individual. The distance was measured at baseline and 3 to 6 months examinations postoperatively both in test and control groups. The differences in the distance between Miller class Ⅰ and Ⅲ were subject to statistical analysis by using Student's t-test while those between the test and control groups within a given patient were by using paired t-test. Results: The P-M distance at 3 to 6 months postoperatively was not significantly different between Miller classⅠ and Miller class Ⅲ. It was not significantly different between the test and control group in a given patient, either, both in Miller classⅠ and Ⅲ. Conclusions: The amount of root coverage following the connective tissue graft was not dependent on Miller's classification, but rather was dependent on P-M distance, strongly implying that the gingival biotype of a given patient may play a critical impact on the level of gingival margin following connective tissue graft. (J Korean Acad Periodontol 2009;39:111-118)

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Santarelli GA, "Connective tissue grafting employing the tunnel technique : a case report of complete root coverage in the anterior maxilla", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 21(1), pp.77~83 (2001)
  2. Hall WB, "Present status of soft tissue grafting", J Periodontol, 48(9), pp.587~597 (1977)
  3. Baker DL, "The possible pathogenesis of gingival recession. A histological study of induced recession in the rat", J Clin Periodontol, 3(4), pp.208~219 (1976)
  4. Khocht A, "Gingival recession in relation to history of hard toothbrush use", J Periodontol, 64(9), pp.900~905 (1993)
  5. Smukler H, "The toothbrush and gingival traumatic injury", J Periodontol, 55(12), pp.713~719 (1984)
  6. Boyd RL, "Mucogingival considerations and their relationship to orthodontics", J Periodontol, 49(2), pp.67~76 (1978)
  7. Donaldson D, "Gingival recession associated with temporary crowns", J Periodontol, 44(11), pp.691~696 (1973)
  8. Wilson RD, "Marginal tissue recession in general dental practice: a preliminary study", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 3(1), pp.40~53 (1983)
  9. Allen EP, "Coronal positioning of existing gingiva: short term results in the treatment of shallow marginal tissue recession", J Periodontol, 60(6), pp.316~319 (1989)
  10. Blanes RJ, "The bilateral pedicle flap-tunnel technique: a new approach to cover connective tissue graft", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 19(5), pp.471~479 (1999)
  11. Pennel BM, "Free masticatory mucosa graft", J Periodontol, 40(3), pp.162~166 (1969)
  12. Miller PD Jr, "A classification of marginal tissue recession", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 5(2), pp.8~13 (1985)
  13. Langer B, "Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage", J Periodontol, 56(12), pp.715~720 (1985)
  14. Roccuzzo M, "Periodontal plastic surgery for treatment of localized gingival recessions: a systematic review", J Clin Periodontol, 29(13), pp.178~194 (2002)
  15. Miller PD Jr, "Root coverage using the free soft tissue autograft following citric acid application. Ⅲ. A successful and predictable procedure in areas of deep-wide recession", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 5(2), pp.14~37 (1985)
  16. Melcher AH, "On the repair potential of periodontal tissues", J Periodontol, 47(5), pp.256~260 (1976)
  17. Seibert J, "Esthetics and periodontal therapy. In: Textbook of clinical periodontology. 2nd ed", pp.477~514, Munksgaard
  18. Muller HP, "Gingival phenotypes in young male adults", J Clin Periodontol, 24(1), pp.65~71 (1997)
  19. Olsson M, "Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors", J Clin Periodontol, 18(1), pp.78~82 (1991)
  20. Claffey N, "Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy", J Clin Periodontol, 13(7), pp.654~657 (1986)
  21. Sanavi F, "Biologic width and its relation to periodontal biotypes", J Esthet Dent, 10(3), pp.157~163 (1998)
  22. Weisgold AS, "Contours of the full crown restoration", Alpha Omegan, 70(3), pp.77~89 (1977)
  23. Weisgold AS, "Single-tooth anterior implant: a world of caution. PartⅠ", J Esthet Dent, 9(5), pp.225~233 (1997)
  24. Olsson M, "On the relationship between crown form and clinical features of the gingiva in adolescents", J Clin Periodontol, 20(8), pp.570~577 (1993)
  25. Pontoriero R, "Surgical crown lengthening: a 12-month clinical wound healing study", J Periodontol, 72(7), pp.841~848 (2001)
  26. Langer B, "The subepithelial connective tissue graft. a new approach to the enhancement of anterior cosmetics", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2(2), pp.22~33 (1982)
  27. Lindhe J, "Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry. 4th ed", pp.611~613 (2003), Blackwell Munksgaard
  28. Zucchelli G, "Clinical and anatomical factors limiting treatment outcomes of gingival recession: a new method to predetermine the line of root coverage", J Periodontol, 77(4), pp.714~721 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

치은 퇴축 회복을 위한 상피하 결합조직 이식을 동반하는 다양한 치근피개술에 대한 임상적 평가허익, 권영혁, 김성원, 박준봉, 신승일, 정종혁대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2008 · 제38권 제4호결합조직이식을 이용한 노출된 치근피개김완수, 김윤상, 박재영, 신형식, 유형근, 윤우혁, 피성희대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2008 · 제38권 제2호상피하 결합조직 이식편을 이용한 치근 피개술허익, 권영혁, 김정현, 박준봉, 정종혁대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2008 · 제38권 제1호Periodontal biotype modification using a volume-stable collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a case series김성태, 김현주, Hyeong-Il Kim, Hyeyoon Chang, Yang-Jo Seol대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2018 · 제48권 제6호치은 퇴축과 관련된 난해한 증례에서의 상피하 결합조직이식술을 이용한 치근 피개술: 증례보고김병옥, 박도영, 송현종, 유상준, 정명진, 지충섭치의학연구원 · Oral Biology Research2014 · 제38권 제1호치경부 병소를 포함한 치은 퇴축 치료에 있어 결체 조직 이식과 수복 치료를 이용한 임상증례김은숙, 박진우, 서조영, 이재목대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2009 · 제39권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)